search for: corrups

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4263 Summary: Symlinks gets corruped when rsyncd is used to 'put' the symlink. Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

NEW message w/ URL to zip archive containing debug output. Hi I'm having huge problems with OpenSSH 3.0.1p1, compiled with OpenSSL 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001 and running with prngd_0.9.23, it disconnects unexpectedly during client session due to bad packet length and corruped MAC on input, according to debug anyway. What can cause this kinds of errors? I've verified that both se9104/server and

Hi, I am working on Centos6.6 on a VirtualBox on Windows Host. Today I started to have booting issues in the OS. It won't get past the loading screen. I checked and found that the files related to the user "cloudera" on the system were not accessible. Only the files related to root were accessible. This is why I was am not able to do a single user login but an emergency login was

I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on http://www.vmxray.com/. I could see that despite my disk being of 100GB only ~65GB was being shown. All the stuff related ot the local user was not visible at all. After I restarted my VM, the OS gets stuck here ( http://i.stack.imgur.com/KVYxV.png). Even after trying the single user login it was stuck there. But the emergency mode worked alright.

On 05/02/17 21:49, H wrote: > On 05/02/2017 08:01 AM, mark wrote: >> On 05/02/17 06:56, Steven Tardy wrote: >>> >>>> On May 1, 2017, at 8:49 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> the computer locks up at random intervals >>> >>> Anything in /var/log/mcelog? >>> Is the "edac" module running?

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 06:47 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on http://www.vmxray.com/ >> . >> I could see that despite my disk being of 100GB only ~65GB was being >> shown. >> All the stuff related ot the local user was not visible at

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 06:47 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on >>>>

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:51 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com>

Hi all, I am using an USB memory stick as cache and log devices for a HDD ZFS pool named tank0: $ zpool status -v tank0 pool: tank0 state: ONLINE scan: scrub repaired 0 in 7h19m with 0 errors on Tue Jul 30 06:11:23 2013 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada0s1d ONLINE 0 0 0 logs gpt/SLOG

On 06/14/2015 06:28 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > Hi, > I am working on Centos6.6 on a VirtualBox on Windows Host. Today I started > to have booting issues in the OS. It won't get past the loading screen. I > checked and found that the files related to the user "cloudera" on the > system were not accessible. Only the files related to root were accessible. > This is

On 06/14/2015 06:47 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on http://www.vmxray.com/. > I could see that despite my disk being of 100GB only ~65GB was being shown. > All the stuff related ot the local user was not visible at all. > After I restarted my VM, the OS gets stuck here ( > http://i.stack.imgur.com/KVYxV.png). Even after trying the

On 05/03/2017 07:47 AM, mark wrote: > On 05/02/17 21:49, H wrote: >> On 05/02/2017 08:01 AM, mark wrote: >>> On 05/02/17 06:56, Steven Tardy wrote: >>>> >>>>> On May 1, 2017, at 8:49 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> the computer locks up at random intervals >>>> >>>> Anything

Hello list, Is there a possibility to add entries to the winbindd_idmap.tdb manually? I know I can use tdbdump to see the entries, but is there a chance to modify? My problem is I have to map some uid to some Windows SID without using LDAP. On the other hand new user not having any uid in linux should map to the range of uid I defind by using idmap uid = 10000-20000 2nd Question: Is it

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:33 AM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 10:27 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:51 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com>

Hi, My swap is on raidz1. Df -k and swap -l are showing almost no usage of swap, while zfs list and zpool list are showing me 96% capacity. Which should i believe? Justin # df -hk Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on /dev/dsk/c3t0d0s1 14G 4.0G 10G 28% / /devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices ctfs

On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 06/14/2015 06:47 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >> >>> I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on http://www.vmxray.com/ >>> . >>> I could see that despite my disk being of 100GB only ~65GB was being >>>

Hi list, I''ve did some tests and run into a very strange situation.. I created a zvol using "zfs create -V" and initialize an sam-filesystem on this zvol. After that I restored some testdata using a dump from another system. So far so good. After some big troubles I found out that releasing files in the sam-filesystem doesn''t create space on the underlying zvol.

On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 06/14/2015 06:47 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>>>

On 06/14/2015 10:27 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:51 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>>>

Hi, I''ve been writing a login application to utilize the features of both PAM and libpwdb. Not surprisingly, this has meant looking at some old code.. The following denial of service attack seems to work quite nicely on my ancient Red Hat 3.0.3 system with the standard login application. Perhaps this is not a problem with 4.0? Does anyone know about other distributions? joe$ nvi