search for: d41791

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "d41791".

Did you mean: d41761
2018 Jan 06
0
RFC: Legalize input operand to ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP* by zero-extending
I've already posted a patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D41791) to do this, but here's a bit of a background. When the operands of an ISD::ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP{_WITH_SUCCESS} are legalized by promoting to a larger type, they're extended without specifying whether it's a sign or zero extension. However, an analogous node (SETCC) is legalized by zero-ext...