Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "d15828".
Did you mean:
d15829
2016 May 25
3
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items)
...info) the main benefit was
>> inlining (also as expected). A simple pass of inlining at threshold 100
>> appeared to give all the benefits. Even inlining at threshold 0 gave almost
>> all the benefits. For example, the passes initially proposed in
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D15828 did not improve over just inlining with
>> threshold 100.
>>
>> (due to PR27299 we also need to add simplifycfg after inlining to clean
>> up, but this doesn't affect the instrumentation overhead in our
>> measurements)
>>
>> Bottom line: for our use ca...
2016 May 25
0
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items)
...benefit was
>>> inlining (also as expected). A simple pass of inlining at threshold 100
>>> appeared to give all the benefits. Even inlining at threshold 0 gave almost
>>> all the benefits. For example, the passes initially proposed in
>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D15828 did not improve over just inlining with
>>> threshold 100.
>>>
>>> (due to PR27299 we also need to add simplifycfg after inlining to clean
>>> up, but this doesn't affect the instrumentation overhead in our
>>> measurements)
>>>
>>>...
2016 May 25
0
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items)
...to provide more info) the main benefit was
> inlining (also as expected). A simple pass of inlining at threshold 100
> appeared to give all the benefits. Even inlining at threshold 0 gave almost
> all the benefits. For example, the passes initially proposed in
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D15828 did not improve over just inlining with
> threshold 100.
>
> (due to PR27299 we also need to add simplifycfg after inlining to clean
> up, but this doesn't affect the instrumentation overhead in our
> measurements)
>
> Bottom line: for our use cases, inlining does all the w...
2016 May 24
5
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items)
...nts (and we are glad to provide more info) the main benefit was
inlining (also as expected). A simple pass of inlining at threshold 100
appeared to give all the benefits. Even inlining at threshold 0 gave almost
all the benefits. For example, the passes initially proposed in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15828 did not improve over just inlining with
threshold 100.
(due to PR27299 we also need to add simplifycfg after inlining to clean up,
but this doesn't affect the instrumentation overhead in our measurements)
Bottom line: for our use cases, inlining does all the work, but we're not
opposed to...
2016 May 24
0
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items)
...to provide more info) the main benefit was
> inlining (also as expected). A simple pass of inlining at threshold 100
> appeared to give all the benefits. Even inlining at threshold 0 gave almost
> all the benefits. For example, the passes initially proposed in
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D15828 did not improve over just inlining with
> threshold 100.
>
> (due to PR27299 we also need to add simplifycfg after inlining to clean
> up, but this doesn't affect the instrumentation overhead in our
> measurements)
>
> Bottom line: for our use cases, inlining does all the w...