Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "d3418".
Did you mean:
3418
2014 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Seh exceptions on Win64
...unreachable prologue.
To clarify and allow proper reviews for the different patches I opened
reviews for four of them (the fifth got LGTM in the discussion but it does
have the ownership issue you wrote)
D3417
Emit a trap instruction for IR 'unreachable <http://reviews.llvm.org/D3417>
D3418
SEH exceptions on Win64 (LLVM) <http://reviews.llvm.org/D3418>
D3419
SEH exceptions on Win64 (clang part) <http://reviews.llvm.org/D3419>
D3420
MinGW toolchain <http://reviews.llvm.org/D3420>
Per your suggestion the link to the original discussion in D3418 was added.
Code aut...
2014 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Seh exceptions on Win64
Hi Chandler,
Kai contributed the WIN64 SEH patch some time ago on llvm-commits:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131118/196105.html
it was never completed. Kai also responded in this thread.
I opened a phabricator for the patch
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3418
Yaron
2014-04-18 12:31 GMT+03:00 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> This is mostly based on work done by kai from redstar.de
>>
>
> Martell, you really c...
2014 Apr 18
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Seh exceptions on Win64
...EH
MinGW. The first five could be committed after review and LGTM but the last
one also requires Ray Donnelly approval.
Please comment in the Phabricator so the comments would be kept in context.
'unreachable' trap
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3417
Win64 SEH (LLVM)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3418
Win64 SEH (clang)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3419
MinGW toolchain
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3420
TLS (clang)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3421
Register names instead of numbers
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3422
2014-04-18 14:42 GMT+03:00 Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com>:
>...
2014 Apr 17
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Seh exceptions on Win64
Hi,
On 15.04.2014 23:44, Vadim Chugunov wrote:
> Hi,
> I am curious - how does clang deal with epilogue-less functions that
> result from _Raise_Exception being marked 'noreturn'?
> I've also been playing with Kai's patch, and discovered that this tends
> to greatly confuse Windows stack unwinder in cases when noreturn call is
> at the end of a function, so
2014 Apr 15
10
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Seh exceptions on Win64
Hi,
I'd like to submit a patch to match the clang patch on the front end.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140414/103257.html
The front end doesn't need this patch to work but it's still important.
This is mostly based on work done by kai from redstar.de
Could I get some feedback on this?
I'm not sure if the emitting of the register names will effect