search for: conversly

Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before calling Transmit if the source port have already been decided. Conversly, we have to save the assigned port to reuse it later if needed. Resolve bug #35. Signed-off-by: Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> --- efi/udp.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/efi/udp.c b/efi/udp.c index 59bb426..7271f1f 100644 --- a/efi/udp.c +++ b/e...

...013 at 9:34 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >> Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new >> source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before >> calling Transmit if the source port have already been decided. >> Conversly, we have to save the assigned port to reuse it later if >> needed. >> >> Resolve bug #35. >> >> Signed-off-by: Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> >> --- >> efi/udp.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) >> >> d...

...al entries to actually create the data frame. The data frame I would like is as follows: BRAND NUM YEAR VALUE GMC 1 1999 10000 FORD 2 2000 12000 GMC 1 2001 12500 etc........ Any help or suggestions would be appreciated. Conversly, my eventual goal would be to take a data frame and write it into an XML in the previously shown format. Thank you AG [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...al entries to actually create the data frame. The data frame I would like is as follows: BRAND NUM YEAR VALUE GMC 1 1999 10000 FORD 2 2000 12000 GMC 1 2001 12500 etc........ Any help or suggestions would be appreciated. Conversly, my eventual goal would be to take a data frame and write it into an XML in the previously shown format. Thank you AG [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...elibi at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new >>>> source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before >>>> calling Transmit if the source port have already been decided. >>>> Conversly, we have to save the assigned port to reuse it later if >>>> needed. >>>> >>>> Resolve bug #35. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> efi/udp.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >&g...

Hi, what is the status of chan_cornet? Does someone here use it in production? I can't find enough info about it. Some URLs will be great. Thank you, -David

...n Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: > Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new > source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before > calling Transmit if the source port have already been decided. > Conversly, we have to save the assigned port to reuse it later if > needed. > > Resolve bug #35. > > Signed-off-by: Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> > --- > efi/udp.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/efi/udp.c b/efi/udp.c > i...

...Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new >>> source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before >>> calling Transmit if the source port have already been decided. >>> Conversly, we have to save the assigned port to reuse it later if >>> needed. >>> >>> Resolve bug #35. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> >>> --- >>> efi/udp.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 18 i...

...red var/locks and restarted it then we gave manually (well, with a set of scripts, actually) all the rights to all the files. hopefully each user could write in his own dir only, and we could associate the name of the dir and the name of the user. we were indeed very lucky from this point of view. conversly, I hope this will be enough to solve the problem, or else it would mean that we could get the same problem on the other server (which was launched with 2.2.7) I'd appreciate a lot any info, either confirming this is a bug or explaining what kind of situation could have make this happen. tia...

***Scroll down to see the dumb quick question*** I have two Models: class Template < ActiveRecord::Base end which has this migration: /snip t.column :name, :string And the other model: class Product < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :template end with the migration: /snip t.column :qty, :integer, :default => 0 t.column :specialDescription, :string t.column

Hi Mark/Joel, This is the v2 of bug fix for ocfs2_add_branch. Modification from V1 to V2: 1. Create a patch which return EROFS instead of BUG in ocfs2_insert_at_leaf. 2. Use ocfs2_adjust_rightmost_records to change the root and extent blocks in the rightmost path. Regards, Tao

...atic int ocfs2_add_branch(struct ocfs2_super *osb, goto bail; } - eb = (struct ocfs2_extent_block *)(*last_eb_bh)->b_data; - new_cpos = ocfs2_sum_rightmost_rec(&eb->h_list); - /* Note: new_eb_bhs[new_blocks - 1] is the guy which will be * linked with the rest of the tree. * conversly, new_eb_bhs[0] is the new bottommost leaf. -- 1.6.2.rc2.16.gf474c