search for: da0s1e

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "da0s1e".

Did you mean: da0s1a
2008 Jun 06
3
6.2-STABLE => 7.0-STABLE Upgrade root partition more full
...ross referencing with Googling and getting help from our network engineer here at CWU. Before the upgrade, running df showed: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 507630 77662 389358 17% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/da0s1e 507630 588 466432 0% /tmp /dev/da0s1f 268217320 4866120 241893816 2% /usr /dev/da0s1d 4298926 162066 3792946 4% /var Now it shows: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 507630 184834 282186 40% / devfs...
2003 Jul 09
3
/var error
Hello there, I have some problem with my filesystem. #df -h ... /dev/da0s1e 288M 265M -208.0K 100% /var ... #du -h /var .. 19M /var .. Does anybody has an idea what Im supposed to do? Thank you. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
2008 Sep 30
5
GELI partition mount on boot fails after 7.0 -> 7.1-PRERELEASE upgrade
I was using a GELI partition for /usr/home on 7.0, so it attaches and mounts on boot. The problem is it stopped working after the system was upgraded to RELENG_7/7.1-PRERELEASE. Here's how it goes: I have the following /etc/fstab: /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/ad0s1d
2012 Mar 28
2
problem: bsdlabel
hail, I partitioned the disk this way: fdisk da0 ******* Working on device /dev/da0 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=12161 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=12161 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size
2003 Jun 08
2
sub-directory 'hung' ...
...g that I should run to get more information when something like this happens? Note that when this happens, I can't do an ls of /vm ... /vm isn't a unionfs: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 516062 84446 390332 18% / /dev/da0s1e 1032142 24 949548 0% /tmp /dev/da0s1f 10322414 7972110 1524512 84% /usr /dev/da0s1g 1032142 91890 857682 10% /var /dev/da0s1h 119837208 85749532 24500700 78% /vm procfs 4 4 0 100% /p...
2006 Apr 19
0
AHC Panic
...frags, 62761 blocks, 0.8% fragmentation) /dev/da0s1a: FILE SYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS /dev/da0s1a: clean, 224734 free (670 frags, 28008 blocks, 0.1% fragmentation) /dev/ad2s1a: FILE SYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS /dev/ad2s1a: clean, 123038 free (1206 frags, 15229 blocks, 0.3% fragmentation) /dev/da0s1e: FILE SYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS /dev/da0s1e: clean, 177737 free (1441 frags, 22037 blocks, 0.3% fragmentation) Setting hostname: cwtest. vfs.nfsrv.async: 0 -> 1 ed0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::240:5ff:fe55:fe74%ed0 prefixlen 64 tenta...
2015 Jun 10
0
newbie question on installation over existing Linux
...ssumption. In fact, on the machine that I'm currently typing this message on, the file systems look like this: # uname -sr; mount -t ufs FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE /dev/da0s1a on / (ufs, local, journaled soft-updates) /dev/da0s1d on /tmp (ufs, local, journaled soft-updates) /dev/da0s1e on /var (ufs, local, journaled soft-updates) /dev/da0s1f on /usr (ufs, local, journaled soft-updates) (Everything else, especially /home, is NFS-mounted.) Patrick
2003 Oct 03
1
USB problems with CF and with Jenoptik JD5.2Z3
Have the following problems: MBO USB-MultiCardREader 6-in-1 does not read 128MB CF-Card. Oct 3 13:49:23 katrin /kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 Oct 3 13:49:23 katrin /kernel: da0: <ICSI IC1100 CF 2.5B> Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device Oct 3 13:49:23 katrin /kernel: da0: 650KB/s transfers Oct 3 13:49:23 katrin /kernel: da0: Attempt to query device size failed:
2003 May 18
3
ad0: READ command timeout....
This morning I found a frozen box. On the console was this: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata0: resetting devices .. ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded done After reboot, those messages were found in /var/log/messages. I'm running FreeBSD 4.8-RC from Apr 4 10:45:49 EST 2003. Any ideas? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
2015 Jun 09
2
newbie question on installation over existing Linux
On Jun 8, 2015, at 8:16 PM, g <geleem at bellsouth.net> wrote: > > On 06/08/2015 09:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 6/8/2015 6:29 PM, Peter wrote: >>> You can thank Fedora for making that rather pointless change and >>> breaking that capability. >> >> that 'capability' was a holdover of the 1980s when disks were >> measured in
2003 Apr 10
2
Crash dump in umount
Hello. I'm having a 4.7Rp9 server which is since months quite unstable, so I've compiled a debug kernel and got a crash dump. I'm a programmer and I know a little how to use gdb, I'm not so expert about FreeBSD kernel insides however, so I can't get much from it. Any kind of help is appreciated. This is the crash message: IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x0032f000 initial pcb
2003 Jul 27
2
SMP Problems with 4.8-RELEASE
Hello, I have the following hardware configuration. Tyan 2466N motherboard, 1.03 BIOS, 2 Athlon-MP 1800+ CPUs, 512MB registered ECC DRAM, Onboard 3Com NIC (xl type) Radeon 8500 AGP video card Adaptec 3210S SCSI RAID controller Comtrol RocketPort 8 port PCI serial card I have started to experience some odd system lockups in the past couple months, and it seems to be getting worse. I particular,
2006 Mar 19
2
6.0-REL problems with ISA ed0, FFS corruption and ancient hardware
...es. <118>kernel dumps on /dev/da0s1b <118>Entropy harvesting: <118>. <118>swapon: adding /dev/da0s1b as swap device <118>Starting file system checks: <118>/dev/da0s1a: 1012 files, 21314 used, 52949 free (485 frags, 6558 blocks, 0.7% fragmentation) <118>/dev/da0s1e: DEFER FOR BACKGROUND CHECKING <118>/dev/da0s1d: DEFER FOR BACKGROUND CHECKING <118>/dev/da1s1e: 147526 files, 1872872 used, 159266 free (754 frags, 19814 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted mode = 040755, inum...
2012 May 30
29
Why Are You Using FreeBSD?
Hi Everyone, This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it to this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users. I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which advertises exciting new features like SMP support), and before I do I'd like to get a better feel for why the rest of you are using FreeBSD. If you had to