search for: counterproduct

Hi all, Will over-allocation of vCPUs be counterproductive to VM Win7 Ultimate? I allocated 32 (out of 64 physical cores in 8 NUMA cells, and 128G out of 2T physical RAM) to the VM. But the boot process was extremly slow, actually the desktop screen never showed up then the VM just reboot automatically. So is there anything I can do to solve this proble...

hi, currently, the DAGCombiner unconditionally converts (DAGCombiner::visit(U|S)REM) expressions of the form X % C for constants C into X-X/C*C. this makes sense in certain cases where the div/mul logic will simplify X/C*X but is counterproductive in general, especially if the multiply is expensive. also, this doesn't allow targets to custom lower rem operations. shouldn't this transformation be left for the legalizer (where it's implemented anyway)? regards, - dietmar

Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: > Using a development branch and then slamming those changes into trunk > is at odds with the llvm style incremental development philosophy. In this case, the LLVM incremental style is counterproductive, for both users and developers. Who is interested on watching your API going through intermediate stages and (possibly) experimental points until it stabilizes? > Living on ToT isn't easy. No one ever said it would be. This is no reason for ignoring practices that can improve the experi...

...of multiply instructions and their long cycle times. It seems to me that the ARM64 processor is much more like an x86 one, where using a simpleminded C multiply gives just as good of results. Inline assembly tends to hobble the compiler's optimizer, and in ARM64's case, may actually be counterproductive. The NEON code of course is valuable on all the ARM processors. On 11/10/2015 1:00 PM, opus-request at xiph.org wrote: > Send opus mailing list submissions to > opus at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/list...

On 09.07.20 10:29, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai Basti, > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >> basti via samba >> Verzonden: donderdag 9 juli 2020 10:20 >> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >> Onderwerp: [Samba] AD Users on Linux Laptop >> >> Hello, >> I have setup

...th the combination of these features, we end up with many different flavors, and all these are compiled and sub-packaged separately. Usually, you want parallelization at the top level calling a serial version, as mgcv does. Otherwise, you may end up with an "explosion" of threads that is counterproductive. -- I?aki ?car

...2, FUN=max)) [1] 3 4 3 4 8 8 8 8 Warning message: In FUN(X[[i]], ...) : no non-missing arguments to max; returning -Inf There are no missing values in the result. The fact that ave() apparently tried to find the max for a combination it did not need is irrelvant to the user, and the warning is counterproductive. Terry T.

I am trying to plot data with multiple logical and physical groups using R. Below is a sample of the kind of data I am working with and the desired output. We have a jmp script that can do the same thing, but at ~$200 a year the licensing is counterproductive. Thanks for any help. Data input: Loaded from a CSV file. Physical_1 Logical_1 Logical_2 Data_1 Data_2 x Y Z2 54 56 x Y2 Z2 53 55 x Y3 Z2 52 54 x2 Y Z...

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Dietmar Ebner wrote: > currently, the DAGCombiner unconditionally converts > (DAGCombiner::visit(U|S)REM) expressions of the form X % C for constants > C into X-X/C*C. this makes sense in certain cases where the div/mul > logic will simplify X/C*X but is counterproductive in general, > especially if the multiply is expensive. also, this doesn't allow > targets to custom lower rem operations. shouldn't this transformation be > left for the legalizer (where it's implemented anyway)? Yes, the legalizer should do this transformation. -Chris --...

...td wont start. > Deleting the symlink from the autostart folder, then starting the libvirtd > service works. > Is this a know issue ? It's not very polite to change the topic like this -- if you have a question about a new topic, you should start a new thread. :-) It's also a bit counterproductive, because someone who knows the answer to your question may not even look at this thread, since the subject indicates that it's about virt-xen libvirt 1.3.0, rather than about RHEL's libvirt 1.2.17 (which is what you're asking about). Unfortunately I don't know the answer to your...

.../ \ git clone A git clone B I don't think one can share commits from clone A to/from clone B without going through the parent git-svn repository. Is that right? I recall having read something about that somewhere. If this is a problem, it might be counterproductive to provide a repo.or.cz mirror at all, because people will think it's a "proper" git repository when it really isn't. BTW, the llvm.org git-svn mirror is for trunk only, right? How difficult would it be to include the latest release tag in the git-svn mirror (RELEASE_28 right...

...t https://github.com/dovecot/core/pull/71 Although I removed NoNewPrivileges altogether, since I didn't know what to write in the comment. The only thing I could think of was something along the lines: # If you want most things to stop working, set this to true I thought this would be rather counterproductive, thus I removed it. Maybe somebody else could enlighten me who came up with this default setting and why it was set to true in the first place. Cheers, K. C. -- regards Helmut K. C. Tessarek KeyID 0x172380A011EF4944 Key fingerprint = 8A55 70C1 BD85 D34E ADBC 386C 1723 80A0 11E...

...14 Jun 2007, Dietmar Ebner wrote: >> currently, the DAGCombiner unconditionally converts >> (DAGCombiner::visit(U|S)REM) expressions of the form X % C for constants >> C into X-X/C*C. this makes sense in certain cases where the div/mul >> logic will simplify X/C*X but is counterproductive in general, >> especially if the multiply is expensive. also, this doesn't allow >> targets to custom lower rem operations. shouldn't this transformation be >> left for the legalizer (where it's implemented anyway)? > > Yes, the legalizer should do this tra...

...at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: > >> Using a development branch and then slamming those changes into trunk >> is at odds with the llvm style incremental development philosophy. > > In this case, the LLVM incremental style is counterproductive, for both > users and developers. Who is interested on watching your API going > through intermediate stages and (possibly) experimental points until it > stabilizes? > People who are interested in catching errors quickly before they become expensive things to hunt down. >> L...

Hi, Is there a way to control access to the filebucket? Specifically, I wish to allow agents to backup to the filebucket but never restore. Is this possible to do? Thanks, Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Hello, Could attached patch be reviewed. This patch provides a fix for bug: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3037 Thanks, Jitendra

Hello Everyone As you might already know, git mirrors of llvm repository started from repo.or.cz mirrors, where stuff was pushed almost by hands out of git-svn local copy. Right now we have official and automatically updated GIT mirrors on llvm.org and thus repo.or.cz mirrors look a bit redundant. However, they might still be useful, but definitely not within the current "push mode". It

Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: >> In this case, the LLVM incremental style is counterproductive, for both >> users and developers. Who is interested on watching your API going >> through intermediate stages and (possibly) experimental points until it >> stabilizes? >> > People who are interested in catching errors quickly before they > become expensive things...

...that "array" and "vector" mean the same thing in normal computer > language and compiler theory usage, so it is inconvenient and > misleading within LLVM to give one a very specific meaning that is > different from the other.... I think any sort of separation at all is counterproductive. The existing array/vector split is artificial. It would be better to have one array-like type and allow a reasonable set of operations on it. Target lowering should take care of legality issues. For best performance various transformation patterns will want to know about the target but that&...

Le vendredi 30 juillet 2010 12:25:48, Michael Smith a ?crit : > All that said: Icecast2 is largely unmaintained these days - I don't > know if anyone is interested in going through these and figuring out > which ones are mergeable, which need fixing, and which shouldn't be > used at all. Maybe its time to find include new contributors ? If no one has time to review the