search for: cski

Hi Chris, Glad to hear from you. I hope everything goes well. This is also very exciting for us. As mentioned in the previous email of Zeson, C-SKY is a RISC architecture for high-performance and energy-efficient processors. Many Processors based on this architecture have been mass produced in different fields. At present, more than 1 billon have been shipped. The community for C-SKY

tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master branch HEAD: 1843e16d2df9d98427ef8045589571749d627cf7 Add linux-next specific files for 20240307 Error/Warning reports: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403071947.NUYuBx0G-lkp at intel.com Error/Warning: (recently discovered and may have been fixed) fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3246:26: warning:

tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master branch HEAD: 4118d9533ff3a5d16efb476a0d00afceecd92cf5 Add linux-next specific files for 20240411 Error/Warning reports: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404120101.dAQBAzh3-lkp at intel.com Error/Warning: (recently discovered and may have been fixed) huge_memory.c:(.text+0x1778): undefined reference

tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master branch HEAD: a6bd6c9333397f5a0e2667d4d82fef8c970108f2 Add linux-next specific files for 20240328 Error/Warning: (recently discovered and may have been fixed) ERROR: modpost: "memcpy" [crypto/chacha20poly1305.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "memcpy" [fs/efs/efs.ko] undefined! ERROR:

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:50:49PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 07:43:04AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:44:45AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 03:37:19AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 01:56:05PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote: > > >

Hello David! On 11/16/20 11:30 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev wrote: > Generally, the bar for being in-tree is fairly low, the bar to being removed > from the experimental-back-ends list is much higher. An experimental back end > is not built by default and is not in any of the binary releases. > > Experimental back ends provide a probation period for the maintainer community.

tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master branch HEAD: 1c6f93977947dbba1fc4d250c4eb8a7d4cfdecf1 Add linux-next specific files for 20230704 Error/Warning reports: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306260401.qZlYQpV2-lkp at intel.com https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306301709.lvrxzyCj-lkp at intel.com

tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master branch HEAD: 727900b675b749c40ba1f6669c7ae5eb7eb8e837 Add linux-next specific files for 20240403 Error/Warning reports: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404031246.aq5Yr5KO-lkp at intel.com https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404031346.wpIhNpyF-lkp at intel.com

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 1:27 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 11/15/20 9:33 PM, Simon Pilgrim via llvm-dev wrote: > > As well as the actual patch reviews, has there been official approval that the > > M68k experimental backend can be added to trunk? I guess we need a > > "Backend: M68k" bugzilla component -

Hi, To add to what Renato said: On 15/11/2020 21:59, Fāng-ruì Sòng via llvm-dev wrote: > I've looked at a few newer backends in LLVM and I think the policy is > unclear about how an experimental target is approved and reviewed. It's generally good form to tag anyone who commented in the mailing list threads on any patches, especially people who objected. If they're happy in

I'm running with CentOS 4.3 and the system was setup originaly with no development system and no kernel sources. I'm trying to get the headers and libraries installed and it is giving me fits. I've followed the suggestions on several threads and tried to yum install gcc, kernel-headers, kernel-devel but I seem to not be able to get /usr/include or use/include/sys packages... don't

Following up to the discussion in: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266093 at linutronix.de and the second version of this: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029221806.189523375 at linutronix.de this series provides a preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & related interfaces. This is achieved by: - Removing the RT dependency from migrate_disable/enable() - Consolidating all

Following up to the discussion in: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266093 at linutronix.de and the second version of this: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029221806.189523375 at linutronix.de this series provides a preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & related interfaces. This is achieved by: - Removing the RT dependency from migrate_disable/enable() - Consolidating all

Following up to the discussion in: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266093 at linutronix.de and the second version of this: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029221806.189523375 at linutronix.de this series provides a preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & related interfaces. This is achieved by: - Removing the RT dependency from migrate_disable/enable() - Consolidating all

As well as the actual patch reviews, has there been official approval that the M68k experimental backend can be added to trunk? I guess we need a "Backend: M68k" bugzilla component - is there anything else? On 13/11/2020 22:41, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via llvm-dev wrote: > Hello! > > On 11/3/20 6:10 PM, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: >> Just a quick update on the Motorola 6800

tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master branch HEAD: a734662572708cf062e974f659ae50c24fc1ad17 Add linux-next specific files for 20230801 Error/Warning reports: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307251531.p8ZLFTMZ-lkp at intel.com https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308020154.Xrcb9bWT-lkp at intel.com Error/Warning: (recently

There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to

There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to

There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to

There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to