Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d83588".
Did you mean:
d83088
2020 Jul 21
3
[RFC] Preferred error/note style across non-clang tools, e.g. tablegen
A question of preference came up in https://reviews.llvm.org/D83588 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D83588> as to whether we ought to prefer emitting TableGen error messages with all of the information in a single diagnostic, or whether it makes sense to split things in an error+note style as seen in many clang diagnostics. TableGen doesn’t use a DiagnosticsEngine,...
2020 Jul 21
3
[RFC] Preferred error/note style across non-clang tools, e.g. tablegen
...vm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jul 21, 2020, at 11:50 AM, Jonathan Roelofs via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>
>> A question of preference came up in https://reviews.llvm.org/D83588 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D83588> as to whether we ought to prefer emitting TableGen error messages with all of the information in a single diagnostic, or whether it makes sense to split things in an error+note style as seen in many clang diagnostics. TableGen doesn’t use a DiagnosticsEngine,...
2020 Jul 22
2
[RFC] Preferred error/note style across non-clang tools, e.g. tablegen
...>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jul 21, 2020, at 11:50 AM, Jonathan Roelofs via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A question of preference came up in https://reviews.llvm.org/D83588 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D83588> as to whether we ought to prefer emitting TableGen error messages with all of the information in a single diagnostic, or whether it makes sense to split things in an error+note style as seen in many clang diagnostics. TableGen doesn’t use a DiagnosticsEngine,...