search for: crank

You have been selected to receive this message because of your interest in BMX. http://w3.one.net/~thunder We are starting a new web site called Cranked Online BMX Magazine. Currently there are only a few links and a chat room (which seems to work really well). In the near future we plan to add a track directory, product reviews, pro interviews, photo shoots, etc. Now is the time we need to hear from you. If you are a person that is intereste...

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/1520/screenshot10ul7.png It's the same on all resolutions, even on high ones, but I'm legally blind so I have to use 800x600 ~_~ Reinstalling Wine didn't help, completely removing it and reinstalling it didn't do squat, installing some msfont thing didn't do anything either. anyway, I'm a total noob at this linux thing, the only reason i

...isk sip extension >hears them selves echoing. The remote party does not notice any >difference. >I have also notices that the Asterisk >levels are very hot from T1-PRI to Sip. I have had good success fiddling with the txgain and rxgain values in zapata.conf on my PRI. In my setup, cranking the gain down a LOT eliminated most of the echo, and training the users to turn down the gain on their handsets did the rest. It's true, with a PRI, that gains are cranked across the board. Turning the gain down solves a lot of echo problems, with negligible effect on voice quality. In zap...

...ces with CD image files. I keep images (.CUE/.BIN pairs) of my CD collection on a NAS appliance tucked away in my closet. I'd like to write a script to mount each one, create ID tags, rip the tracks, then move along to the next one. I figure with a quad core opteron, it should be able to crank through them in a few days (it's a few thousand CD's worth of images). Anyone done this before with their trusty CentOS box? I'd be using CentOS 5. Best,

While the rest of you were chatting about the smallest * server, I was sitting her staring at the telephone hanging on the wall. It is a Western Electric set in a varnished pine box with an earpiece you hold in your left hand and a mouthpiece attached to the box. You crank the magneto with your right hand to signal the switchboard. The two dry cells inside are dated 1935, and I'm throwing them away because they're leaking acid. Wouldn't it be a kick to be able to ring this phone from an * server and have a conversation. There are several lugs inside:...

...ages for a given moving window size "a" (a is the window size within a column of data in a matrix - the filter is applied to all columns automatically) I could not find anything analogous for calculating variances over a moving window. Is there one available? Otherwise, I'm slowly cranking away on making my own, but it's quite tedious! Thank you in advance for any insights! -Philippe

Hi, all. I've got a customer who's complaining of low volume, especially for conference calls. If this were a Zap system, I'd just bump up txgain in their zaptel.conf file... but it isn't. Should I crank the volume of the phones (they're Polycoms), or is there some other, more graceful, system-wide setting I could use to increase gain? Thanks! -Ken -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

FYI: I'm using samba 2.0.6 for clearcase interoperation between Unix and NT, and while it works great 99% of the time, I run into a problem whenever I do a complete build on an NT system, which involves compiling ~1500 files. The first 1100 or so are compiled correctly, but then the following errors show up on the NT box: The system cannot open the device or file specified. And the

...I'm having some trouble with gain settings using a Wildcard X100P and Zaptel 1.4 Beta 2 on Asterisk 1.4 beta 3. My transmit volume between an IAX client (idefisk) and a POTS device through my 1.4 box is great, but my receive volume is terrible. I can hardly hear a word they say. I've cranked my gains up to 100, inserted the wcfxo module with boost=1, but haven't had any luck figuring this out. Using ztmonitor, the best I can get on my RX side is 3 #'s (###)) and that's if I really talk loudly into the phone. Any pointers on other places I can look? Volume is great...

...hat remote party is. - If the remote party is on a circuit on the same local exchange, the volume is perfect or nearly perfect. - If the party is on a remote exchange, the volume can vary, from barely audible, to audible but still too quiet to be really comfortable. In these cases, the users will crank the handset or headset volume on their Polycoms to make the remote party audible, but that ends up causing distortion which is bad enough to be irritating. The volume level does seem to depend on the exchange. For instance, all calls to a specific exchange are at the same general volume level. Now...

