search for: damed

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 132 matches for "damed".

Did you mean: named
2005 May 07
1
Incorrect libxml2.2.dylib version on Tiger install
Hi all, I have just installed OSX Server 10.4 and R comes up with the incompatible libxml library message reported by Dan Kelley a few messages ago. Xcode 2 does not ship with Tiger Server. I installed the X-Windows code. I can report that the version of libxml2.2 that is installed in this case is the version 8.0.0 dylib. [6]sboker at munimula:/usr/lib % ls -l libxml2.2* -rwxr-xr-x 1
2008 Aug 07
3
Create new dataframes with dames from dataset...
Hi I'm wondering if you could save new data frames with in a loop using the names within the data frame... I.e. If you have a data frame as below Product Type Test A One 67 A Two 55 B One 42 A One 55 I would like to generate new dataframes as follow... A.One (including) A One 67 A One 55 A.Two (including) A
2004 Nov 25
2
logistic regression and 3PL model
Hello colleagues, I am a novice with R and am stuck with an analysis I am trying to conduct. Any suggestions or feedback would be very much appreciated. I am analyzing a data set of psi (ESP) ganzfeld trials. The response variable is binary (correct/incorrect), with a 25% base rate. I've looked around the documentation and other online resources and cannot find how I can correct for
2009 Jan 20
3
[LLVMdev] Shouldn't DAGCombine insert legal nodes?
...serts a 64-bit constant as the result of converting a (bitconvert (fabs val)) to a (and (bitconvert val), i64const). The problem: i64 constants have to be legalized for the CellSPU platform. DAGCombine is doing the right thing but it's not doing the right thing for CellSPU and it's damed difficult to work around this "feature". Moreover, the way all of SelectionDAGLegalize and DAGCombne's code is written, it's particularly difficult to "re- legalize" nodes unless one more legalization pass is invoked after DAGCombine. It's not like it's a...
2005 Feb 20
1
logistic regression and 3PL model
Hello colleagues, This is a follow up to a question I posed in November regarding an analysis I was working on. Thank you to Dr. Brian Ripley and Dr. John Fox for helping me out during that time. I am conducting logistic regression on data set on psi (ESP) ganzfeld trials. The response variable is binary (correct/incorrect), with a 25% guessing base rate. Dr. Ripley suggested that I
2004 Sep 22
5
Issue with predict() for glm models
[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]
2001 Oct 30
2
extracting object names as strings
Hi, I'm looking for a function which returns the name of the argument object as a string: >vect <- 1:3 >function(vect) "vect" I've looked at 'name', 'names', 'objects', none seem to do exactly what I want. ls/objects comes close, but I can't figure out how to force it to give me only one object name. daver
2009 Jan 20
0
[LLVMdev] Shouldn't DAGCombine insert legal nodes?
...onstant as the result of converting a (bitconvert (fabs val)) to a > (and (bitconvert val), i64const). > > The problem: i64 constants have to be legalized for the CellSPU > platform. DAGCombine is doing the right thing but it's not doing the > right thing for CellSPU and it's damed difficult to work around this > "feature". Moreover, the way all of SelectionDAGLegalize and > DAGCombne's code is written, it's particularly difficult to "re- > legalize" nodes unless one more legalization pass is invoked after > DAGCombine. I don't thi...
