search for: culprit

...w if there is a simple way to draw numbers from an empirical distribution? I know that I can plot the empirical cumulative distribution function this easy: plot(ecdf(x)) Now I want to pick a number between 0 and 1 and go back to domain of x. Sounds simple to me. Any suggestion? Thank you, Your culprit (everybody needs a culprit) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Drawing-from-an-empirical-distribution-tp21320810p21320810.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...to Freescale and my pandaboard is testing GHC performance so I'll not be able to get to this again earlier than next week. Anyway, JIT failures happens somewhere between 131458 (which is OK) and 131466 (where JIT tests fail). Let me know if this is enough or I shall continue to point to the culprit revision directly. Thanks, Karel

Hi, I am investigating a difference in code generation between release and assert builds of llvm. The culprit is IndVarSimplify that comes up with different behavior on the same input: in the assertion build, it does do an extra 'INDVARS: Rewriting loop exit condition' After digging around, it seems that following change is the culprit: ----- Author: Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.co...

...andaboard is testing GHC performance so I'll not be able > to get to this again earlier than next week. > > Anyway, JIT failures happens somewhere between 131458 (which is OK) and > 131466 (where JIT tests fail). Let me know if this is enough or I shall > continue to point to the culprit revision directly. Given that revision range, the only remotely likely culprit is 131463. Which basically means that it "broke" because the default target features changed. I'll going to try and debug this. -Eli

Hi, I'm new to dovecot but as I see in mailinglist archive this issue is old and I didn't find this in archive. One of cuplrits (I believe not the only possible) is spamassassin. It's added headers make exactly the difference between S value and filesize. Probably it's in the way emails are processed in "manufactory" of Qmail+Vpopmail+Spamassassin but now I'm not

Hi I would like to ask how to configure the email address that will email to me and to the person who has checked in the files that has broken the build. //Currently the email is fixed in the configfile with me as the sole address project.email_notifier.emails = [''me at myemailaddress.com''] Does anybody know how to change the email address dynamically following a build fail

...ucing 0x3f as KnownZero. I think this is wrong. We've got a PHI where one operand is known to have three low zero bits and the other is known to have six low bits. I contend that after the PHI we only know we have three low bits for sure. Is my analysis correct? If so, is the PHI code the culprit (for not returning the min of the KnownZero bits) or is the Shl code the culprit (for not paying attention to the Mask passed in (it right shifts it)? If my analysis is incorrect, can someone explain how we can know we have six low zero bits coming out of this? Thanks!...

...; > > > > >If offload is the only difference, I'll play with different offload > > > >options and check which one causes it. > > > > > > > > > > It's not technically the only difference but it's the most likely > > > culprit IMHO. > > > > udp fragmentation offload is definitely the culprit. > > I see. Most likely guest bug - won't be the first bug around UFO. > If so pls copy netdev linux-nfs and virtualization. > Do you see anything in dmesg? Can try 2.6.36-rc5? (for reference: first pos...

...; > > > > >If offload is the only difference, I'll play with different offload > > > >options and check which one causes it. > > > > > > > > > > It's not technically the only difference but it's the most likely > > > culprit IMHO. > > > > udp fragmentation offload is definitely the culprit. > > I see. Most likely guest bug - won't be the first bug around UFO. > If so pls copy netdev linux-nfs and virtualization. > Do you see anything in dmesg? Can try 2.6.36-rc5? (for reference: first pos...

On Friday 18 July 2008 00:36, Nick Lewycky wrote: > David Greene wrote: > > Is my analysis correct? If so, is the PHI code the culprit (for not > > returning the min of the KnownZero bits) or is the Shl code the culprit > > (for not paying attention to the Mask passed in (it right shifts it)? > > I think your analysis is correct, and that Shl -- and many of the other > operations (AShr, LShr, SExt, Add?, Call?...

...mongrel 1.1.1, rails 1.2.5, lighttpd 1.4.13 and ruby 1.8.5 Everything is working great except request.remote_ip returns 127.0.0.1 or 192.168.0.102 (the internal network address of the server running lighty). I''ve seen some older posts about this problem and it appears lighttpd is the culprit. Will pound solve this problem? Is there a way to get this working with lighttpd or do I need to use another webserver? Please help! Thanks, Raj.

...ittle below the line capacity, which is 320000bit), but as soon as tc is enabled again, the upload speed drops again to 75-80kbit. There is no other traffic on the device, really, it''s just like if the htb couldn''t queue packets fast enough :??? I''ve thought that the culprit may be cpufreq. I have cpufreq scaling activated, and cpufreq reduces the clock speed from 1800MHz to 1000MHz when the processor is idle. This is more or less the same amount that I "lose" in the rate. May this be the problem? How to fix without deactivating cpufreq? I''m usi...

...bset a data.frame when your boundaries are a combination of explicit and implicit limits? For example, I need to subset from the fourth (explicit) to the last (implicit) column a data.frame named A. In other languages you would do A[ , 4:]. Would anybody show me the R's way? Thank you, Your culprit -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/subsetting-of-a-data.frame-tp23655883p23655883.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

David Greene wrote: > Is my analysis correct? If so, is the PHI code the culprit (for not returning > the min of the KnownZero bits) or is the Shl code the culprit (for not paying > attention to the Mask passed in (it right shifts it)? I think your analysis is correct, and that Shl -- and many of the other operations (AShr, LShr, SExt, Add?, Call?) -- should be modified...

Most of my programs contain loops that the LoopDeletion pass is unable to remove. It appears that the following code in LoopDeletion.cpp:152 is the culprit: ScalarEvolution& SE = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>(); const SCEV *S = SE.getMaxBackedgeTakenCount(L); if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(S)) return Changed; So, LoopDeletion thinks my loops might be infinite so it does not delete them - even if they do not write to any o...

...ind to which files the OS writes ? On OSX boxes, there is a utility called fs_usage that can reports any disk activity for a particular process or all processes. Is there any utility like this on Centos ? iotop can points me to wich process, but that doesn't points me to what files are the culprits...

...w_bug.cgi?id=218124 ## Reproducing 1. Boot system to framebuffer console. 2. Run `systemctl suspend`. If undocked without secondary display, suspend fails. If docked with secondary display, suspend succeeds. 3. Resume from suspend if applicable. 4. System is now in a broken state. ## Testing - culprit commit is 89c290ea758911e660878e26270e084d862c03b0 - v6.6 fails - v6.6 with culprit commit reverted does not fail - Compiled with <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/uploads/788d7faf22ba2884dcc09d7be931e813/v6.6-config1> ## Hardware - ThinkPad W530 2438-52U - Dock with Nvidia-conne...

...eem to have debug info (i.e., llvm-objdump does not complain when run on each file individually and the disassembly output shows file/line information). In order to identify where the ELF file is lacking debug info, I added some debug traces to llvm-objdump and it seems the following symbol is the culprit: __ThumbV7PILongThunk_<my_func> Is this expected behavior? How to fix it? LLVM version is llvmorg-11-init-12683-g54b3f91d205 but AFAICT anything above 10.0 behaves the same. Thanks, -- Jerome

Looks like the culprit is very likely d85b758f72b0 "virtio_net: fix support for small rings". After that patch, my NFS server VM stops responding to packets after a few minutes of testing. Before that patch, my server keeps working. --b.

...vm can have any length integer, but I consider turning a 64bit mul into multiple 65 bit instructions to be a 'bad' optimization. This eventually expands to a 128bit multiply call(__multi3) which I have absolutely no interest in supporting. So I'm wondering what optimization might be the culprit here so I can disable it in this situation. Micah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091012/e646bec7/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scr...