search for: would've

...list. > >is there anything I can do? > > Sorry about this, Patrick! I believe that some reverse-DNS > improvements are needed. Discussion about it is happening. - Shao I think this is not the case the problem was solved and the postings were arriving normally; off course if this would've been just a miss configurationsure I wouldn't got the missed postings but miraculously I did; then I really do not know what's really going on here. Besides that now I'm being "moderated", my posts are being rejected and edited version of them get to the list i.e[sysli...

...eading profile). > > Is there a reason why we must only have one location for every > instruction? If not, why not merge them and keep them all? > Not a requirement - of course we could keep them all with some kind of ordered list and even potentially include a "this is the one we would've picked" info (eg: the first one's the one we would pick today, if we would've picked one rather than none) so we could be backwards compatible if desired. That would be a lot of engineering work to plumb through LLVM the notion of multiple debug locations, I think. I'm not...

...I've searched high and low and can't find a nice yum repo with it and all of it's dependencies. Does anyone know if it lives in a yum repo anywhere? I'm getting lazy in my old age(just turned 30) and I just wanna "yum install" it rather than tracking it all down like I would've 10 years ago :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050513/54fda70a/attachment-0004.html>

...wrote: > Is there a reason why we must only have one location for every > instruction? If not, why not merge them and keep them all? > > > Not a requirement - of course we could keep them all with some kind of > ordered list and even potentially include a "this is the one we would've > picked" info (eg: the first one's the one we would pick today, if we > would've picked one rather than none) so we could be backwards compatible > if desired. > > That would be a lot of engineering work to plumb through LLVM the notion > of multiple debug loc...

...is terminated. Then I thought - what if sshd had builtins like bash, so that i could send a "reboot" command to the ssh daemon instead "ssh system /sbin/reboot" andd sshd could tell PID 1 to reboot. There are, of course, a lot things to think about here, but I really think this would be a good thing to think about implementing. It sure would've helped me now. -- Mvh, Lars Bahner

Hi Rick, you are right! But can you call this method EngineBuilder::setErrorStr to get creation error? Cheers, Manuele Il 08/01/2013 20:27, Rick Mann ha scritto: > On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:09 , Manuele Conti <manuele.conti at sirius-es.it> wrote: > >> Sorry I forgot to add code that I use to run code: >> /* Executes the AST by running the main function */ >>

Hey Tim, thanks for the quick answer, this looks exactly like what I was trying to achieve, I was hoping there was something more clean, I was wondering how the community would accept a change in the TD, if the code at CallinvConvLower.cpp:138 would've passed the IsFixed flag to the AssignFn then all those workarounds wouldn't be needed, this example is only one of a few I can think of for expanding the CallingConvention tablegen capabilities regarding this issue....

Hi! I was tying out the put command with version 6.7_p1 of OpenSSH. If I use recursive copying, sftp expects the last directory in the <source> exists in the destination (on the server), otherwise ?Couldn't canonicalize: No such file or directory?. I would've taken this to be the expected behavior, but get command does not have this problem. It makes the destination directory in the client like with cp. So kindly take a look at this.

...r 64 or 128 bits. Is the same true of structs? > It'd be nice to move some > of that logic back into LLVM, but it's tricky because C99 says things > about complex numbers which requires special frontend type knowledge > that LLVM doesn't have. I hadn't realized that, I would've expected complex numbers to be doable as just a pair of scalar values. What's the fly in the ointment with C99 complex numbers? > I'm just echoing previous discussion, and you can probably get a more > reliable answer by finding the original discussion in the archives. I don&...

I recently acquired a Fujitsu Lifebook 1610. Unfortunately, the machine was missing a lot of the stuff that would've come with it brand new, mainly the usb cdrom drive. Currently, I'm running Fedora on it, and I installed it using a usb flash drive with the help of a program called unetbootin(Probably not spelled right). to load the ISO onto the USB drive. I've successfully used the same prog...

