search for: darilion

Hi! Is it somehow possible to evaluate the SIP response code inside the dialplan? I have an Asterisk server which forwards requests to various PSTN gateways with SIP. If the Dial() attempt is not successful I want to differ at least these 3 options: - called destination is busy (486): e.g. activate auto-redial - called destination does not exist, unassigned number (404) - gateway is broken,

Hi! I want to use Asterisk as load generator to test quality degradation with increased load (e.g. testing other SIP equipment or IP-links). Is anybody aware of such a setup with Asterisk - is it possible to get RTP statistics out of Asterisk (e.g. jitter, packet loss, reordering ...)? Thanks Klaus

Hi! What are the typical ways to work around the 64 groups limit? thanks klaus

Hi! What is the preferred way to make database lookups from within the dialplan? I only know the MYSQL function from asterisk-addons. Are the other methods too? (e.g. for postgresql, unixodbc) thanks klaus

Hi! Since some time the download of the newest Asterisk does not contains the version number anymore, but is just called "asterisk-1.4-current.tar.gz" This gives me a tarball where I do not know the version without looking into the tarball. Thus, IMO it would be very useful to switch back to old schema war the download contained the version number. Thanks Klaus

Hi all, Is it possible to install more than 1 asterisk in a single server? If yes, what do I need to set and take care? Rgds, ango

Hi! I just found out that Asterisk (1.4) does not write CDRs if the incoming call was not forwarded but handled internally without answering the call. E.g.: [from_pstn] exten => 997,1,Answer() exten => 997,2,Playback(tt-weasels) exten => 997,3,Hangup() exten => 999,1,Playback(tt-weasels|noanswer) exten => 999,4,Hangup() For incoming calls to 997 a CDR will be written, but not

Hi! I use the following condition: if (${FOOBAR}=YES) { ... } The problem is, that if FOOBAR is not defined at all Asterisk generates a warning: WARNING[11982]: ast_expr2.fl:407 ast_yyerror: ast_yyerror(): syntax error: syntax error, unexpected '=', expecting $end; Input: =YES Of course I could use the following code, but this bloats up the code: if (${EXISTS(${FOOBAR})}) {

Hi Armin! I have problems on debian sarge with standard 2.6.8-2-386 kernel. I've installed the packages: kernel-headers-2.6.8-2 kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-386 kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386 kernel-kbuild-2.6-3 kernel-source-2.6.8 Then I unpacked the kernel sources into /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.8 and made a symlink from /usr/src/linux --> kernel-source-2.6.8 Then I entered

Hi! All the AEL examples have a semicolon after the closing curly bracket, e.g: context test { 1 => Hangup(); }; but without ; it works fine too, e.g: context test { 1 => Hangup(); } So - what is the reason for the ; after the closing curly bracket? thanks klaus

...implementing ALIAS. Including NSD, but I reckon it?s much more challenging to do due to NSD architecture than it was to implement it in PowerDNS. But if NSD developers some day feel bored, perhaps implementing ALIAS would solve that ? ;-) Rubens > Em 11 de jan. de 2024, ?(s) 07:49, Klaus Darilion via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> escreveu: > > Hi Christof! > > AFAIK, PowerDNS is the only open source name server that supports ALIAS. There was an idea to standardize ALIAS as "ANAME" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-aname/), but the...

Hi! I have a setup with Asterisk in front of a PBX connected with ISDN to the PSTN and to the PBX. This Asterisk (a old 1.2 instance) is doing ENUM for outgoing calls and allows incoming calls per SIP. Recently the IP connectivity for this location was down the whole telephony was down too - not even incoming calls did work. This is really strange as incoming calls from PSTN are routed

Hi! I've went through the READMEs and could not answer this question: During installation, the Setup program asks: Would you like update/upgrade wanpipe drivers? (y/n) For a pure Asterisk TDM installation - is it required to patch the kernel or is this only when using the sangoma cards as WAN router? regards klaus

Hi! I have the following problem with Asterisk 1.4.23: ATA w/ T.38 Asterisk ATA w/o T.38 --------INVITE--------> --------INVITE--------> <-------200OK---------- <-------200OK---------- --------ACK-----------> --------ACK-----------> --------INVITE

...idea was dropped in favor of SVCB/HTTPS record https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9460/. So now we have to wait until all Browser vendors implement SVCB/HTTPS. Regards Klaus PS: If you build something new, don't use ALIAS, it can cause you problems later due to incompatibilities -- Klaus Darilion, Head of Operations nic.at GmbH, Jakob-Haringer-Stra?e 8/V 5020 Salzburg, Austria > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: nsd-users <nsd-users-bounces at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> Im Auftrag von > Wolf Christof via nsd-users > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. J?nner 2024 15:41 > An: nsd-u...

Hi! I want to detect brute-force password hacking attacks - thus if there are too many failed login attempts for a SIP account I want to "lock" this account. Does somebody have any ideas how this could be implemented? thanks klaus

Hi (Armin)! Does someone knows how to identify the type of the card? The delivery note says it is a V-4BRI-8M, whereas lspci reports a 4BRI-8M. What is it really? Are there any Eicon tools to identify the card type? thanks klaus 0000:0a:03.0 Network controller: Eicon Networks Corporation Diva Server 4BRI-8M Rev 2 (rev 01) Subsystem: Eicon Networks Corporation Diva Server 4BRI-8M Rev

Hi! http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+sound+files+international#German lists a plenty of sound files for German. Can someone recommend one for Asterisk 1.4 (any maybe 1.6 soon). thanks klaus

Klaus Darilion <klaus.darilion at nic.at> wrote: > Yes. 4.8 will only use zone files, the "database" option will be ignored. Pre 4.8 versions can disable the "database" as Anand wrote bevor. Thanks for the clarification. It will be nice to stop the duplication! Cheers, Jamie

Jeroen Koekkoek via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > Anand's answer is entirely correct. > > Once 4.8.0 is released, zone files will be written once per hour by > default. I'm confused now :-) Arnand said the "database" option is being removed. Does this mean the database will always be created, or NEVER be created? I always wondered why