search for: davenet

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "davenet".

Did you mean: wavenet
2001 Mar 21
2
can't even start smbd
Hi, I compile and install samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 2.7, but I just can't start the smbd. $ smbd -D -p 3308 smbd: Version 2.0.7 : Must have effective user id of zero to run. Any info will be appreciated. Please reply to my personal email account. Bin Wang
2001 Mar 15
2
Win2K printing Problems with Samba
Hi everyone ! i have some trouble printing from Win2K to Samba Server : My configuration Server Samba : Mandrake Linux 7.2 Samba 2.0.7 CUPS Configured Printer on Parallel Port Kyocera FS 3750 with CUPS Client : Win2K PRO driver Apple LaserWriter When I send a request of print , my printer prints three pages : the first have a line like this: "%%[ProductName : GNU postscript] %%"
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...ain text] Hi all. First of all, excuse if my question was answered but I'm new in the list and need some help. I don't find any points on how to setup this: samba server | share1 | directory1 <---user1,@group1 | directory1 <---user2,@group2 Return-Path: <damason@davenet.mine.nu> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3494220 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 17:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199...
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...eter Dr. Peter Stauffert Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG Abteilung Informationsverarbeitung Informationstechnik Biberach Birkendorfer Str. 65 D-88397 Biberach Germany Email: peter.stauffert@bc.boehringer-ingelheim.com Tel. 07351 54 4950 FAX 07351 83 4950 Return-Path: <damason@davenet.mine.nu> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A90530A for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199...
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...: 95538209 > IRC: DALnet #startrek-central-denmark > WWW: http://privnet.dyndns.dk -- ________________________________________________ Karyn Joseph EIT - Agoura, CA UNIX Administrator 818/874-6116 ________________________________________________ Return-Path: <damason@davenet.mine.nu> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from osdecrane.dave.lan (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E76244BD for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [...
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...ients, even I can't read it from linux. What i must do? How can I create share with only one user access and windows clients not create a registry files in it share? Please e-mail to me directly: kil2000@ezmail.ru -- Best regards, KPML Admin of KPML (8332-351-300) Return-Path: <damason@davenet.mine.nu> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B9F5299 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199...
2001 Mar 13
1
Kerberos Support
As a new subscriber to this list, I would like to ask if the Kerberos support for Samba 2.2alpha (krb5 Redhat packages are what I've already got installed) is a bad idea. Lots of room for subjective answers, no? Specifically, does it require krb5 to make connections once the smb services are running, or is it simply a connection option, used if available? I have read that MS tailored
2001 Mar 15
1
EA, ACL and Kernel Patching
I think I joined the list a little late to catch any info on prepping Linux to support ACL's that went by. I've done some searching, but I haven't found the answers (except in switching to another file system that supports ACL). A message just went by this morning, however, that referred to a kernel patch for this functionality. Where can I find this patch and information? Thanks.
2004 Mar 18
0
User Profiles somewhat broken
Ned and Matze, These are the groupmappings as I currently have set them. Do the undefined ones make a difference? I had imagined not. System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) -> -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-3651717320-665621003-1503018246-513) -> users Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) -> -1 Guests (S-1-5-32-546) -> -1 Domain Computers (S-1-5-21-3651717320-665621003-1503018246-2015) -> machines