search for: conversli

Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before calling Transmit if the source port have already been decided. Conversly, we have to save the assigned port to reuse it later if needed. Resolve bug #35. Signed-off-by: Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> --- efi/udp.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >> Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new >> source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before >> calling Transmit if the source port have already been decided.

Hello, I'm attempting to read information from an XML into a data frame in R using the "XML" package. I am unable to get the data into a data frame as I would like. I have some sample code below. *XML Code:* Header... Data I want in a data frame: <data> <row BRAND="GMC" NUM="1" YEAR="1999" VALUE="10000" /> <row

Hello, I'm attempting to read information from an XML into a data frame in R using the "XML" package. I am unable to get the data into a data frame as I would like. I have some sample code below. *XML Code:* Header... Data I want in a data frame: <data> <row BRAND="GMC" NUM="1" YEAR="1999" VALUE="10000" /> <row

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/11/29, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com>: >> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a

Hi, what is the status of chan_cornet? Does someone here use it in production? I can't find enough info about it. Some URLs will be great. Thank you, -David

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: > Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new > source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before > calling Transmit if the source port have already been decided. > Conversly, we have to save the assigned port to reuse it later if > needed. > > Resolve

2013/11/29, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com>: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new >>> source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before

hello we got a serious problem with samba 223 and winbind i didn't find alot about on the net so I thought it could be interesting to tell you we have a file server w/ mandrake 8.0, a custom kernel 2.4.18 with quotas, acls, and a custom samba 2.2.3 with quotas, acl, and winbind. samba forwards auth to an NT PDC. FS rights are given on domain user names. there are quite a lot users, ca 2000.

***Scroll down to see the dumb quick question*** I have two Models: class Template < ActiveRecord::Base end which has this migration: /snip t.column :name, :string And the other model: class Product < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :template end with the migration: /snip t.column :qty, :integer, :default => 0 t.column :specialDescription, :string t.column

Hi Mark/Joel, This is the v2 of bug fix for ocfs2_add_branch. Modification from V1 to V2: 1. Create a patch which return EROFS instead of BUG in ocfs2_insert_at_leaf. 2. Use ocfs2_adjust_rightmost_records to change the root and extent blocks in the rightmost path. Regards, Tao

In ocfs2_add_branch, we use the rightmost rec of the leaf extent block to generate the e_cpos for the new added branch. In the most case, it is OK but if there is a gap between the the root(or branch) 's rightmost rec and the leaf, it will cause kernel panic if we insert some clusters in it. The message is something like: (7445,1):ocfs2_insert_at_leaf:3775 ERROR: bug expression: