Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1925 matches for "culprits".
Did you mean:
culprit
2009 Jan 06
2
Drawing from an empirical distribution
Hi All,
Does anybody know if there is a simple way to draw numbers from an empirical
distribution?
I know that I can plot the empirical cumulative distribution function this
easy:
plot(ecdf(x))
Now I want to pick a number between 0 and 1 and go back to domain of x.
Sounds simple to me.
Any suggestion?
Thank you,
Your culprit
(everybody needs a culprit)
--
View this message in context:
2011 Jul 08
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM on ARM testing.
On 07/ 4/11 01:39 AM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> For the JIT failures, it would be nice if you could track down the SVN
> revision when it started failing. (We have an ARM buildbot at
> http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 ,
> but the JIT was already broken when it was set up.)
I've used my i.MX53 board to get this, but I'm returning it today back
to
2020 Feb 05
3
IndVarSimplify: getBackedgeTakenCount and Release vs Assert
Hi,
I am investigating a difference in code generation between release and assert builds of llvm.
The culprit is IndVarSimplify that comes up with different behavior on the same input:
in the assertion build, it does do an extra 'INDVARS: Rewriting loop exit condition'
After digging around, it seems that following change is the culprit:
-----
Author: Philip Reames <listmail at
2011 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM on ARM testing.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote:
> On 07/ 4/11 01:39 AM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>>
>> For the JIT failures, it would be nice if you could track down the SVN
>> revision when it started failing. (We have an ARM buildbot at
>> http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 ,
>> but the JIT was
2016 Nov 11
0
Maildir filename has wrong S value - possible culprit
Hi,
I'm new to dovecot but as I see in mailinglist archive this issue is old
and I didn't find this in archive.
One of cuplrits (I believe not the only possible) is spamassassin. It's
added headers make exactly the difference between S value and filesize.
Probably it's in the way emails are processed in "manufactory" of
Qmail+Vpopmail+Spamassassin but now I'm not
2011 Jul 11
0
Email a build fail to the checkin culprit
Hi
I would like to ask how to configure the email address that will email to me and to the person who has checked in the files that has broken the build.
//Currently the email is fixed in the configfile with me as the sole address
project.email_notifier.emails = [''me at myemailaddress.com'']
Does anybody know how to change the email address dynamically following a build fail
2008 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] ComputeMaskedBits Bug
In tracking down an alignment bug, I think I found a problem in
ComputeMaskedBits. But I am not very well versed in this area of LLVM and
need some more eyes. This is in the 2.3 release, though it looks like the
relevant pieces operate the same way in trunk.
I have the following add recurrence:
%r849 = select i1 %r848, i64 0, i64 %r847 ; <i64> [#uses=10]
%r862 = shl i64 %r849, 3 ;
2010 Sep 27
2
BUG - qdev - partial loss of network connectivity
<20100926154324.GD21843 at redhat.com>; from Michael S. Tsirkin on Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 17:43:24 +0200
> > > >It's vanilla 2.6.32.22, but I also reproduced this on Debian's 2.6.32-23
> > > >(based on 2.6.32.21).
> > > >
> > > >If offload is the only difference, I'll play with different offload
> > > >options and check
2010 Sep 27
2
BUG - qdev - partial loss of network connectivity
<20100926154324.GD21843 at redhat.com>; from Michael S. Tsirkin on Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 17:43:24 +0200
> > > >It's vanilla 2.6.32.22, but I also reproduced this on Debian's 2.6.32-23
> > > >(based on 2.6.32.21).
> > > >
> > > >If offload is the only difference, I'll play with different offload
> > > >options and check
2008 Jul 18
3
[LLVMdev] ComputeMaskedBits Bug
On Friday 18 July 2008 00:36, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> David Greene wrote:
> > Is my analysis correct? If so, is the PHI code the culprit (for not
> > returning the min of the KnownZero bits) or is the Shl code the culprit
> > (for not paying attention to the Mask passed in (it right shifts it)?
