Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "cpu18".
Did you mean:
cpu1
2014 Aug 04
1
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
...ver generally uses one of them to process trivial network thins,
> and others to transmit/receive data.
>
> So, in this case, it seems to driver need to touch the IRQ numbers.
>
> wr-linux:~ # cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 .... CPU17 CPU18 CPU19 CPU20 CPU21 CPU22 CPU23
> ......
> 100: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> 101: 2 0 0 0 0...
2014 Aug 04
1
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
...ver generally uses one of them to process trivial network thins,
> and others to transmit/receive data.
>
> So, in this case, it seems to driver need to touch the IRQ numbers.
>
> wr-linux:~ # cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 .... CPU17 CPU18 CPU19 CPU20 CPU21 CPU22 CPU23
> ......
> 100: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> 101: 2 0 0 0 0...
2014 Aug 01
2
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
On Wednesday 30 July 2014, Yijing Wang wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The other part I'm not completely sure about is how you want to
> >>> have MSIs map into normal IRQ descriptors. At the moment, all
> >>> MSI users are based on IRQ numbers, but this has known scalability problems.
> >>
> >> Hmmm, I still use the IRQ number to map the
2014 Aug 01
2
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
On Wednesday 30 July 2014, Yijing Wang wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The other part I'm not completely sure about is how you want to
> >>> have MSIs map into normal IRQ descriptors. At the moment, all
> >>> MSI users are based on IRQ numbers, but this has known scalability problems.
> >>
> >> Hmmm, I still use the IRQ number to map the
2014 Aug 04
0
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
...ferent things.
Eg. network driver generally uses one of them to process trivial network thins,
and others to transmit/receive data.
So, in this case, it seems to driver need to touch the IRQ numbers.
wr-linux:~ # cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 .... CPU17 CPU18 CPU19 CPU20 CPU21 CPU22 CPU23
......
100: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0
101: 2 0 0 0 0 0 302830488...
2016 Sep 07
2
how to limit cpu usage for specified processes
Hi,
Is there some tool or method in centos that can limit cpu usage to some percentage for specified processes that consume large cpu resource?
I found cpulimit which is only able to limit one process. what I want is one tool that can limit several same processes' cpu usage. Thanks!
Regards
andrew
2012 Nov 13
1
thread taskq / unp_gc() using 100% cpu and stalling unix socket IPC
...le: cpu1}
11 root 155 ki31 0K 384K RUN 19 18.3H 31.59% idle{idle: cpu19}
11 root 155 ki31 0K 384K RUN 8 18.4H 30.96% idle{idle: cpu8}
7619 dovenull 81 0 59048K 32864K CPU20 20 2:01 30.96% imap-login
11 root 155 ki31 0K 384K CPU18 18 18.3H 30.76% idle{idle: cpu18}
11 root 155 ki31 0K 384K RUN 13 18.3H 30.57% idle{idle: cpu13}
11 root 155 ki31 0K 384K RUN 12 18.3H 30.47% idle{idle: cpu12}
11 root 155 ki31 0K 384K RUN 20 18.3H 30.08% idle{idle: cpu20}
11 ro...
2008 Aug 22
3
sun4v arch
I would also like to help as well.
As KMacy knows before i asked a lot of questions for T2 types of
servers but unfortunately i have no more access to those kind of
hardware as well.
I;m willing to participate if a team will be formated.
2013 Mar 12
14
vpmu=1 and running 'perf top' within a PVHVM guest eventually hangs dom0 and hypervisor has stuck vCPUS. Romley-EP (model=45, stepping=2)
...owner_map[b], no_cmci_map[14]
(XEN) CMCI: find owner on CPU15
(XEN) CMCI: CPU15 owner_map[0], no_cmci_map[14]
(XEN) CMCI: find owner on CPU16
(XEN) CMCI: CPU16 owner_map[fffeb], no_cmci_map[14]
(XEN) CMCI: find owner on CPU17
(XEN) CMCI: CPU17 owner_map[0], no_cmci_map[14]
(XEN) CMCI: find owner on CPU18
(XEN) CMCI: CPU18 owner_map[b], no_cmci_map[14]
(XEN) CMCI: find owner on CPU19
(XEN) CMCI: CPU19 owner_map[0], no_cmci_map[14]
(XEN) CMCI: find owner on CPU20
(XEN) CMCI: CPU20 owner_map[b], no_cmci_map[14]
(XEN) CMCI: find owner on CPU21
(XEN) CMCI: CPU21 owner_map[0], no_cmci_map[14]
(XEN) CMCI:...
2010 Nov 16
0
Bug#603713: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64: amd64 Dom0-Kernel crashes in early boot-stage
...XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767 microcode: CPU11 resumed
(XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767 microcode: CPU3 resumed
(XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767 microcode: CPU17 resumed
(XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767 microcode: CPU5 resumed
(XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767 microcode: CPU6 resumed
(XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767 microcode: CPU18 resumed
(XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767 microcode: CPU19 resumed
(XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767 microcode: CPU15 resumed
(XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767 microcode: CPU7 resumed
(XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767 microcode: CPU4 resumed
(XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767 microcode: CPU12 resumed
(XEN) microcode.c:73:d32767...
2011 Jul 07
6
Xen unstable on NetBSD
Hello,
I''m trying to compile Xen unstable on NetBSD, I''ve aplied the patches
from http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/sysutils/xentools41/patches/?only_with_tag=MAIN
and copied the blk files from
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/sysutils/xentools41/files/?only_with_tag=MAIN
(I don''t know which of these patches have been applied to xen
unstable, so