search for: cruby

...at the behaviour of Marshal.dump and Marshal.load don''t align properly. Marshal.dump is it''s own self-contained set of code which essentially writes data to a BinaryStream. For ruby types, it ends up writing a series of values in a format that looks a lot like what I remember CRuby''s marshal writing. For CLR types, this just writes the Type name and no instance data (clr objects don''t have ruby instance variables after all) Marshal.load does 2 things: 1. Reads any ruby instance variables out into an Attributes dictionary 2. Uses reflection to find any non-...

I''m using acts_as_ferret and when I call Object.find_by_contents("A & B"), Ruby dies with the following message: ^Cruby(5014,0xa000cf60) malloc: *** vm_allocate(size=1069056) failed (error code=3) ruby(5014,0xa000cf60) malloc: *** error: can''t allocate region ruby(5014,0xa000cf60) malloc: *** set a breakpoint in szone_error to debug ruby(5014,0xa000cf60) malloc: *** vm_allocate(size=1069056) failed (erro...

Yo Zed, Just curious -- what do you think of the LiteSpeed server? Is it better than Lighty? Does it (gasp!) also serve Rails apps like Mongrel? I think I read that LiteSpeed doesn''t have proxying support. Thanks, Joe __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

I saw this on a forum for MODx (a CMS which seem very good, built on standards, with clean XHTML/CSS, using PHP). "RoR is a killer application, but is either a crusher when it comes to memory usage or SQL usage. Even simple seeming things can kill a server if it''s not dedicated to the application. In addition, RoR is much more complex really than MODx if you''re not

Here are some notes from the scalability session of last week''s Rails camp. They were entered by another session participant and are posted at: http://www.rubyonrailscamp.com/10%3A15%2Bsession%2B-%2Bscaling The key points from my point of view: - the Ruby VM is sketchy, rather like the Java VM around 1997 - the single threaded nature of Rails dispatch handling means we may incur a

I sure hope so: http://duckdown.blogspot.com/2006/03/additional-thoughts-on-why-ruby-isnt.html Seems like it''s getting genuine rebuttals, though. It''s actually kind of amusing.