Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "cportability".
Did you mean:
portability
2011 Jan 19
0
[LLVMdev] Building 176.gcc
On 01/18/2011 06:38 PM, Bin Zeng wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have been stumped on a compilation problem when I tried to build
> 176.gcc of SPEC CPU2000 with clang v 2.8 (trunk 427) on Linux and intel.
> First, I tried to compile with 'clang -std=c89 *.c -o gcc.clang' since
> the default C standard of Clang is c99 while that of gcc is c89. It
> reported this error:
>
2011 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] Building 176.gcc
Hi folks,
I have been stumped on a compilation problem when I tried to build
176.gcc of SPEC CPU2000 with clang v 2.8 (trunk 427) on Linux and intel.
First, I tried to compile with 'clang -std=c89 *.c -o gcc.clang' since
the default C standard of Clang is c99 while that of gcc is c89. It
reported this error:
./c-gperf.h:14:1: error: unknown type name 'inline'
inline
^