2006 Feb 15
1
Next Montreal meeting - the 21st - featuring a conference call with Mark Spencer
Hi, This is a reminder about our next meeting. It will be held from 6pm to 8pm, February 21 at Modulis offices which are at 360 Notre Dame ouest bureau 104, H2Y1T9, Old Montreal. Thanks to Claude Patry, we will be having a 20 minute conference call with Mark Spencer. If you'd like to ask Mark a question, please send it to me by email. We are limited to 5 questions, and will do our best to
1997 Oct 09
0
R-alpha: [sboker@calliope.psych.nd.edu: Re: S-PLUS on UNIX plans]
--Multipart_Thu_Oct__9_10:41:03_1997-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII In case you did not realize how much this is related to R : --Multipart_Thu_Oct__9_10:41:03_1997-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: s-sender@utstat.toronto.edu From: "Steven M. Boker" <sboker@calliope.psych.nd.edu> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 97 16:37:05 -0500 To: s-news@utstat.toronto.edu Subject:
2001 Jan 11
1
Oops -- forgot URL
>From /., here's the URL with the announcement of mp3PRO http://www.twice.com/html/pagebeta.cfm?InputKey=2853 {+} Jeff Squyres {+} squyres@cse.nd.edu {+} Perpetual Obsessive Notre Dame Student Craving Utter Madness {+} "I came to ND for 4 years and ended up staying for a decade" --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage:
2001 Aug 20
1
Another // comment
vorbis/lib/vorbisenc.c:138 and 157 have "//" comments. Patch included for the lazy (like me!). {+} Jeff Squyres {+} squyres@cse.nd.edu {+} Perpetual Obsessive Notre Dame Student Craving Utter Madness {+} "I came to ND for 4 years and ended up staying for a decade" Index: vorbis/lib/vorbisenc.c =================================================================== RCS file:
2000 Aug 22
1
vorbis' configure
It seems that the configure script in CVS does not check the CFLAGS environment variable at all. Indeed, on line 121 of configure.in, CFLAGS is explicitly set to be blank. Is this done for a reason? I see that several sets of CFLAGS are passed into the Makefiles by configure based upon specific architecture/compiler combinations -- perhaps this is the reason...? I ask because users may wish to
2009 Jan 20
5
[LLVMdev] Shouldn't DAGCombine insert legal nodes?
...t of converting a (bitconvert (fabs val)) to a >> (and (bitconvert val), i64const). >> >> The problem: i64 constants have to be legalized for the CellSPU >> platform. DAGCombine is doing the right thing but it's not doing the >> right thing for CellSPU and it's damed difficult to work around this >> "feature". Moreover, the way all of SelectionDAGLegalize and >> DAGCombne's code is written, it's particularly difficult to "re- >> legalize" nodes unless one more legalization pass is invoked after >> DAGCombine....
2003 May 13
0
bug in promax?
I was wondering whether the following inconsistency of the promax rotation function with the results of a promax rotation using SAS should be considered a bug in the promax function of R. Any comments will be highly appreciated. The following is a loading matrix obtained from a varimax rotation in SAS: # Factor loadings after varimax rotation x <- t(array(c(0.78107, 0.35573,
2013 Mar 25
2
Faster way of summing values up based on expand.grid
Hello! # I have 3 vectors of values: values1<-rnorm(10) values2<-rnorm(10) values3<-rnorm(10) # In real life, all 3 vectors have a length of 25 # I create all possible combinations of 4 based on 10 elements: mycombos<-expand.grid(1:10,1:10,1:10,1:10) dim(mycombos) # Removing rows that contain pairs of identical values in any 2 of these columns: mycombos<-mycombos[!(mycombos$Var1
2001 Mar 11
1
vorbis_analysis() dependencies?
Per Monty's suggestions from a while ago, I have [finally] gotten around to playing with different schemes for parallel oggenc. Monty's main suggestion was to have a single thread loop over reading samples and calling vorbis_analysis_blockout(), and then queueing up the resulting blocks to be processed through vorbis_analysis() in other threads (in parallel). To verify that this works, I
2009 Jan 20
0
[LLVMdev] Shouldn't DAGCombine insert legal nodes?
...itconvert (fabs val)) to a >>> (and (bitconvert val), i64const). >>> >>> The problem: i64 constants have to be legalized for the CellSPU >>> platform. DAGCombine is doing the right thing but it's not doing the >>> right thing for CellSPU and it's damed difficult to work around this >>> "feature". Moreover, the way all of SelectionDAGLegalize and >>> DAGCombne's code is written, it's particularly difficult to "re- >>> legalize" nodes unless one more legalization pass is invoked after >>&...
2003 May 01
0
factanal
# I have a question about how factanal is calculating the regression factor # scores based on an oblique rotation (promax) of the factors. # # As is explained in the help file, regression factor scores are # obtained as # # hat f = Lambda' Sigma^-1 x # # However, according to Harman's "Modern Factor Analysis" (e.g. second # edition, pp. 351-352) the formula is # # hat f = Phi
2005 May 27
2
Sample Files Improvement
2005/5/27, Paul Gear <paul@gear.dyndns.org>: > > I think a champion for the samples is just what we need right now. Tom > carried so much of shorewall completely on his own, but we can''t afford > to do that. We need each person to take responsibility in one > particular area, and then get in and *do* it. The samples are there in > CVS now