search for: cranking

You have been selected to receive this message because of your interest in BMX. http://w3.one.net/~thunder We are starting a new web site called Cranked Online BMX Magazine. Currently there are only a few links and a chat room (which seems to work really well). In the near future we plan to add a track directory, product reviews, pro interviews, photo shoots, etc. Now is the time we need to

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/1520/screenshot10ul7.png It's the same on all resolutions, even on high ones, but I'm legally blind so I have to use 800x600 ~_~ Reinstalling Wine didn't help, completely removing it and reinstalling it didn't do squat, installing some msfont thing didn't do anything either. anyway, I'm a total noob at this linux thing, the only reason i

...isk sip extension >hears them selves echoing. The remote party does not notice any >difference. >I have also notices that the Asterisk >levels are very hot from T1-PRI to Sip. I have had good success fiddling with the txgain and rxgain values in zapata.conf on my PRI. In my setup, cranking the gain down a LOT eliminated most of the echo, and training the users to turn down the gain on their handsets did the rest. It's true, with a PRI, that gains are cranked across the board. Turning the gain down solves a lot of echo problems, with negligible effect on voice quality. In zapata...

I was wondering if anyone was aware of a method for mounting virtual CD devices with CD image files. I keep images (.CUE/.BIN pairs) of my CD collection on a NAS appliance tucked away in my closet. I'd like to write a script to mount each one, create ID tags, rip the tracks, then move along to the next one. I figure with a quad core opteron, it should be able to crank through them in a

While the rest of you were chatting about the smallest * server, I was sitting her staring at the telephone hanging on the wall. It is a Western Electric set in a varnished pine box with an earpiece you hold in your left hand and a mouthpiece attached to the box. You crank the magneto with your right hand to signal the switchboard. The two dry cells inside are dated 1935, and I'm

...ages for a given moving window size "a" (a is the window size within a column of data in a matrix - the filter is applied to all columns automatically) I could not find anything analogous for calculating variances over a moving window. Is there one available? Otherwise, I'm slowly cranking away on making my own, but it's quite tedious! Thank you in advance for any insights! -Philippe

Hi, all. I've got a customer who's complaining of low volume, especially for conference calls. If this were a Zap system, I'd just bump up txgain in their zaptel.conf file... but it isn't. Should I crank the volume of the phones (they're Polycoms), or is there some other, more graceful, system-wide setting I could use to increase gain? Thanks! -Ken -- This message has

FYI: I'm using samba 2.0.6 for clearcase interoperation between Unix and NT, and while it works great 99% of the time, I run into a problem whenever I do a complete build on an NT system, which involves compiling ~1500 files. The first 1100 or so are compiled correctly, but then the following errors show up on the NT box: The system cannot open the device or file specified. And the

Hey guys, I'm having some trouble with gain settings using a Wildcard X100P and Zaptel 1.4 Beta 2 on Asterisk 1.4 beta 3. My transmit volume between an IAX client (idefisk) and a POTS device through my 1.4 box is great, but my receive volume is terrible. I can hardly hear a word they say. I've cranked my gains up to 100, inserted the wcfxo module with boost=1, but haven't had

...ne. Does tinkering with the gain undo the tunings done by fxotune? Similarly with ztmonitor: Is tinkering with the gain using ztmonitor going to undo the tuning done by fxotune, or can I do both? Have you encountered gain issues like this on analog lines, and if so, how did you address them? Is cranking the rx gain on the Polycom phones a viable solution, or is it likely to make echo worse? I've tried a few adjustments, and they seemed to aggravate echo; once even so badly that the remote party could hear echo. -Stephen-

On 19 April 2013 17:48, Török Edwin <edwin at etorok.net> wrote: > Otherwise what might seem like a 20% improvement > could very well be just a 0.2% improvement in practice. > This is (maybe to a lesser extent) what happens with most of our benchmarks, and running them 3 times doesn't add that much confidence but makes it run much slower. I end up treating the test-suite as

...aching 100% CPU usage (aka using a full core) when trying to spawn off new IMAP processes. This was rectified by giving IMAP a service count of 200 to create a pool of "idling" processes eventually, reducing the strain for the master process dramatically. That of course required generous cranking up ulimits, FDs in particular. The next issues of course is (as mentioned before) the memory usage of all those IMAP processes and the fact that quite a few things outside of dovecote (ps, etc) tend to get quite sedate when dealing with tens of thousands of processes. We just started to deploy...

I have followed the FAQs and HOW-TOs, including the Sign and Seal registry patch, but I am unable to make this work. RedHat 9.0 Samba 3.0.0rc4 XP Pro SP1 When I setup the PC and join the domain, it gives me the 'Welcome to the Domain' message, but I really don't think that this has worked because of errors in the log file, (yes I can provide, and yes I am using the smb user root).

Hi, A weird problem ... My PDC is running samba 3.0 cvs from a couple of weeks ago. the os level is set to 65 and that machine has been the master for my domain for ages, until last night. A win2k client machine stoll the domain and made itself the master for the domain, hence a few problems. I have cranked the os level to 80, however I'm pretty sure that is not supported/a bad idea/not to be

Greetings, I am having a problem with rsync deleting entire folders and files and then attempting to recopy the entire contents of the folder(s) even though they are up to date. The task is syncing from ubuntu (rsync version 3.1.1) to windows using cygwin (rsync version 3.1.2). I have a number of these configurations, and they all work except this one. I use the modify-window=600 and cannot

Trying to crank it up on our RedHat 8.0 system... I get the following.. I am sure it is something simple in the config.. just don't know what... Any help would be greatly appreciated.. Here is from the log.. If there is a way to get more log info that might help he as well.. Jan 29 14:30:34 smtp dovecot: Dovecot starting up Jan 29 14:30:34 smtp dovecot: dovecot startup succeeded Jan 29

I'm a bit confused on how to use lapply with a data.frame. For example. lapply(data, function(x) print(x)) WHAT exactly is passed to the function. Is it each ROW in the data frame, one by one, or each column, or the entire frame in one shot? What I want to do apply a function to each row in the data frame. Is lapply the right way. A second application is to normalize a column value by

On Jun 9, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Greg Hersch wrote: > (gdb) bt > #0 libusb_get_string (udev=0x43110, StringIdx=0, buf=0x40204 <buf> > "", buflen=20) at libusb.c:496 > #1 0x00015330 in HIDGetIndexString (udev=<optimized out>, > Index=<optimized out>, buf=0x40204 <buf> "", buflen=<optimized out>) > at libhid.c:407 > #2 0x00012e18

...core) when trying to spawn off new IMAP processes. > > > > This was rectified by giving IMAP a service count of 200 to create a pool > > of "idling" processes eventually, reducing the strain for the master > > process dramatically. That of course required generous cranking up > > ulimits, FDs in particular. > > > > The next issues of course is (as mentioned before) the memory usage of > all > > those IMAP processes and the fact that quite a few things outside of > > dovecote (ps, etc) tend to get quite sedate when dealing with tens of...

...p the CPU on either side--on the server, there are as many smbd's as clients and they are splitting the CPU's evenly (server is a 16-core machine with 32G of ram and a big hardware raid hanging off 2 high-end areca cards). the server sits at a load average of about 2 when all the nodes are cranking and interactive use (on the server) is fine then, though fileservice speed is definitely maxed out at wirespeed when i run tests on a quiet network (spread between all the clients. single clients only manage around 350Mbit/sec, but i attribute that to windows, not the server, since it can talk scp...