search for: creditability

Hi, This patch intends to accurate vcpu weighting for CPU intensive job. The reason of this problem is that vcpu round-robin queue blocks large weight vcpus by small weight vcpus. For example, we assume following case on 2pcpu environment. (with 4domains (each domain has 2vcpus)) dom1 vcpu0,1 w128 credit 4 dom2 vcpu0,1 w128 credit 4 dom3 vcpu0,1 w256 credit 8 dom4 vcpu0,1 w512 credit 15

Martin Pelmore, Credit Cards For Students Offer Convenience And Safety Credit cards for students are a great deal for many individuals and groups. Parents will find that credit cards provide a convenient way to provide for their children away at school. Credit cards for students eliminate the necessity of students carrying around a lot of cash to pay for their tuition, fees and miscellaneous

hjhfjfhjf773 Our system lets you clean your Bad Credit ONLINE Delete your Bad Credit Online Directly from Bureaus Online Credit Repair Approved by Credit Bureaus. Credit Breakthrough Clear BAD Credit Online Fast. I cleared up my credit right from my computer Use your Computer to fix your Bad Credit. Credit scores going through roof with our online credit repair Clean your Bad

In order to avoid high-frequency cpu migration, vcpus may in fact be scheduled slightly out-of-order. Account for this situation properly. Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> credit2: Fix erronous ASSERT In order to avoid high-frequency cpu migration, vcpus may in fact be scheduled slightly out-of-order. Account for this situation properly. v2: - Update comment

Add a xen command-line parameter, sched_credit_tslice_ms, to set the timeslice of the credit1 scheduler. Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> diff -r 4a4882df5649 -r 782284c5b1bc xen/common/sched_credit.c --- a/xen/common/sched_credit.c Wed Aug 31 15:23:49 2011 +0100 +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit.c Thu Sep 01 16:29:50 2011 +0100 @@ -41,15 +41,9 @@ */ #define

Hi All, My question is in regards to an error generated when using randomForest in R. Is there a special way to format the data in order to avoid this error, or am I completely confused on what the error implies? "Error in randomForest.default(m, y, ...) : Can not handle categorical predictors with more than 32 categories." This is generated from the command line: >

The `1' and `2' columns are the error rates within those classes. E.g., the last row of the `1' column should correspond to the class.error for "-", and the last row of the `2' column to the class.error for "+". (I would have thought that that should be fairly obvious, but I guess not. It mimics what Breiman and Cutler's Fortran code does.) I suspect

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 06:19:03PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:49:02AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:04:29AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:30:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > >

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 06:19:03PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:49:02AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:04:29AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:30:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > >

Hi! I`m using xen 3.0.2 on a Debian Sarge 3,1 (XEON machine)! By default my scheduler is "sedf", ok?! I would like to change it to the "credit"! I tried to set the parameter "sched=credit" in my grub config, but when I try to use the command "xm sched-credit -d <domain>" and others, it doesn`t work! But if I try "xm sched-sedf -l" it

And also put my name behind the mainternship. Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> --- MAINTAINERS | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 0358a3e..e2252fc 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -193,8 +193,9 @@ F: xen/include/xen/iommu.h LINUX (PV_OPS) M: Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Modified function runq_candidate in the credit 2 scheduler to have it consider hard and soft affinity when choosing the next vCPU from the run queue to run on the given pCPU. Function now chooses the vCPU with the most credit that has hard affinity and maybe soft affinity for the given pCPU. If it does not have soft affinity and there is another vCPU that prefers to run on the given pCPU, then as

Address some credit2 issues. This patch series, along with the recent changes to the cpupools interface, should address some of the strange credit2 instability. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi list I plan to implement a prepaid solution where the system needs to check for remaining credit periodically during a call. The reason for this is that this is a system where the credit pool can be used simultaneously by more people, and not only for calling. I have a problem figuring how to be able to run logic while a call is in progress. The L(x:y:z) option to Dial() is good, but not

Un texte encapsul? et encod? dans un jeu de caract?res inconnu a ?t? nettoy?... Nom : non disponible URL : <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20081014/df8fd0b2/attachment.pl>

Hi, [reposting to list, posting via google groups apparently didn''t work] I''m trying to use acts_as_list for the first time. Can anyone confirm the odd behaviour reported here? http://blog.nominet.org.uk/tech/Web/2006/03/06/Using_acts_as_list_in_... i.e. element access and move_higher require an odd indexing scheme to work. I''m personally finding that I

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 03:10:15PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 06:50:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 06:19:03PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:49:02AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > >

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 03:10:15PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 06:50:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 06:19:03PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:49:02AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > >

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:04:29AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:30:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > Since virtio-vsock was introduced, the buffers filled by the host > > > and pushed to the guest using the vring, are directly queued in > > > a

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:04:29AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:30:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > Since virtio-vsock was introduced, the buffers filled by the host > > > and pushed to the guest using the vring, are directly queued in > > > a