search for: contracts

Hi everyone, I am relatively new to rspec and I am running into a wall in testing my views. I have a RESTful resource Contracts with a nested resource of Line_items. I am trying to figure out how to test the "edit" form of the Line_items. What complicates this is the nested routing and how to account for it, and that there is a partial form (_form.haml) that both the edit.haml and new.haml views use (app/views/li...

...t. SMF isn't doing the right thing WRT sshd. For example, SMF should be able to restart sshd if it's killed, but it's not currently doing so and reports the service as being online. I tracked down the problem to the fact that OpenSSH does not put child processes into separate process contracts. There are two side-effects to this omission. The first is the problem I describe above. Because sshd does not put child processes into searate process contracts, every process in the tree rooted at the parent sshd is in the same process contract (assuming no other process is creating new proces...

...oration. > > I don't see a solution given the situation where -fp-contract=fast and we > want to contract. Furthermore, I think a 'nocontract' flag will allow the > IR to be more readable in it's intention. The problem is you can have 2 fp > arith instructions with no contracts and no reassoc with global fast math > flag set, how can you differentiate between the two instructions when you > want one to be contract and the other to be no contract? > > -Ryan > > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:27 PM Michael Berg <michael_c_berg at apple.com> >...

...by the NoContraction Decoration. I don't see a solution given the situation where -fp-contract=fast and we want to contract. Furthermore, I think a 'nocontract' flag will allow the IR to be more readable in it's intention. The problem is you can have 2 fp arith instructions with no contracts and no reassoc with global fast math flag set, how can you differentiate between the two instructions when you want one to be contract and the other to be no contract? -Ryan On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:27 PM Michael Berg <michael_c_berg at apple.com> wrote: > Ryan: > > I think thi...

...e a solution given the situation where -fp-contract=fast >>> and we want to contract. Furthermore, I think a 'nocontract' flag >>> will allow the IR to be more readable in it's intention. The >>> problem is you can have 2 fp arith instructions with no contracts >>> and no reassoc with global fast math flag set, how can you >>> differentiate between the two instructions when you want one to be >>> contract and the other to be no contract? >>> >>> -Ryan >>> >>> >>> >&...

On 22.08.2018 13:29, Ryan Taylor wrote: > The example starts as SPIR-V with the NoContraction decoration flag on > the fmul. > > I think what you are saying seems valid in that if the user had put the > flag on the fadd instead of the fmul it would not contract and so in > this example the user needs to put the NoContraction on the fadd though > I'm not sure

Maybe there is a cleaner solution but it seems like adding a 'nocontract' flag is close to the intention of spir-v and is an easy check in the DAGCombiner without breaking anything else and its intentions are very clear. Right now the DAGCombiner logic doesn't seem to be able to handle the case of having fast math globally with instruction level flags to turn off fast math. Right now,

On 14 October 2016 at 15:50, Sebastian Pop <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > These 3 tests are passing with the following configurations: > -O3 -ffp-contract=off > -O3 -ffp-contract=on > -O0 -ffp-contract=off > -O0 -ffp-contract=on > > They are not passing at: > -Ofast -ffp-contract=on > -Ofast -ffp-contract=off Let's separate completely FP-contract and

Hi, I would like your opinions on the contract we have between the LLVM IR and the backends. * Context * Right now, the backends are supposed to be able to perform instruction selection on any valid LLVM IR. Although this is *not* something I want to change for GlobalISel, I thought I brought that up on the mailing list to discuss the implications. In particular, in the past, some people

...<option value="<%= union.id %>"> <%= union.name %> </option> <% end %> </select> </div> </p> <p> Contract: </p> <p> <div id="contract_id_container"> <select name="contracts" id="contracts"> <option value="">Select Contract</option> </select> </div> <p> Rate Group </p> <p> <div id="rate_group_id_container"> <select name="rate_group" id="rate_group">...

Apologies for cross-posting. We''ve been asked to do a job for a client who wants to embrace agile development methodologies. Hurrah! However, our standard contract was written for the 1980s. It is full of phrases like "agreed specification" and "change request procedure" and so on. I was wondering, how do other people get around this in contract forms with

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > I don't think that Clang/LLVM uses it by default on x86_64. If you're using -Ofast, however, that would explain it. I recommend looking at -O3 vs -O0 and make sure those are the same. -Ofast enables -ffast-math, which can legitimately cause differences. > The following tests pass at "-O3" and

the case: i have two classes: 1) class Contract < ActiveRecord::Base serialize :addons end 2) class Addon < ActiveRecord::Base end Now i do the following in contract_controller: def create @contract = Contract.new(params[:contract]) @contract.user_id = session[:user_id] @contract.customer_id = params[:customer_id] @contract.pending = 1 @contract.addons = Array.new end def update

...e honorable course of action and live to the terms of the contract we executed. Should they decide to continue to ignore us and our attorney's attemts to communicate we will take legal action in court. Sipura has a GREAT product, its sad to see that their management team is willing to breach contracts. To our customers that have pending orders. We have attempted to source inventory from another location and have not been able to do that. There for we will be issueing complete refunds for all SPA-2000 purchases. While we have been difficult to reach in November, I remain strong in the bel...

On 21.08.2018 16:08, Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev wrote: > So I have a test case where: > > %20 = fmul nnan arcp float %15, %19 > %21 = fadd reassoc nnan arcp contract float %20, -1.000000e+00 > > is being contracted in DAG to fmad. Is this correct since the fmul has > no reassoc or contract fast math flag? By having the reassoc and contract flags on fadd, the frontend is

Hello R experts, The following problem outstrips my current programming knowledge. I have a dataframe with two fields that looks like the following: ID Contract 01 1 01 1 02 2 02 3 02 1 03 2 03 2 03 2 03 1 03 1 03 1 etc... I would like to end up with a dataframe with one row per ID where the value in the contract field would be the

Hello R-experts, I am having difficulties with 3D plotting (i.e. the evolution of various forward curves through time). I have two comma seperated files both ordered by date (in the first column) one containing contracts (meaning forward delivery months from YEAR_ & Letter "F" ... January through letter "Z" ... December) and the other holding the closing price of the respective contract on the day also defined in the first column (see attachments). What I would like to do is plot a three d...

Folks, I've been asking around people about the state of FP contract, which seems to be "on" but it's not really behaving like it, at least not as I would expect: int foo(float a, float b, float c) { return a*b+c; } $ clang -target aarch64-linux-gnu -O2 -S fma.c -ffp-contract=on -o - (...) fmul s0, s0, s1 fadd s0, s0, s2 (...) $ clang -target aarch64-linux-gnu -O2 -S fma.c

Hi, I would like to provide a summary of the different proposals on how to fix the test-suite to make it succeed when specifying extra CFLAGS "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on". I would like to expose the issue and proposed ways to fix it to other potential reviewers that could provide extra feedback. We also need to decide which proposal (or combination of) to implement and

On Sep 10, 2016, at 3:33 AM, Steve Canon <scanon at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> Pretty much. In particular, imagine a user trying to debug an unexpected floating point result caused by conversion of a*b + c into fma(a, b, c). >> >> I think that’s unavoidable, because of the way the optimization levels work. Even fma contraction is on by default (something I’d