Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "d34231".
Did you mean:
d34233
2017 Jun 15
2
[CFI] Manually linking classes that have no inheritance link
...th the following patches I was able to specify the links between these
classes such that during compilation the vtable of the generic proxy class
was added to the vtable sets at virtual callsites with the type of the
JS-component classes:
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D34233
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D34231
Without these patches, XPCOM would have to be significantly changed and
probably written from scratch. Simply making the JS-component classes a
descendant of the generic proxy class, or vice versa, is not an option,
because this would break the design. Making the generic proxy class a
descendant o...
2017 Jun 16
2
[CFI] Manually linking classes that have no inheritance link
...y the links between these
>> classes such that during compilation the vtable of the generic proxy class
>> was added to the vtable sets at virtual callsites with the type of the
>> JS-component classes:
>> - https://reviews.llvm.org/D34233
>> - https://reviews.llvm.org/D34231
>>
>> Without these patches, XPCOM would have to be significantly changed and
>> probably written from scratch. Simply making the JS-component classes a
>> descendant of the generic proxy class, or vice versa, is not an option,
>> because this would break the design. M...
2017 Jun 16
2
[CFI] Manually linking classes that have no inheritance link
...se classes such that during compilation the vtable of the generic proxy
>>>> class was added to the vtable sets at virtual callsites with the type of
>>>> the JS-component classes:
>>>> - https://reviews.llvm.org/D34233
>>>> - https://reviews.llvm.org/D34231
>>>>
>>>> Without these patches, XPCOM would have to be significantly changed and
>>>> probably written from scratch. Simply making the JS-component classes a
>>>> descendant of the generic proxy class, or vice versa, is not an option,
>>>>...
2017 Jun 19
2
[CFI] Manually linking classes that have no inheritance link
...ion the vtable of the
generic proxy
> >>>>> class was added to the vtable sets at virtual callsites with the
type of the
> >>>>> JS-component classes:
> >>>>> - https://reviews.llvm.org/D34233
> >>>>> - https://reviews.llvm.org/D34231
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Without these patches, XPCOM would have to be significantly changed
and
> >>>>> probably written from scratch. Simply making the JS-component
classes a
> >>>>> descendant of the generic proxy class, or vice vers...