search for: data_readi

My Linux box just bit the dust in a dramatic fashion (complete lockup, needed a cold reboot). Although I am not at all sure what the cause was, the last message in the system log mentioned samba, and there are some other funny looking samba-related messages in there. I'm not asking for a diagnostic, but if anyone has seen these before, maybe they can tell me what they mean: Last message

Hi Ezra/skaar, Wow man, the exercise was worth it. The connection closed problem with socket as i mentioned in my earlier mails...completely disappeared, and now i can connect only once to the socket and keep reading..till end of its days. Literally impossible with older release of backgroundrb. This could also potentially solve the issues people were having with ActiveRecord. As i said

I get the following error when trying to mount a Windows 95 machine from my Linux machine (RedHat4.2, 2.0.30) [Samba version 1.9.16p11]. smb_get_length: Invalid NBT packet smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL My command line argument is: $ smbmount //printser/test /mnt/test I have also tried -c, -U, -P options and get

Cuando intento conectarme a un recurso de un NT desde Linux, lo hago con la siguiente l?nea de ordenes: Linux:/#smbmount //server/recurso /punto_de_anclaje /I IP_del_server -C -U Administrador <RET> password:passwd_del_Administrador<RET> mount error:invalid argument Please look at smbmount?s manual page for possible reasons En la consola del servidor Linux sale por pantalla.

Iztok Polanic <iztok@hakl-hakl.si> carved some runes like this: > > 1. I have just installed samba on my computer. It works great and > > I can mount all Windows computers, except NT. When I try > > "smbmount //192.168.1.4/C /mnt/test" I get this error: > > > > Password: > > smb_get_length: Invalid NBT packet > >

Hi, I am new to Linux, I am using RedHat version 6.0 and Samba 2.0.5a. I try to set up a Samba Server for a LAN. So far everything (i.e. installation) worked fine, I installed samba from .rpm and nmbd, smbd is started at boot successfully. I can see the Samba server in the Windows95 network environment, but when I doubleclick on it or when I try to smbmount a service from another Linux machine I

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> >From preread, prewrite and preexec callbacks we will send the KVMI_EVENT_PF events caused by access rights enforced by the introspection tool. Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com>

Hi! I am using smbfs to mount a NT 4.0 SP3 disk to a Linux 2.0.33 box (SuSE 5.1). This works most of the time. Sometimes, I get a syslog entry |Jun 26 23:03:10 palandt kernel: smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL on the smbmount command, which subsequently fails "illegal parameter". What am I doing wrong? I currently can't browse the digest archives because my

Hi all, when i try to smbmount an WinNT shared drive, i get the following message: mount error: Invalid argument And in my logfile i get at this time: Nov 9 18:02:33 linux3 kernel: smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL On my other linux-system i can mount with the same command without any problems. have anyone an idea?? thx bye Sven

Hi! I have a new machine on a network: kemmer: New Linux box (kernel 2.0.36. Samba 1.9.18p10) torres: old Linux box (kernel 2.0.36. Samba 1.9.18p10) janeway: Windows NT 4.0 SP4. torres and janeway are performing flawlessly, I can access both machine's shares from the other one. kemmer is new and can't access DNS yet. Thus, I have to use the -I switch to smbclient and smbmount to access

Samba 2.0.5a smbfs 2.0.1 linux 2.0.36 (RedHat 5.2) encrypted passwords in /etc/smbpasswd When I try to mount a share with my correct Samba password, I get: smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL mount error: Invalid argument Please look at smbmount's manual page for possible reasons Then once I accidentally used my UNIX password, and it works. O?O Why? Shouldn't it

Hi! I am experiencing strange smbmount problems with my 3 computers. I have: janeway, an NT 4.0 SP5 box, torres, a Linux box running kernel 2.0.36 and samba 2.0.5a, q, a Linux box running kernel 2.0.36. Both Linux machines have smbfs compiled as a module and loaded. I can smbmount janeway shares on both torres and q, and I can see torres shares on janeway. Naturally, q can't be seen by

A friend of mine is running Samba (samba-2.0.3-8) on a couple RedHat Linux 6.0 machines. He is sharing files bilaterally at work with a WinNT machine and at home with a Win9x machine. In both places, he is getting a large number of SMB error messages. I'm not sure whether these are from the smbfs (smbmount) or from the Windoze machines accessing the Linux drives, though I suspect the

Can someone tell me where to find what error messages mean or enlighten me as to what smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL means ? Many thanks Ian

Dear samba users, I'm trying to add static entries to a samba WINS server (samba-1.9.18p8-51.2). Therefore I have a file /etc/samba/lmhosts: -------------------------------------------- klimt.iwr KLIMT klee KLEE -------------------------------------------- and start nmb with: /usr/sbin/nmbd -d 3 -H /etc/samba/lmhosts The problem now is: Only if "wins proxy=yes"

dear folks, when I run smbclient -L <hostname>, I've got the problem ; Added interface ip=10.1.1.32 bcast=10.1.7.255 nmask=255.255.248.0 Server time is Thu Jul 9 15:30:47 1998 Timezone is UTC+7.0 Domain=[AIFILE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 1.9.16p9] SMBtconX failed. ERRSRV - ERRaccess (The requester does not have the necessary access rights within the specified context for the

Hello. I hope that this is the proper place to ask this. Here is my problem. I have several smbmounts under Red Hat Linux 5.1. They need to be accessed by my apache web server. One of the mounts keeps getting disconnected, but this is not noticed by Linux. So the Linux box thinks that the files under the smbmount are still accessable when they aren't actually mounted. What would be the best

From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com> The access to a tracked memory page leads to two types of actions from the introspection tool: either the access is allowed (maybe with different data for the source operand) or the vCPU should re-enter in guest (the page is not tracked anymore, the instruction was skipped/emulated by the introspection tool, etc.). These new callbacks must

The KVM introspection subsystem provides a facility for applications running on the host or in a separate VM, to control the execution of other VM-s (pause, resume, shutdown), query the state of the vCPUs (GPRs, MSRs etc.), alter the page access bits in the shadow page tables (only for the hardware backed ones, eg. Intel's EPT) and receive notifications when events of interest have taken place

The KVM introspection subsystem provides a facility for applications running on the host or in a separate VM, to control the execution of other VM-s (pause, resume, shutdown), query the state of the vCPUs (GPRs, MSRs etc.), alter the page access bits in the shadow page tables (only for the hardware backed ones, eg. Intel's EPT) and receive notifications when events of interest have taken place