...run much slower. I end up treating the test-suite as functionality and correctness test, rather than useful benchmark data. I agree it would be great to have a decent benchmark infrastructure for LLVM, but I'm not sure the test-suite is the appropriate place. Maybe a different type of run that crank the inputs up to 11 and let the applications run for longer, to be run once a week or so wouldn't be a bad idea, though. cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130419/2bbe41ef/a...

...aching 100% CPU usage (aka using a full core) when trying to spawn off new IMAP processes. This was rectified by giving IMAP a service count of 200 to create a pool of "idling" processes eventually, reducing the strain for the master process dramatically. That of course required generous cranking up ulimits, FDs in particular. The next issues of course is (as mentioned before) the memory usage of all those IMAP processes and the fact that quite a few things outside of dovecote (ps, etc) tend to get quite sedate when dealing with tens of thousands of processes. We just started to depl...

...he smb user root). Then when I reboot and attempt to login with a domain user, I get refused with the 'Windows cannot connect to the domain,.....' error. In the log file for the machine_name, the last error is 'Can't become connected user'. Higher up (when logging verbosity is cranked up) in the log file, it 'appears' that the computer is attempting to connect to the domain, but it somehow ends up using the 'Guest' account?! I don't know if this is normal. Anyways, sharing appears to be working, because if I log into a local machine account, I cat 'NE...

..., A weird problem ... My PDC is running samba 3.0 cvs from a couple of weeks ago. the os level is set to 65 and that machine has been the master for my domain for ages, until last night. A win2k client machine stoll the domain and made itself the master for the domain, hence a few problems. I have cranked the os level to 80, however I'm pretty sure that is not supported/a bad idea/not to be done sort of thing. Can anyone suggest any ideas Cheers ------------- Kristyan Osborne IT Technician Longhill High School 01273 391672 ------ Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working proper...

...syncing from ubuntu (rsync version 3.1.1) to windows using cygwin (rsync version 3.1.2). I have a number of these configurations, and they all work except this one. I use the modify-window=600 and cannot understand the deletion (the times on the machines are within seconds of each other). I have cranked up the verbosity level (-vvvvvv) hoping I could find something that explains why the files/folders are all being deleted. Example of the log entries: delete_item(fullpath/file) mode=100755 flags=4 I am assuming the 755 is the file permissions. I have no idea what the high order digit m...

Trying to crank it up on our RedHat 8.0 system... I get the following.. I am sure it is something simple in the config.. just don't know what... Any help would be greatly appreciated.. Here is from the log.. If there is a way to get more log info that might help he as well.. Jan 29 14:30:34 smtp dovecot: Do...

...6.2 etc... The long version would be: foreach (group in unique(data$group)){ data$norm[group==group] <- data$value[group==group] / sum(data$value[group==group]) } There must be a faster way to do this with lapply. (Ideally, I'd then use mclapply to run on multi-cores and really crank up the speed.) Any suggestions?

...v=<optimized out>) at > main.c:708 You did everything right on the backtrace, but that is puzzling. At #2, ups_infoval_set() apparently calls HIDGetIndexString(), but I don't see where it does that in the code. There must be some pointers, or something. The easiest thing might be to crank the debug output up a bit more (5x -D, even) but since that will be a bit more output, please redirect it to a file, and gzip the log before attaching it. Doesn't need to be long, just enough to see one or two errors. Another idea is to recompile without optimizations, to see if that helps the...

...core) when trying to spawn off new IMAP processes. > > > > This was rectified by giving IMAP a service count of 200 to create a pool > > of "idling" processes eventually, reducing the strain for the master > > process dramatically. That of course required generous cranking up > > ulimits, FDs in particular. > > > > The next issues of course is (as mentioned before) the memory usage of > all > > those IMAP processes and the fact that quite a few things outside of > > dovecote (ps, etc) tend to get quite sedate when dealing with tens...

...p the CPU on either side--on the server, there are as many smbd's as clients and they are splitting the CPU's evenly (server is a 16-core machine with 32G of ram and a big hardware raid hanging off 2 high-end areca cards). the server sits at a load average of about 2 when all the nodes are cranking and interactive use (on the server) is fine then, though fileservice speed is definitely maxed out at wirespeed when i run tests on a quiet network (spread between all the clients. single clients only manage around 350Mbit/sec, but i attribute that to windows, not the server, since it can talk...