search for: copyrighted

Hi: After compiling rsync2.5.6 using on SVR4 on Intel HW, Please help # ./rsync --version rsync: --version: unknown option rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.c(994) # ./rsync --help Segmentation Fault - core dumped Here is log of compilation. Script started on Sat Jun 21 05:56:15 2003 # make cc -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c rsync.c -o rsync.o NCR High

..., poems, paintings and more. The law covers the form of expression, not the concept, facts or the actual idea of the work. This means that someone can use another person?s idea or concept and produce their own take on it. However, copying another person?s work is a violation. some things may not be copyrighted but they may be protected by a patent or trademark. Individuals who have a copyright on a particular piece of work can do with it what they will. They may choose to copy it and sell it. They may display their work or perform it in public and charge admission, or they can assign or sell the work t...

My company recently started using a R library from RCRAN that is licensed under the LGPL Version 2 or greater per the DESCRIPTION file, but contains no copy of the LGPL notice, or any copyright notice. I've grown accustomed to paying attention to copyright and licensing as a Debian package maintainer, and sent the author of the package an email expressing my concern. The author believed that

Hi all, Some history. Samba has historically only accepted code with personal, not corporate copyright attached. There were a couple of good reasons for this in the past, one of which was that we preferred GPL enforcement decisions to be made by individuals, not by corporations. Under GPLv2, a license violator loses all rights under the license and these have to be reinstated by the copyright

Source: xen Version: 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3, 4.5, 12.5 X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmaster at debian.org Dear maintainer, Copyright 2022-present Keir Fraser and/or many others" is not a valid copyright claim. Copyright is always time-limited, so it simply does not make sense to say "-present". Also, our copyright format is already implicitly

Hi All, I updated the copyright section of the developer policy: http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#copyright This change doesn't affect any llvm policies, it just makes the developer policy reflect reality. The previous version (archived here: http://llvm.org/releases/2.7/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#copyright) used to claim that all copyright was assigned to the university of

At the top of src/nmath/qnorm.c it is stated: * Copyright (C) 1998 Ross Ihaka * Copyright (C) 2000--2005 The R Development Core Team * based on AS 111 (C) 1977 Royal Statistical Society * and on AS 241 (C) 1988 Royal Statistical Society The routine is in fact an f2c'd version of AS241 from StatLib: http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/apstat/241 and http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/apstat/ It

Dear all, This is a little bit off-topic, but I was wondering if anyone has any informed opinion on whether data (ie. a dataset) is copyrightable? Hadley

Hi, I installed Samba on Solaris to enable me print from the solaris workstation to a windows print server. When I start smbd and nmbd , smbd does not run but nmbd runs

E820 definitions copied from IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Csm/ LegacyBiosDxe/LegacyBiosInterface.h. Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com> --- OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/E820.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) create mode

The path to bash on FreeBSD is /usr/local/bin/bash. --- docs/make-links.sh | 2 +- nbdkit.in | 2 +- tests/make-pki.sh | 2 +- tests/make-psk.sh | 2 +- tests/test-blocksize.sh | 2 +- tests/test-cache.sh | 2 +- tests/test-captive.sh | 2 +- tests/test-cow.sh | 2 +-

Dear R Developers, Recently filed (and dismissed ;) ) law suit by Astrolabe against tz database developers caused a lot of media-press and discussions and created some kind of precedence in the USA [3]. But also it imho showed that similar attacks might happen in the future, and possibly against data sets which are not that obviously "factual" thus after all might fall under copyright

Sorry for the off-topic post, but I guess someone else may hit the same issue.... Having developed a rails application, I now need to put GPL text and a copyright notice at the start of each source file. For the .rb files, this will look like: # Copyright 2006 Robert Jones........... and for the .rhtml files it will look like: <!-- Copyright 2006 Robert Jones......... Can anyone think of

I have been packaging both R and the R contributed libraries for the Debian GNU/Linux operating system. Right now if anyone installs Debian Linux on an Intel machine or a DEC Alpha they will have the option of installing R as a regular part of the operating system. I think this is a good way of getting wider distribution of high quality statistical software. The Linux community is growing

I will be taking over as maintainer of the its package from Giles Heywood. The code was originally written while he was working at Commerzbank. I have added the header below to the top of the R source file to indicate the changes in the copyrights for the code. The package was originally released under GPL2. I have no experience with copyright issues, and would appreciate it if someone who does

Okay, I think this somewhat of a windows error and has nothing to do with wine errors but I am having trouble setting permissions in the registry using wine. I am trying to install dotnet30 however it gets a windows error and asks if I want to send report or not. I found this thread http://geekswithblogs.net/TimH/archive/2006/11/17/97385.aspx So I went into the registry found the file and

...urposes". There is a possibility I will have to remove this one as well but I don't think so. All the code here was written by Fritz Leisch and is covered by the GPL. All the rest of the library is data sets that were converted by Fritz. I believe that data themselves cannot be copyrighted - only a particular representation of the data such as a table can be copyrighted. In this case, since Fritz converted the data to a format to be read into R, the representation is covered by Fritz putting it under the GPL. I would appreciate hearing from anyone who feels I am misinterp...

I thought about committing this change to all .c files: Removed all Copyright Timo Sirainen comments. They weren't always correct and the year numbers were rarely updated when something was changed. Copyright is owned by the creator by default in practically all countries, there's no need to advertise it everywhere. Can anyone think of reasons why this wouldn't be a good idea?

...liberal license, it''s not a huge deal. I mean, it would be pretty hard for someone to use it in a way that''s not allowed. So it''s unlikely that we would actually want to sue someone for misuse of the code. But it seems like there is still value in having all the code copyrighted by one person (or legal entity), in case a license change or clarification needs to be made later. Assuming there are no objections, I will continue to be the copyright holder for all the wxruby2 files. That means that anyone who submits a patch or other code is assigning me the copyrights to t...

This updates one rather important mention of the copyright year (the encoding/decoding progress display) and a few in the documentation. Furthermore, it updates the open bug list --- doc/html/documentation_bugs.html | 7 ------- doc/html/faq.html | 4 ++-- doc/html/id.html | 4 ++-- src/flac/main.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12