search for: crowbarring

Hey guys, Has anyone had much success with XCP and Open Stack together? I''m in the process of putting together a open stack test cluster and I thought I might be able to use XCP dom0''s for it.. but to be honest it doesn''t look so good. I tried following these instructions on a separate XCP test machine: http://wiki.openstack.org/XenServerDevelopment At a first test

[Sorry if duplicate, one earlier was corrupt] Hi, I got section mismatches reported by modpost in latest build. It got reported for xen_register_pirq and xen_unplug_emulated_devices functions. xen_register_pirq makes reference to acpi_sci_override_gsi in init.data section; marking xen_register_pirq with __init is not feasible since calls are made to it from

[Sorry if duplicate, one earlier was corrupt] Hi, I got section mismatches reported by modpost in latest build. It got reported for xen_register_pirq and xen_unplug_emulated_devices functions. xen_register_pirq makes reference to acpi_sci_override_gsi in init.data section; marking xen_register_pirq with __init is not feasible since calls are made to it from

[Sorry if duplicate, one earlier was corrupt] Hi, I got section mismatches reported by modpost in latest build. It got reported for xen_register_pirq and xen_unplug_emulated_devices functions. xen_register_pirq makes reference to acpi_sci_override_gsi in init.data section; marking xen_register_pirq with __init is not feasible since calls are made to it from

I'd like to draw people's attention to bug report #143 that I've just submitted. This is a proposal (and patch) to add the ability to store arbitrary metadata associated with a database (rather than with an individual document in the database). The rationale for this feature is explained more fully in the bug report, but briefly I've come across several situations where I

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:39 AM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been watching the MC-JIT progress for some time, and #2 certainly > looks like the best idea to me. I think however you've missed an important > selling point of the "FOOJIT" architecture: > > * The use of a custom object file format directly enables the use

Hello I just read this article about a kid in England who built a box with a 3G SIM card: www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1394448/Doorbell-tricks-burglars-thinking-youre-home-invented-schoolboy-Laurence-Rook-13.html When someone rings your intercom, the box will call your cellphone so you can answer just like you were home. I don't know anything about electronics and would like to

As previous mentioned here, I think the best design would be to JIT code fast (using the FOO type) and then allow the user to build to some other format later if he/she wants. Reloading pre-JITed functions is a feature I'd like to see, because sometimes you have to JIT fast an inefficient function just to get it working and later optimize it. If you could save the functions for latter use

Quickbooks Pro works Purrrrrfectly on Corel Wine. It looks good, works good and prints good. The only caveat is that when it is running, you cannot launch Wordperfect as well - it is an either or situation. Cheers, Herman http://www.AerospaceSoftware.com Aerospace Software Ltd. Phone: 403+241-8773, Fax: 403+241-8841 E-mail: Aerosoft@AerospaceSoftware.com, Web:

Hi, I've been watching the MC-JIT progress for some time, and #2 certainly looks like the best idea to me. I think however you've missed an important selling point of the "FOOJIT" architecture: * The use of a custom object file format directly enables the use of ahead-of-time compilation (using the JIT to recompile dynamically). Not only this but it allows the resaving of any

John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/22/2017 1:16 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> a) Please don't top post. >> b) 'T'ain't funny, McGee. They don't have the budget, and they need this >> server*now*... it's one of their compute nodes, and at least one person >> is dead in the water. > > you can't afford a replacement for a 6-8 year old server

> > Dear all, Thanks for the greate explanation regaing Software/H/W Raid. This details better but on voip-info.org/wiki pages. Thanks lot agian. Regs, Vidura Senadeera. ====================================== Dear All, > > > > I would like to get community's feedback with regard to RAID1 ( Software > or > > Hardware) implementations with asterisk. > >

Answers below. At 05:13 AM 9/6/2015, Geert Stappers via Syslinux wrote: >On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 09:55:45AM -0500, John via Syslinux wrote: > > At 03:21 PM 9/2/2015, Geert Stappers via Syslinux wrote: > > > > Still having trouble: > > (-: Welcome to real life :-) > > > > > cd /tmp > >Please confirm that it is done at the notyetOpenWRT device at

On Dec 31, 2014, at 4:41 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> You keep talking about the cost of coping with change, but apparently you believe maintaining legacy interfaces is cost-free. >> >> Take it from a software developer: it isn?t. > > OK, but should one

Hi We have a number offices accommodating 4-6 people each hence it is very important for PBX to be fanless and silent. We have been looking at using IDE flash disks also called DOM. The performance tests we have done so far satisfy our requirements, however we are concerned with DOM durability. We have installed debian and vanilla asterisk on 1GB DOM. All seems to work fine at the moment however

Dear All, I would like to get community's feedback with regard to RAID1 ( Software or Hardware) implementations with asterisk. This is my setup Motherboard with SATA RAID1 support CENT OS 4.4 Asterisk 1.2.19 Libpri/zaptel latest release 2.8 Ghz Intel processor 2 80 GB SATA Hard disks 256 MB RAM digium PRI/E1 card Following are the concerns I am having I'm planing to put this asterisk

Hi all, I've been spending some time with customers lately and I've discovered an interesting thing. Many IT departments completely delegate the settings on directory and file ACLs to the users who are interested in the data. For example, on a given share for "Finance", the finance group is given full control on the containing directory (ie. they're allowed to set ACLs on

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Dec 29, 2014, at 10:07 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > >> it's not necessary for either code interfaces or data structures >> to change in backward-incompatible ways. > > You keep talking about the cost of coping with change, but apparently you believe

Hi all, As promised, here is the rough design of the upcoming MC-JIT*. Feedback appreciated! (*) To be clear, we are only calling it the MC-JIT until we have finished killing the old one. When I say JIT below, I mean the MC-JIT. I basically am ignoring completely the existing JIT. I will keep things API compatible whenever possible, of course. I see two main design directions for the JIT: --

Hi, The following patch series fixes hangup after creating checkpoint on Xen. The Linux Xen guest can be saved the state to restore later, and also created snapshot like checkpoint via the hypervisor. But, when the snapshot is created for the PV guest, it will hangup. We added ''PMSG_CANCEL'' message and ''cancel'' handler in dev_pm_ops struct in the pm-linux