search for: could've

...what other benefits are > there to this strategy? > At the core, is that Syslinux is a general bootloader which gives access to a virtual filesystem.? It supports multiple open files, but not seeking or writing. <<< Please correct me if I'm wrong: Supporting multiple open files could've been done mapping the "whole" file in memory w/o requiring multiple in-progress TFTP transfers right? >>> SOME of the reasons to support multiple files have gone away because of the shuffler and more comprehensive memory management, however. ??? -hpa <<< Do you...

hi, yes we are talking about same host here. You could've just used -cpu host-model-only >> I dont want to host model ( it is working with host model) . AS KVM seems to allow support Haswell with native commands . Does this mean in my case KVM is allowing software emulated cpu model. Can libvirt allow software-emulated for non host model ?...

Technically, it could've sent the mail before you even thought about writing it. Undefined is undefined, there are no requirements. From: Dustin Laurence Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 6:50 AM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is this a bug in clang? On 04/19/2011 10:50 PM, John Regehr wrote: >...

...t; > vendor/vendor.dovecot/pvt/server/sieve/files/MR lookup failed: Mailbox > > attributes not enabled > > Same here (in my case: on OpenBSD -current, mdbox, pigeonhole 0.5.7). > I have backed out to 2.3.6 + pigeonhole 0.5.6 and it's happy again. Instead of downgrading, you could've attempted mail_attribute_dict = file:%h/dovecot-attributes to enable mailbox attributes. This should fix sieve script replication too. Aki

...tion out of the loop. > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:36 AM David Blaikie via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Looks pretty similar to the GCC generated code > > > Challenge accepted => https://godbolt.org/z/8PX2La > Which challenge? Sorry, could've linked to the godbolt I was looking at when I said that: https://godbolt.org/z/_07tOk - comparing GCC and Clang trunk on the code linked in the original post. Looked/looks fairly similar to me. But yeah, I don't know much beyond that. > > -- Jorg > > _______________________...

...please do. > (also, I implemented this by adding private anchors, like my original > version - this does actually have a difference at runtime, of course - > since now each of these types has another entry in their vtable. I think that's a perfectly fine cost :) > Alternatively I could've used their destructors (but then they > wouldn't be inline anymore - but probably most of them are called > virtually anyway so their inline-ness doesn't matter). Also I had to > add about 10 source files in total as implementation files for > header-only cases that neede...

...how much/if any difference in compile time this actually makes. I do wonder. (also, I implemented this by adding private anchors, like my original version - this does actually have a difference at runtime, of course - since now each of these types has another entry in their vtable. Alternatively I could've used their destructors (but then they wouldn't be inline anymore - but probably most of them are called virtually anyway so their inline-ness doesn't matter). Also I had to add about 10 source files in total as implementation files for header-only cases that needed anchors) Also - d...

...the time is right. Does the enclosed implementation implement this part of N3333: http://www.open-std.org/Jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3333.html#per.process.seed ? That to me seems like potentially the most controversial part. I scanned Hashing.h but did not immediately see that support (I could've easily missed it). Howard

Is anyone else experiencing very slow SVN checkouts/updates? I've tried from two separate networks now, and checkouts are 15+ minutes on both. -- Thanks, Justin Holewinski -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130102/46cbecca/attachment.html>

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > Is anyone else experiencing very slow SVN checkouts/updates? I've tried > from two separate networks now, and checkouts are 15+ minutes on both. > > -- > It could've been a temporary hiccup. Just updated and it was reasonably fast (given the large changes from Chandler's header renaming). Eli

> > The internal DNS is NOT supporting round robin. As Rowland said use Bind9 > That's news to me! If so, then the internal DNS backed is not suitable for multiple DC's. (Though, I could've sworn it worked on versions 4.2+ < 4.7. It's on my to-do list to explore this further with different versions.)

I submitted a version of testenc.c to this list MONTHS ago that fixed this problem. It uses a reconfigurable group delay. If you had given me cvs access I could've committed the changes myself. Anyway, the file is attached (again). Maybe this time you'll actually notice the email. Sorry if I seem a little short. It's just very annoying to put the time into learning and improving a new project -- only to have your contributions ignored. <...

...ading our output bytes=153/41319" This happens randomly. Eg. I'm fetching messages, and suddenly, dovecot disconnects. Or my MUA just sits there, and then again, dovecot disconnects me with this message. I didn't even do anything with the client, so I can't think of anything which could've been read. What could be the problem? Daniel

...y previous issues. But alas I have another issue, I need to enforce strong passwords on windows side (i.e. ctrl+alt+delete change password), minimum password length, can't be dictionary words, etc. etc. (Setup is Samba 3.0.0 as PDC with LDAP passdb) >From what I undersatnd previously this could've been done using pam_smbpass or a policy pushed out from netlogon, but I'm dealing with a mixed environment of 2k/XP, and I read that nt4 policies don't work with XP. And it would appear that when using ldap password sync it bypasses pam(?). Also I've seen alot about Group Polic...

...esses at any given time. These are the tuning settings we have in apache: StartServers 10 #MinSpareServers 10 #MaxSpareServers 25 ServerLimit 250 MaxRequestWorkers 250 MaxConnectionsPerChild 1000 KeepAlive On KeepAliveTimeout 30 EnableSendfile Off So I was just wondering how this change could've cause this problem of having the number of apache processes spike. And if there are any other changes we can make to apache to bring the process count down? Also I realize that installing apache / php from source isn't standard practice on red hat variants. But at the time that these se...

...hics vnc,port=5906 --noautoconsole Starting install... ERROR unsupported configuration: guest and host CPU are not compatible: Host CPU does not provide required features: invpcid, erms, bmi2, smep, avx2, bmi1, fsgsbase, movbe, fma Domain installation does not appear to have been successful. I could not resolve this error . Finally i came across the post which say that libvirt cross verifies flags under CPU model present in /usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map.xml and cat /proc/cpuinfo . An yes the flag complained were not present in host proc/cpuinfo. Question 1: Is it really needed for Libvirt to...

...s sites. >> > The problem is that only the owner (or a member of dnsadmins) of a dns > record can update it. You seem to be trying to use a computer account > (fairly common) that doesn't own the records. > > Rowland Actually it looks as if Bind isn't running. Though I could've sworn it did at one point. service bind9 restart  * Stopping domain name service... bind9               rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused [ OK ]  * Starting domain name service... bind9 [fail] Log shows; Jan  2 15:20:51 ddc2 named[2793]: ------------------------...

...a server to a client machine ( either mac or windows ) my samba server crashes paralyzing my server machine and forcing me to reboot it. Once the behavior occurs I can no longer ssh into the server or if I happen to be in it already I can't even stop and restart samba. Is this a known issue? Could something be getting out of sync? I don't believe this is client issue as I can duplicate with both mac and windows clients easily. Any ideas resolving this issue would be great. Thanks ..Chris

On 2/28/16, Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote: > The fact is, undefined compiler behavior is never a good idea. Not for > serious projects. Actually, undefined behavior is essential for serious projects, but not for the reasons mentioned. If the language has no undefined behavior, then from the compiler's view, there is no such thing as a bad program. All

...o the same function would have the same location and thus be the same scope - so we'd only have one DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine, instead of two. Clang worked around this for a while by putting column info on call sites to help give them unique call sites, but this was insufficient (the two calls could've come from within a macro, in which case they'd be attributed to the same line/column again). - David Thanks, --paulr _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.e...