> On Apr 11, 2007, at 9:44 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> I think we need to >> continue to use the name 'LLVM' to refer to the IR (i.e. that >> which is >> described in http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html),On the wackier side of "things that don't mean what they seem": CosaNostra ("our thing"). All seriousness aside, I liked Illiacc (+1 for that one from me.) I'd also thought "Blastula" might also be descriptive of the current and future developing state of llvm. -scooter
On Apr 13, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Scott Michel wrote:>> On Apr 11, 2007, at 9:44 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >>> I think we need to >>> continue to use the name 'LLVM' to refer to the IR (i.e. that >>> which is >>> described in http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html), > > On the wackier side of "things that don't mean what they seem": > CosaNostra ("our thing"). > > All seriousness aside, I liked Illiacc (+1 for that one from me.) I'dI'm going to vote for illiacc too. It's just too good.> also thought "Blastula" might also be descriptive of the current and > future developing state of llvm. > > > -scooter > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
On Apr 14, 2007, at 12:13 AM, Patrick Meredith wrote:>> >> All seriousness aside, I liked Illiacc (+1 for that one from me.) I'd > > I'm going to vote for illiacc too. It's just too good.Much as I like Illiacc too, I don't think we can use it. ILLIAC is the name of a series of well-known supercomputers built at UIUC, and (after a gap of some years), we now have two more of the series -- ILLIAC 6 and Trusted ILLIAC. Calling our software Illiacc would be far too confusing for many people. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/