search for: crowbar

Hey guys, Has anyone had much success with XCP and Open Stack together? I''m in the process of putting together a open stack test cluster and I thought I might be able to use XCP dom0''s for it.. but to be honest it doesn''t look so good. I tried following these instructions on a separate XCP test machine: http://wiki.openstack.org/XenServerDevelopment At a first test

[Sorry if duplicate, one earlier was corrupt] Hi, I got section mismatches reported by modpost in latest build. It got reported for xen_register_pirq and xen_unplug_emulated_devices functions. xen_register_pirq makes reference to acpi_sci_override_gsi in init.data section; marking xen_register_pirq with __init is not feasible since calls are made to it from

[Sorry if duplicate, one earlier was corrupt] Hi, I got section mismatches reported by modpost in latest build. It got reported for xen_register_pirq and xen_unplug_emulated_devices functions. xen_register_pirq makes reference to acpi_sci_override_gsi in init.data section; marking xen_register_pirq with __init is not feasible since calls are made to it from

[Sorry if duplicate, one earlier was corrupt] Hi, I got section mismatches reported by modpost in latest build. It got reported for xen_register_pirq and xen_unplug_emulated_devices functions. xen_register_pirq makes reference to acpi_sci_override_gsi in init.data section; marking xen_register_pirq with __init is not feasible since calls are made to it from

I'd like to draw people's attention to bug report #143 that I've just submitted. This is a proposal (and patch) to add the ability to store arbitrary metadata associated with a database (rather than with an individual document in the database). The rationale for this feature is explained more fully in the bug report, but briefly I've come across several situations where I

...mpilation (using the JIT to recompile dynamically). Not only > this but it allows the resaving of any functions that may have been > JIT-optimised during runtime so they can be used immediately next run. > > This, coincidentally, is something that I was pondering on a way to try to > crowbar into the current JIT (was thinking along the lines of parsing > relocatable ELF into memory and running a link step manually, then > "informing" the JIT about the memory object...) > > I have "MCJIT"-like code in my own project (sadly not open-source...) writing code...

Hello I just read this article about a kid in England who built a box with a 3G SIM card: www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1394448/Doorbell-tricks-burglars-thinking-youre-home-invented-schoolboy-Laurence-Rook-13.html When someone rings your intercom, the box will call your cellphone so you can answer just like you were home. I don't know anything about electronics and would like to

...JIT to recompile dynamically). Not only >> this but it allows the resaving of any functions that may have been >> JIT-optimised during runtime so they can be used immediately next run. >> >> This, coincidentally, is something that I was pondering on a way to try to >> crowbar into the current JIT (was thinking along the lines of parsing >> relocatable ELF into memory and running a link step manually, then >> "informing" the JIT about the memory object...) >> > > I have "MCJIT"-like code in my own project (sadly not open-source...

...to print. The Corel version of Wine includes a font manager and the required printer drivers, but it is not clear how to install a Windows program under this version of Wine. This document describes one way to shoehorn QuickBooks into the Corel Wordperfect 2000 installation on Mandrake 7.2. This crowbar and sledgehammer installation method should work with most any Windows program... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Corel Office 2000 Basics First install Wordperfect Office 2000 on your Linux PC. In order to do this, you may require special RPM installat...

...use of ahead-of-time compilation (using the JIT to recompile dynamically). Not only this but it allows the resaving of any functions that may have been JIT-optimised during runtime so they can be used immediately next run. This, coincidentally, is something that I was pondering on a way to try to crowbar into the current JIT (was thinking along the lines of parsing relocatable ELF into memory and running a link step manually, then "informing" the JIT about the memory object...) Sounds excellent. James Molloy Graduate Compiler Engineer, ARM Ltd. > -----Original Message----- > Fro...

John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/22/2017 1:16 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> a) Please don't top post. >> b) 'T'ain't funny, McGee. They don't have the budget, and they need this >> server*now*... it's one of their compute nodes, and at least one person >> is dead in the water. > > you can't afford a replacement for a 6-8 year old server

...rom the disks) > > So things that are important: Make sure the hardware to each drive is as > independent as possible. Hard to do these days as there is probably only > one SATA controller chip on the motherboard. You also need to see what > happens when a drive dies - is it going to crowbar the entire SATA chip > and block the other drive? Is the driver going to recognise it quickly > enough and so on. (Some early SATA drives weren't good at this) > > And the "usual" - make sure all the hardware has it's own interrupts. > > For the absolute maximun...

...article have all been changed to 192.168.1.9 > > (server) and 192.168.1.1 target > > > > PC is Ubuntu 14.04 on flash drive with xinetd and tftp-hpa > > > > What am I doing incorrectly? > >Assuming that it is the same technology as a saw or a hammer. :-) Maybe crowbar and hammer! :) >And you are doing fine. You are curious, you presist, >you want to get it working. > > >Your Ubuntu PC, the computer at 192.168.1.9, can you connect to it from the >notyetOpenWRT device? These three tests will tell us more I don't know how to try this. &g...

...ings my employer pays me to do. This is what I?m telling you: the job description is, ?Cope with change.? > > So either it "isn't hard", or "you need a trained, experienced, > professional staff to do it". Big difference. Which is it? You?re trying to shove a crowbar in where there is no gap: It isn?t hard for an experienced staff. It is one of the reasons our various organizations employ us. Why do you believe this is a stringent requirement? I thought CentOS was the distro targeted at organizations staffed by competent technical professionals. That?s me....

Hi We have a number offices accommodating 4-6 people each hence it is very important for PBX to be fanless and silent. We have been looking at using IDE flash disks also called DOM. The performance tests we have done so far satisfy our requirements, however we are concerned with DOM durability. We have installed debian and vanilla asterisk on 1GB DOM. All seems to work fine at the moment however

Dear All, I would like to get community's feedback with regard to RAID1 ( Software or Hardware) implementations with asterisk. This is my setup Motherboard with SATA RAID1 support CENT OS 4.4 Asterisk 1.2.19 Libpri/zaptel latest release 2.8 Ghz Intel processor 2 80 GB SATA Hard disks 256 MB RAM digium PRI/E1 card Following are the concerns I am having I'm planing to put this asterisk

Hi all, I've been spending some time with customers lately and I've discovered an interesting thing. Many IT departments completely delegate the settings on directory and file ACLs to the users who are interested in the data. For example, on a given share for "Finance", the finance group is given full control on the containing directory (ie. they're allowed to set ACLs on

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Dec 29, 2014, at 10:07 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > >> it's not necessary for either code interfaces or data structures >> to change in backward-incompatible ways. > > You keep talking about the cost of coping with change, but apparently you believe

Hi all, As promised, here is the rough design of the upcoming MC-JIT*. Feedback appreciated! (*) To be clear, we are only calling it the MC-JIT until we have finished killing the old one. When I say JIT below, I mean the MC-JIT. I basically am ignoring completely the existing JIT. I will keep things API compatible whenever possible, of course. I see two main design directions for the JIT: --

Hi, The following patch series fixes hangup after creating checkpoint on Xen. The Linux Xen guest can be saved the state to restore later, and also created snapshot like checkpoint via the hypervisor. But, when the snapshot is created for the PV guest, it will hangup. We added ''PMSG_CANCEL'' message and ''cancel'' handler in dev_pm_ops struct in the pm-linux