...tion tools (don't ask, don't tell...). This seems to be one area that R is incredibly weak in (well, nearly all stat packages, except perhaps specialized tools and SAS); sure, there are a number of functions in various packages: base, statmod, Hmisc Have I missed something? (I would've expected at least one sequential computation, or non-standard design, but apparently there are none, or I missed it). I'd appreciate hearing about work that I've missed... best, -tony -- rossini at u.washington.edu http://www.analytics.washington.edu/ Biomedical and...

...igured as follows using its BIOS tools: SATA-0 is a 160 GiB drive used as boot SATA-1 and SATA-2 are both 500 GiB drives and were configured as a RAID-1 in BIOS. When the system boots up, BIOS reports 1 160 GiB SATA drive, and 1 Logical volume as RAID-1 ID#0 500 GiB, which is what I would expect it to report, as the two drives are now raided together. However, when I boot into the Centos installer and I get to configuring the partitions, it lists both sda, sdb, and sdc as available. Both sdb and sdc are 500 GiB. I would've expected to only see one drive for the RAID s...

...' after playing with it a bit. It seemed to uninstall a lot of GNOME stuff (presumably that they had in common) and so the next time I tried to use GNOME it looked different and was missing a few components. Should I have just reverted the install of Xfce to undo it so that those dependencies would've have been touched or is this just how yum works?

...edCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will > need more love and care. > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting > AnnotatedCommand. > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot master. IMO that is the Right...

...ecutionEngine/JIT.h' if you want that engine) from your main file. Including that file forces the JIT static constructor to be linked into your executable. Without it, the JIT static constructor gets optimized out and you get the result you're seeing. Wow, how obscure! Thank you; I never would've figured that out. Why is it done that way? That seems…quite horrible, actually. Why not just instantiate the JIT on demand as part of instantiating the Engine? Thanks again. It works now. Thank you. Thank you. -- Rick

...). During installation I picked the correct timezone, location and all. Yet, upon booting the machine, it seems to think that it's 6 hours earlier than it really is. The BIOS has the correct time and date on it. /etc/locatime was originally what /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/Denver would've been. I removed it and symlinked it instead thinking it might change things - it didn't. Right now, 'date' tells me: [1] 13:21:12 <root at bigbertha:~> date Sat Apr 14 13:21:13 MDT 2007 But it's actually 19:21... So, uh, what's goin...

Hello again, I am simply trying to import a rectangular table of strings. The table's dimensions are 1990 x 2, yet my read.table() command can only find 362 of the rows (and they're not the first 362). I would've taken the time to figure out how to use scan, readLines, or some other tool that can read in character strings, and then parse and input to a table, but that seems like overkill, and probably it would be good to understand what's wrong with my text file. The file is here. https://regtra...

...OEF", "INF_ACTIVITY", "ZERO_ACTIVITY" )) yy <- params[4] + (params[3] - params[4])/(1 + 10^(params[1]-xx)^params[2]) t1 <- 10^(params[1]-xx) t2 <- params[3] - params[4] t3 <- (1+t1)^params[2] t4 <- t2/t3; t5 <- params[4] + t4 I would've expected yy and t5 to be the same; yet they are not -- Rajarshi Guha | http://blog.rguha.net NIH Center for Advancing Translational Science

...inner loop, the computed SCEV is  %j.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %for.body ], [ %add8, %for.inc ]   -->  {0,+,(1 + %0)}<nsw><%for.cond1> where %0 here is a LoadInst for "incr". In this situation, the analysis is working as expected to compute the add-recurrence for "j". I would've expected a similar computation for the first case too, something like {0,+,%0}<nsw><%for.cond1> Where %0 would be the LoadInst for "incr".  Is this a bug or is there something more involved that causes the deficiency? Thanks,- Vaivaswatha -------------- next part -----...

Hi, I'm trying to annotate the final assembly output of my llvm codegen with the corresponding input C statements. It would've been super easy if the source information were included in the IR debug info. But obviously they are not, and there are good reasons why not ! So I'm bound to collecting all my information in the back-end from the existing debug pseudo instructions. As you know, the debug instructions on...