search for: d1926

...Caml please take a look at these? 1) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1925 Every other function in OCaml bindings accepts context explicitly, would it be a legitimate change to make existing functions accept it as well? This would break the API. 2) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1926 I'd like to add garbage collection support to the API wherever safe, that's at least DataLayout.t and llmemorybuffer. This removes the need for .dispose. I could remove it and break the API or print a warning at runtime. 3) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1927 In o...

...ough, and I'll write to the OCaml ML. > > This leaves another question open: are there any LLVM developers who > can review OCaml patches? > I honestly don't know. -- Sean Silva > > >> -- Sean Silva >> >> >> 2) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1926 [2] >>> >>> >>> I'd like to add garbage collection support to the API >>> wherever safe, that's at least DataLayout.t and llmemorybuffer. >>> This removes the need for .dispose. I could remove it and break >>> the API or prin...