search for: ct11

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "ct11".

Did you mean: c11
2007 Nov 21
0
Split access multi-route problem - need help.
...69 676 3122 / +44 870 162 4927 ext 2 Fax: +44 870 162 4925 Web: http://psand.net PGP: http://www.psand.net/mike/mike.gpg.pub IRC: irc://irc.psand.net:6667/#psand ---------- Psand Limited is registered in England and Wales company number 03291616. Registered office: 54 Goodwin Road, Ramsgate, Kent, CT11 0JJ, UK.
2007 Dec 04
2
Multiple routing query
...69 676 3122 / +44 870 162 4927 ext 2 Fax: +44 870 162 4925 Web: http://psand.net PGP: http://www.psand.net/mike/mike.gpg.pub IRC: irc://irc.psand.net:6667/#psand ---------- Psand Limited is registered in England and Wales company number 03291616. Registered office: 54 Goodwin Road, Ramsgate, Kent, CT11 0JJ, UK.
2006 Mar 28
1
Problems with pf + ftp-proxy on gateway
I'm trying to use pf + ftp-proxy n a 6.1-PRERELEASE machine. I have this line on inetd.conf: ftp-proxy stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/ftp-proxy ftp-proxy -n And this lines on pf.conf: rdr on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port ftp -> 127.0.0.1 port ftp-proxy pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any port ftp-data to $ext_if:0 user proxy flags S/SA keep
2006 Jan 24
3
IPsec, VPN and FreeBSD
Hi: We intend to build IPSec based VPN server on FreeBSD platform so that we can access internal network of a lab. The remote side will use VPN client and could be from anywhere of the Internet, or may be from the another site of the company. From the hnadbook, I saw the sample of site-to-site configurations and we do have one FreeBSD firewall (running ipfw) on both site and another one on
2008 Jul 16
3
named.conf: query-source address
Hi! I fully understand and second efforts on educating people how to configure BIND to be stong to attacks and keep them from using "query-source address" with "port" option but how about binding named to particular IP address when host has many of them? Using "query-source address" without "port" is the only solution (not speaking of jails here) and safe
2008 Feb 28
14
Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements
In http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html says Updating Existing Systems > An upgrade of any existing system to FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE constitutes > a major version upgrade, so no matter which method you use to update > an older system you should reinstall any ports you have installed on > the machine. This will avoid binaries becoming linked to inconsistent > sets