search for: copyrightable

Hi: After compiling rsync2.5.6 using on SVR4 on Intel HW, Please help # ./rsync --version rsync: --version: unknown option rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.c(994) # ./rsync --help Segmentation Fault - core dumped Here is log of compilation. Script started on Sat Jun 21 05:56:15 2003 # make cc -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c rsync.c -o rsync.o NCR High

The ticket clinic, What Is U.S. Copyright Law? The US Copyright Law grants rights to individuals for the works they create. The US Copyright Act of 1790 has changed over the years. The current basis of US copyright law is based on the Copyright Act of 1976. US copyright law is relatively automatic. Once someone has an idea and produces it in tangible form, the creator is the copyright holder and

My company recently started using a R library from RCRAN that is licensed under the LGPL Version 2 or greater per the DESCRIPTION file, but contains no copy of the LGPL notice, or any copyright notice. I've grown accustomed to paying attention to copyright and licensing as a Debian package maintainer, and sent the author of the package an email expressing my concern. The author believed that

Hi all, Some history. Samba has historically only accepted code with personal, not corporate copyright attached. There were a couple of good reasons for this in the past, one of which was that we preferred GPL enforcement decisions to be made by individuals, not by corporations. Under GPLv2, a license violator loses all rights under the license and these have to be reinstated by the copyright

Hi All, I updated the copyright section of the developer policy: http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#copyright This change doesn't affect any llvm policies, it just makes the developer policy reflect reality. The previous version (archived here: http://llvm.org/releases/2.7/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#copyright) used to claim that all copyright was assigned to the university of

At the top of src/nmath/qnorm.c it is stated: * Copyright (C) 1998 Ross Ihaka * Copyright (C) 2000--2005 The R Development Core Team * based on AS 111 (C) 1977 Royal Statistical Society * and on AS 241 (C) 1988 Royal Statistical Society The routine is in fact an f2c'd version of AS241 from StatLib: http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/apstat/241 and http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/apstat/ It

Dear all, This is a little bit off-topic, but I was wondering if anyone has any informed opinion on whether data (ie. a dataset) is copyrightable? Hadley

Hi, I installed Samba on Solaris to enable me print from the solaris workstation to a windows print server. When I start smbd and nmbd , smbd does not run but nmbd runs

E820 definitions copied from IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Csm/ LegacyBiosDxe/LegacyBiosInterface.h. Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com> --- OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/E820.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) create mode

The path to bash on FreeBSD is /usr/local/bin/bash. --- docs/make-links.sh | 2 +- nbdkit.in | 2 +- tests/make-pki.sh | 2 +- tests/make-psk.sh | 2 +- tests/test-blocksize.sh | 2 +- tests/test-cache.sh | 2 +- tests/test-captive.sh | 2 +- tests/test-cow.sh | 2 +-

...data copyright/license' question comes over and over again, I just wanted to ask based on what policies or advisories datasets were selected to be shipped with R. From a very very brief look at the datasets, many of them appear to be factual data, thus at least at the moment probably are not copyrightable in the states -- but is there guarantee that they are not protected by copyright elsewhere if their origin abroad? But some seems to come from published works (still) under copyright with "All rights reserved", e.g. datasets Harman23 and Harman74 [4]. Although similar question to mine...

Sorry for the off-topic post, but I guess someone else may hit the same issue.... Having developed a rails application, I now need to put GPL text and a copyright notice at the start of each source file. For the .rb files, this will look like: # Copyright 2006 Robert Jones........... and for the .rhtml files it will look like: <!-- Copyright 2006 Robert Jones......... Can anyone think of

I have been packaging both R and the R contributed libraries for the Debian GNU/Linux operating system. Right now if anyone installs Debian Linux on an Intel machine or a DEC Alpha they will have the option of installing R as a regular part of the operating system. I think this is a good way of getting wider distribution of high quality statistical software. The Linux community is growing

I will be taking over as maintainer of the its package from Giles Heywood. The code was originally written while he was working at Commerzbank. I have added the header below to the top of the R source file to indicate the changes in the copyrights for the code. The package was originally released under GPL2. I have no experience with copyright issues, and would appreciate it if someone who does

Okay, I think this somewhat of a windows error and has nothing to do with wine errors but I am having trouble setting permissions in the registry using wine. I am trying to install dotnet30 however it gets a windows error and asks if I want to send report or not. I found this thread http://geekswithblogs.net/TimH/archive/2006/11/17/97385.aspx So I went into the registry found the file and

Sorry to bring up this old topic again but ... The 2.0 release of Debian Linux is about to happen and the release team requires copyright statements on any code included in the release. Presently there are 4 packages that I have created from R source code and libraries and contributed to the release. I think this will help with the visibility of R when there is a well-regarded release of an

I thought about committing this change to all .c files: Removed all Copyright Timo Sirainen comments. They weren't always correct and the year numbers were rarely updated when something was changed. Copyright is owned by the creator by default in practically all countries, there's no need to advertise it everywhere. Can anyone think of reasons why this wouldn't be a good idea?

Greetings all, Recently I noticed that although the wxruby2 LICENSE file contains a simple MIT-style license, the actual source files (mostly .i and .rb) still referred to the older "wxWidgets license". I have updated all the source files to be consistent with the intended LICENSE. Another issue is the copyright. Almost all the files (still) had my name as the copyright holder.

This updates one rather important mention of the copyright year (the encoding/decoding progress display) and a few in the documentation. Furthermore, it updates the open bug list --- doc/html/documentation_bugs.html | 7 ------- doc/html/faq.html | 4 ++-- doc/html/id.html | 4 ++-- src/flac/main.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12

Hi folks, I tried to use WinSCP (http://winscp.vse.cz/eng/) for a ftp like scp-GUI for Windows in order to connect to a HP-UX machine running 11.0 and openssh-2.5.1p2. The problem is that I can connect to any user I want _except_ root! When I connect to root, then the command "echo $status" (this is the way how WinSCP detects the user shell) results in a "logout root". The