Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "daveb30".
Did you mean:
daveb
2025 Jan 21
0
Flac Digest, Vol 117, Issue 4
...; than "Re: Contents of Flac digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Duplicate Tag (Dave B)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:47:45 +0000
> From: Dave B <daveb30 at hotmail.com>
> To: brianw <brianw at audiobanshee.com>, "flac at xiph.org" <flac at xiph.org>
> Subject: Re: [Flac] Duplicate Tag
> Message-ID:
> <
> DM5PR0201MB339897AABD975BCFC38452A1B8E72 at DM5PR0201MB3398.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
> >...
2025 Jan 19
3
Duplicate Tag
Hi Dave,
I haven't reviewed metaflac to see whether its algorithm might incorrectly show a tag twice. It's possible that dBpoweramp appended a tag that already existed. I imagine that if metaflac says there's an occurrence of the tag with no value, and another with a value, then that's probably accurate. Can you show the output of metaflac? That might help verify.
You could use
2025 Jan 19
1
Duplicate Tag
If I run the metaflac command, "metaflac --show-all-tags path\filename". There is a tag that is listed twice. Only one of the tags has a value. This seems to be the case for all of my flac files. I ripped these with dBpoweramp and this tag was added/defined as a "custom" tag.
I can run the same command using exiftool, "exiftool --tag-all path\filename" and I only