search for: cosanostra

...44 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> I think we need to >> continue to use the name 'LLVM' to refer to the IR (i.e. that >> which is >> described in http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html), On the wackier side of "things that don't mean what they seem": CosaNostra ("our thing"). All seriousness aside, I liked Illiacc (+1 for that one from me.) I'd also thought "Blastula" might also be descriptive of the current and future developing state of llvm. -scooter

On Apr 11, 2007, at 9:44 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > I think we need to > continue to use the name 'LLVM' to refer to the IR (i.e. that which is > described in http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html), Makes sense. > and we should plan to > attach LLVM as a suffix to the project name for several years to > come: For > example: "Use the Foo/LLVM Compiler System, it

...t;> >>> I think we need to >>> continue to use the name 'LLVM' to refer to the IR (i.e. that >>> which is >>> described in http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html), > > On the wackier side of "things that don't mean what they seem": > CosaNostra ("our thing"). > > All seriousness aside, I liked Illiacc (+1 for that one from me.) I'd I'm going to vote for illiacc too. It's just too good. > also thought "Blastula" might also be descriptive of the current and > future developing state of llvm. &g...

Hi Everyone, LLVM is a growing project, and many of us are very fond of it. :) LLVM is continuing to grow, both in maturity in specific areas and in scope of areas that it is applicable to. When we first started the project, we focused on the design of the intermediate representation. It is a strong design goal that the IR be a self-contained virtual instruction set, which fully describes