search for: creativecommons

Okay, this will never come to an end otherwise: I would like to use <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/> as the license for the complete content of the wiki. The content on the wiki is *NOT* licensed at all at the moment. So this call goes out to *ALL* people who have already contributed to the wiki: Is it okay with you to use this license for your content on the wiki?...

...cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nutshell/index.html says that the license is "file LICENSE". This is further explained at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nutshell/LICENSE as [snip] The audioscrobbler data is made avaialable under the following Creative Commons license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/ All other data files are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us [/snip] So, which version of the creative commons license is appropriate ? Thanks and regards, -- Pai

...rg/MarketingMaterial> and asked me about the licensing of content on there. Which made me think "Well, let us restart this discussion again". We *do* need a license for content on the wiki. The three licenses we're favouring (well, sort of) are: The GNU Free Documentation License CreativeCommons with attribution Open Documentation License I'm still favouring nr. 2, as it is the easiest to understand and is available in several languages. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Siz...

...tle> <dc:date>1001-10-01</dc:date> </Agent> </dc:rights> <cc:license rdf:resource="http://flf.org/licenses/whiteHouseLawn" /> And creative commons recommends a specification like this: <!-- Creative Commons License --> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/"> <img alt="Creative Commons License" border="0" src="http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights.gif" /></a><br /> This work is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/&q...

...-01</dc:date> > ? </Agent> > </dc:rights> > ?<cc:license rdf:resource="http://flf.org/licenses/whiteHouseLawn" /> > > And creative commons recommends a specification like this: > <!-- Creative Commons License --> > <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/"> > <img alt="Creative Commons License" border="0" > src="http://creativecommons.org/images/public/somerights.gif" /></a><br > /> This work is licensed under a > <a href="http://creativecommons.org/l...

...ike it or not, Ubuntu is arguably one of the more successful distributions. b. When we compile any software we have the freedom and choice to add in flags which make it better for the individual. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17

...elog so I can ask for packaging in the distribution but there is no changelog in the Changelog. It was empty. The only thing which was relevant was in the News. Why the changelog is kept if its not gonna be used? -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal This email is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17

...code to vorbis as well as theora ? Would be interesting to watch and know if somebody steps up to the plate. Atleast in India, wordpress has made quite an impression as a solution for websites. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17

...that is CentOS specific should/would be in our release note wiki page for that version. Read the "Legal Notice" section for example on that page : http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/index.html As well as the CC-by-SA license here : http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ What are your ideas on that ? Fabian

...d to could CC0 be > added to the list of R licences. Right now the only CC licence that > is in the R licenses is CC-BY-SA-4.0. Hmm, I see Name: CC0 FSF: free_and_GPLv3_compatible (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CC0) OSI: NA (https://opensource.org/faq#cc-zero) URL: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode FOSS: yes in the R license db ... -k > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Brian G. Peterson <brian at braverock.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 22:46 -0500, Kevin Ushey wrote: >>> It appears that Unlicense is considered a f...

Daniel, these are all good ideas and worth progressing. However, it may be better not to merge too many goals in one format (MPEG-7 did that and ended up as a big mess). So, I suggest to start by structuring the types of things you want - then finding out which parts belong where into existing formats such as vorbis comment, Skeleton and CMML, and only then start to develop a new format. For

...I want to rsync. Only DVD-1 does anybody know how can I achieve that and if there is a simpler way to do it (perhaps something that I don't know ?) Looking forward to answers. -- ? ? ? ? ? Regards, ? ? ? ? ? Shirish Agarwal? ????? ??????? ? My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3? 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17

...trol (for example, for Red Hat Content licensed under a Creative Commons License, you will have the rights set forth in the applicable Creative Commons License)." --------------------------- The way I understand it, most RHEL documentation has a more permissive license, like CC-BY-SA: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ and can be redistributed under certain conditions. However, the terms of use still apply to using the Red Hat websites (=bandwidth). But if someone is a Red Hat customer, he can legally access the site, fetch the documentation and redistribute it to everyone. Since RHEL an...

Is the new NIN Ghosts music (free download) safe for MOH? Justin ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...ecurity at gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org. License ======= Copyright 2005 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text belongs to its owner(s). The contents of this document are licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0 -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith...

Hi guys I have written a multimedia howto for centos 5, i was asked a while back to post it on the wiki from within the centos irc room. i have registered an account and would like to contribute it. For those interested the link of the current howto is posted below. http://www.sklav.com/?q=node/2

...That's why I want to reopen discussion: So far we found 4 licenses which should be inspected a little bit deeper (pros and cons are from me). This is if we *want* to have the content in the wiki under some form of license. The Creative Commons license which CC suggests for wikis: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/> Pro: Easy to understand, easy to embed. Three-Layer system: Easy user readable license backed by a license for lawyers and a machine readable part (can be searched for by google and yahoo, for example. Available for ~70 different jurisdictions/countr...

Hello, I'm setting up an icecast server and i'd like for it to do something. I am looking for publically available content or noncopyrighted-nonpatonted content I can load on to the server and stream without worrying about copyright violations. Also, what are the current security recommendations and best practices for icecast and to a lesser extent ices? Thanks. Dave.

...bandwidth demands & vice-versa" Now if I know that my videos do not have much moving elements can I get similar bandwidth savings in theora ? If yes, how do I go about doing the same. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17

...Is there a link where I can read more about the same? Also are there any end-user tools (GUI-based) which can do this ? If yes, links of those as well. Looking forward to hearing more on that. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17