>
> I think your analysis is correct, and that Shl -- and many of the other
2007 Nov 23
4
help! problem with mongrel, request.remote_ip and lighttpd
I have an existing rails application on lighttpd and I am trrying to upgrade
to mongrel for the enhanced scalability it offers.
I am running mongrel 1.1.1, rails 1.2.5, lighttpd 1.4.13 and ruby 1.8.5
Everything is working great except request.remote_ip returns 127.0.0.1 or
192.168.0.102 (the internal network address of the server running lighty).
I''ve seen some older posts about
2007 Aug 26
4
HTB doesn''t give me the promised rate: cpufreq?
Hi all :)
I''ve been using a tc setup for almost two years, but at some point
(probably when I switched to kernel 2.6.x, but I''m not sure) it has
started making something very weird.
For a certain class, the rate is 125000bit and the ceil is
270000bit, but the fastest rate I get is about 75-80000bit, instead of
the "promised" 125000, *with no other traffic in
2009 May 21
2
subsetting of a data.frame
Hello everybody
How do you subset a data.frame when your boundaries are a combination of
explicit and implicit limits?
For example, I need to subset from the fourth (explicit) to the last
(implicit) column a data.frame named A.
In other languages you would do A[ , 4:]. Would anybody show me the R's way?
Thank you,
Your culprit
--
View this message in context:
2008 Jul 18
0
[LLVMdev] ComputeMaskedBits Bug
David Greene wrote:
> Is my analysis correct? If so, is the PHI code the culprit (for not returning
> the min of the KnownZero bits) or is the Shl code the culprit (for not paying
> attention to the Mask passed in (it right shifts it)?
I think your analysis is correct, and that Shl -- and many of the other
operations (AShr, LShr, SExt, Add?, Call?) -- should be modified to
always
2010 Nov 23
5
[LLVMdev] how to eliminate dead infinite loops?
Most of my programs contain loops that the LoopDeletion pass is unable
to remove. It appears that the following code in LoopDeletion.cpp:152
is the culprit:
ScalarEvolution& SE = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>();
const SCEV *S = SE.getMaxBackedgeTakenCount(L);
if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(S))
return Changed;
So, LoopDeletion thinks my loops might be infinite so it
2011 May 04
4
Finding wich files a writen to
...ind to
which files the OS writes ? On OSX boxes, there is a utility called fs_usage
that can reports any disk activity for a particular process or all
processes. Is there any utility like this on Centos ?
iotop can points me to wich process, but that doesn't points me to what
files are the culprits...
2023 Nov 10
1
[REGRESSION]: acpi/nouveau: Hardware unavailable upon resume or suspend fails
#regzbot introduced: 89c290ea758911e660878e26270e084d862c03b0
#regzbot link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/273
#regzbot link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218124
## Reproducing
1. Boot system to framebuffer console.
2. Run `systemctl suspend`. If undocked without secondary display,
suspend fails. If docked with secondary display, suspend succeeds.
3. Resume
2020 Apr 28
5
llvm-objdump: failed to parse debug information
Hi,
In a 32-bit ARM build, I am seeing the following warning (edited for
simplicity, I can provide full logs if necessary):
> llvm-objdump -l -d -x file.elf
> llvm-objdump: warning: 'file.elf': failed to parse debug information for file.elf
All object files and static libraries seem to have debug info (i.e.,
llvm-objdump does not complain when run on each file individually and
2017 May 26
3
remove function pointer casts and constify function tables
Looks like the culprit is very likely d85b758f72b0 "virtio_net: fix
support for small rings".
After that patch, my NFS server VM stops responding to packets after a
few minutes of testing. Before that patch, my server keeps working.
--b.
2009 Oct 13
4
[LLVMdev] 65bit integer math
I have a test case(attached as fc_long.ll) that when run through the
optimizer produces 65bit integer math(fc_long-opt.ll).
Now I understand that llvm can have any length integer, but I consider
turning a 64bit mul into multiple 65 bit instructions to be a 'bad'
optimization. This eventually expands to a 128bit multiply
call(__multi3) which I have absolutely no interest in supporting.