search for: davehollis

...ges that have been floating around to the latest release - 4/25/2010 - for those that are interested. There is quite a bit of new additions/changes over the past year such as the addition of a fuse driver for vmblock devices, vmxnet3, pvscsi, etc. SRPMS and .spec's available here: http://www.davehollis.com/packages/open-vm-tools-kmod.spec http://www.davehollis.com/packages/open-vm-tools.spec http://www.davehollis.com/packages/open-vm-tools-kmod-0-1.20100425.el5.src.rpm http://www.davehollis.com/packages/open-vm-tools-0-1.20100425.el5.src.rpm

Hello - I am not a subscriber to the mailing, please email me with help at mfabache@yahoo.com My shorewall (v2.0.1) has been working wonderful for the past year. I just added my Vonage and cannot get the Phone Adapter to sync up (2 blinks (looking for IP)) All I have done is run an ethernet cable from the WAN outlet on the phone adapter to a lan port on the router. After googling, I found

Hello All, I have installed Shorewall 2.0.7 and configured , I am using masq to share internet for users. I have problem of perticular sites . I blocked site IP address. and succeeded but i have problem of Public proxy addresses , some user use anonymous proxy Ip and get thru it and use blocked sites. I blocked Public proxy adresses but it lot of them( I mean more than one public proxy

Shorewall (as of 1.4.5) currently doesn''t work "out-of-the-box" with the recently released 2.6.0-test1 kernel. Fortunately, the problems are trivial and easy to fix. The check for OS version only checks for 2.4* and 2.5*, 2.6* obviously needs to be added to this. The next part is with loading the modules. Currently, loadmodule checks for $MODULESDIR/$module.o or

Hi all, I have set up a working OpenVPN2 connection between my Server and my gateway at home. Now I want all traffic to be routed through this VPN connection. Currently everything is going through eth1 to the internet (to the gateway of the University which forwards it to the internet :-). We must use a prox-server and because of this I am not abel to watch the real-Media streams on

...n MAS) > 5. Libvirt NAT-based network 2x-4x faster than Libvirt routed > network? (Kenni Lund) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 16:02:06 -0400 > From: David Hollis <dhollis at davehollis.com> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] open-vm-tools 20100425 rpm > To: centos-virt at centos.org > Message-ID: <4BFADB3E.80701 at davehollis.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 05/23/2010 04:02 PM, Fernando Gleiser wrote: > >> Do they require a...

Hi all, We want to do some stress testing of firewall configurations/hardware. We have discovered hping that seems a great tool for this, but funny enough Shorewall cuts it !!! even when you leave ports open :) So besides hping, any tool for this? Why is shorewall cutting this traffic? Thanks in advance. Regards. -- Jaime Nebrera - jnebrera@eneotecnologia.com Consultor TI - ENEO

What version of shorewall do you suggest I try on a FC3 system? TIA, /ChJ

I said: > # MSS CLAMPING > # Your kernel must have CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_TCPMSS set. > > I''ve activated the option, but to no result watsoever. > Checked my kernel config, and it states that CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_TCPMSS is a > loadable module, that should be loaded on demand. > Simon said: > Did you try adding it to /etc/shorewall/modules ? Actually, no I

(Appologies if you receive this twice, GMANE seems to have lost my original posting.) I currently have a setup where 20 remote networks are router through IPsec tunnels and I am using Shorewall''s terrific support for the kernel policy match module. I also have mobile clients using OpenVPN to connect into our head office network in setup bridged setup. All is good. (Thanks Tom for your

I have been given a set of "firewall rules" to open my firewall for DCC to support my spam filtering. (I have done many web searches trying to find info relating to DCC with Shorewall, to no avail. The problem is that I am clueless on how these "rules" translate into the shorewall rule format. Could someone please help me translate these? allow udp local gt 1023 to remote

Hi, I had set rules so that my client can only visit few sites instead of the whole net. My question is, how can I allow my client to activate it''s product key and also to run windows update? One more thing is, can I use domain name in the rule config? if yes, can I put just microsoft.com to refer to aaa.microsoft.com bbb.microsoft.com? Please advice

hi, there is no support for patch-o-matic netfilter modules. what i have to do if i want to use several patch-o-matic modules? which parts of code has to be changed and will that changed be included into the main shorewall tree in future or not? best regards claus

First of all, My apologies for this maybe slight OT post, but I have so much confidence and read so much good replies on this list, that I am still asking my question. I''m looking for a linux distribution to use on our school''s homemade routers. The routers are small miniITX based systems with 2 network interfaces. I added a 4 port D-Link network card in some cases, when I

Problem: "Firewall" machine cannot get DNS but is allowing DNS through internally. Something changed with the configuration but we''re not sure what. Here is the pertinent info: Shorewall Status Entries Oct 5 09:24:50 all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth2 SRC=192.168.7.55 DST=65.175.131.201 LEN=55 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=50982 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=32973 DPT=53 LEN=35 Oct 5

Folks, I can''t keep this up. The demands that my job and my personal life are currently placing on me are such that supporing Shorewall to the extent that I have been doing is just not possible any more. I will continue to be active on the development list and will continue to develop Shorewall if at all possible. I will also continue to read the user''s list and will help

Hello all, What I am doing seems fairly straight forward to me, I just am not sure how to put it into Shorewall''s config files. Here is what I have: I have a single router that takes 5 public IP addresses and routes them to internal IP addresses. In the past, I had control over that router and could port filter at the router, forwarding only the traffic I wanted. However, now, I

I am a new user of shorewall, and am having some difficulty getting it set up on a new Fedora Core 3 system. When I run the shorewall script in the /etc/init.d the following errror message is received. tarting shorewall: ./shorewall: line 26: 10555 Terminated $exec start >/dev/null 2>&1 [FAILED]

This one is really throwing me. Thanks in advance for any advice. I''m working on a 4 port firewall system. It is running heartbeat+drbd. Primary box looks like this: eth0 -> net/cicso router 192.168.144.2/29 eth1 -> drbd/heartbeat crossover cable 192.168.254.253/30 eth2 -> dmz 192.168.144.10/24 eth3 -> loc 192.168.101.2/24 The IP''s

I''m running a Fedora Core 1 Samba server and Shorewall 2.0.1 Connections to Samba shares from both loc hosts and the fw host are usually impossible, unless I boot the Server and connect a loc machine to a Samba share before starting Shorewall. This requires manually toggling the startup_disabled filename and starting Shorewall manually after each boot. I used the two-interface