search for: crufty

On 24 February 2016 at 19:49, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" > nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the > buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are > mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots

...t; 1) Some time ago all project files for MSVC 6 were removed; it makes sense > > to remove the code that is necessary only for MSVC 6 and older compilers. > > > > One may still compile using command line instead of a project file. Does > it really hurt keeping such code? Its crufty old code. I should be removed. It makes no sense to keep supporting 20 year old compilers (MSVC6 was was released in 1989 and MSVC7 in 1992 [0]). Erik [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_C%2B%2B -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo...

Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots *are* broken by this. -- Sean Silva On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at

This sounds like a good idea to me! I can’t think of any common platform where you can’t get 2.7. Lets get rid of that legacy cruft! > On Feb 23, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > Seems reasonable to me. Chris? > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016, 8:40 PM Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at

Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > On 24 February 2016 at 19:49, Sean Silva via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" >> nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the >> buildbots, so I'll probably do it some

> On 2016-Feb-24, at 12:48, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 24 February 2016 at 19:49, Sean Silva via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" >> nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the >>

...keyboard. # # I would like to bind a submenu to these function keys. Is this # possible and how can this be accomplished? # Or if anybody knows a place where this topic is documented, please let # me know. # # Any help would be greatly appreciated. As it happens, I just finished a (hopefully less crufty) patch to accomplish exactly what you're after. It's not quite as "pretty" on the screen as SuSE's stuff, but it's much "prettier" code and HUGELY easier to use. (I wasted several hours trying to make SuSE's stuff work on my live-CD...) http://www.valleyho...

Not sure where bug reports are going yet. I'd love to try to cross-compile with mingw, but git fails to build out of the box so far; these scripts work for most any other git tree I've used them on before. All that's done: ./autogen.sh ./configure --prefix=/home/avuton/src/mpd-release-utils/build-dir --host=i586-mingw32msvc - -build=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=i586-mingw32msvc

Hi all, We have a somewhat crufty Samba 3 PDC NT-style domain backed on to an OpenLDAP server that we use for both Linux and Windows 7 authentication, thanks to the magic of ldapsam and smbk5pwd. I am investigating the feasability of moving to Samba 4 and have tried upgrading with the classicupgrade tool in both the Samba 4.0.0...

I'm having problems with ADS membership for samba. I had a "mostly" working version with RHES v2.1, krb5 v1.2, samba v3.0.5. I knew to get to a fully functioning version I would need krb5 v1.3 or later. So finally I had an opertunity to junk RH's crufty krb5 and build from scratch with: RHES v2.1 MIT krb5 v1.4 samba v3.0.13 This works fine on another server. Now to the problem: I can join the domain. smbclient works flawlessly. kinit(1) works fine. However on another I try from a win2k client I get the authentication dialog box and keep get...

> There are times when arg0 can be NULL [for the interrupt-start or > interrupt-complete probe] if there''s no associated device. > There''s already a bug open to address the error in the documentation. > 6284911 args to interrupt-start and interrupt-complete need more info Hmm, I noticed that, too. There''s currently a thread on yahoo''s solarisx86

...want to suck in an external regex library. Can you give an example of how this would help? > BTW, is there a process for dropping compiler support? Eventually > most > compilers will have TR1 except for very old versions. It's not > feasible > to support all of those crufty compilers forever. There is no formal process. What do you need out of TR1? Is it possible to make it conditional? Many old compilers are already broken anyway, but all it takes is one "popular" one to make it a no-go. -Chris

On Tuesday 09 June 2009 14:34, Dan Gohman wrote: > Can you describe what problem you're trying to solve here? Does it > really need Regular Expressions? Yes. I want TableGen to be able to infer lots of stuff programmatically. This helps tremendously when specifying things like, oh, AVX. :) We could invent our own pattern matching syntax, but why?

...that capability in a > very minimal way. llvm-test has many purposes, but it's is there foremost as end-to-end tests for LLVM. The best way to do this, IMO is to take random programs off the shelf and plunk them in there. The problem with this, of course, is that these programs are often crufty, maybe buggy, and often have portability problems. I don't really see a solution to this: if we only accepted non-crufty, non-buggy, portable programs, we would have an empty set of tests :) The solution to this is just to hack on the programs where necessary. I've fixed countless bugs in...

...ta frame that runs from 1 to the number of sessions for each subject ID. What do you R gurus think of this? Is there a better more R-ish way to do this with without creating the session variable in the data frame and then looping? I find myself doing this sort of thing all the time and it feels crufty to me. Thanks, Mike -- Michael A. Miller mmiller3 at iupui.edu Imaging Sciences, Department of Radiology, IU School of Medicine "ID","date","session" 1,05/24/2006,1 1,02/01/2007,2 1,05/23/2007,3 1,07/06/2007,4 2,07/28/2006,1 2,09/...

...VESA: Detecting 418312 mS in detect_vesa done hardware detection, hit any key to resume turns out the problem was missing NSC data in cpuid.c, added in attached patch. Also reattaching previous patch, with more commit-message BTW, is there any interest in the timing code I used ? its slightly crufty, esp wrt nested timings, but could be cleaned up. OTOH, its trivial, and perhaps unlikely to be used again. the problem manifested in the commented out statement. its also worth noting that when offending code is restored, I get this value out Vendor : ?????????????????????????????????? w...

...VESA: Detecting 418312 mS in detect_vesa done hardware detection, hit any key to resume turns out the problem was missing NSC data in cpuid.c, added in attached patch. Also reattaching previous patch, with more commit-message BTW, is there any interest in the timing code I used ? its slightly crufty, esp wrt nested timings, but could be cleaned up. OTOH, its trivial, and perhaps unlikely to be used again. the problem manifested in the commented out statement. its also worth noting that when offending code is restored, I get this value out Vendor : ?????????????????????????????????? w...

...atures that you’d like to have. > > As I understood it, bumping the version to 2.8.12.1 is motivated by a bug related to "MSVC + Ninja” (http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14492 <http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14492> ) Raising CMake 2.8.12.x allows us to remove a bunch of crufty hacks to support older versions, and it gets some critical bug fixes for Visual Studio and Xcode generators (like support for Xcode 5). There are a lot of features in 2.8.10, 2.8.11 and 2.8.12 that would be nice to have too. > > If this is indeed a bug in CMake that affects one very specifi...

...ock;padding:0 10px;} #patch del {background:#fdd;text-decoration:none;display:block;padding:0 10px;} #patch .lines, .info {color:#888;background:#fff;} --></style> <title>[791] trunk/wxruby2/swig/classes/include/wxWindow.h: Remove shadowing GetBestSize def causing warning, plus strip crufty comments</title> </head> <body> <div id="msg"> <dl> <dt>Revision</dt> <dd>791</dd> <dt>Author</dt> <dd>brokentoy</dd> <dt>Date</dt> <dd>2006-12-20 18:43:44 -0500 (Wed, 20 Dec 2006)</dd>...

Is it possible to do straight text printing from wine? I am trying to get a crufty old application working under wine to replace a windows box. It wants to print to an Okidata using plain ascii. The wine postscript driver works but the printing is quite slow and ragged. Thanks for any assistance. Steve Bergman