search for: conroes

Tried to migrate a few VMs from existing system to an older host that we threw in the rack to facilitate some server reshuffling. Migration complained about lack of capabilities (which I expected its an older server) but when I looked at what I should throw into the xml file I got a core2duo when it should have been at least Penryn or something (Xeon E5345) Of course the VMs work fine with

Alrighty. I'm having a hell of a time and I need help. I'll try to give as much information as possible. ---------- HARDWARE ---------- MB: Supermicro PDSBM-LN2+ Intel 946GZ ICH7R + Intel? 82573 Memory: Crucial 512Mb, 1Gb, 2Gb modules matched to above MB. Processors: Intel Celeron 420 Conroe-L, 1.6GHz 512KB 64-bit Intel Core 2 Duo E6320, 1.86Ghz 4Mb 64-bit Intel Pentium E2140

>From /xen-unstable.hg/xen/arch/x86/cpu/intel.c if ((c->x86 == 0xf && c->x86_model >= 0x03) || (c->x86 == 0x6 && c->x86_model >= 0x0e)) set_bit(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, c->x86_capability); if (cpuid_edx(0x80000007) & (1u<<8)) { set_bit(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, c->x86_capability); set_bit(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC,

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (3): ================================================= 1).time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://losvmm-bridge.sh.intel.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 You can reproduce it on SMP windows, it will not happen on UP Windows 2) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 05:03:21PM -0700, W Kern wrote: >Tried to migrate a few VMs from existing system to an older host that we >threw in the rack to facilitate some server reshuffling. > >Migration complained about lack of capabilities (which I expected its an >older server) but when I looked at what I should throw into the xml file >I got a core2duo when it should have been

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (4): ================================================= 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t work. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=840 2)time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=895 You

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Fixed issue ================================================= 1) save&restore hvm guest will cause dom0 crash http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=962 2) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 3) Build HVM PV driver failed

I am using a debian 9 guest, hosted on a ESXi platform with nested virtualisation enabled. On this debian 9 guest when I run libguesfs-test-tool, it fails with an error: "qemu-system-x86_64: /build/qemu-DqynNa/qemu-2.8+dfsg/target-i386/kvm.c:1805: kvm_put_msrs: Assertion `ret == cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs' failed." Instead when I use a wrapper script and hook it with the env

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 965/5000P chipset. Here is the test summary: Bug has been fixed: ========================== 1).VMX domains fail to reboot bug has been fixed. Issues: ========================== 1) VBD driver does not work well http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=831 2) Only one vCPU is found in SMP xenU guest OS

Hi,All We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Two platforms (PAE/32E) test all are based on SMP, It means that we boot up SMP guest OS in VMX. Here is the test summary: New issue (1) ================================================ 1) Fails to restore VMX guests http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=929 Issues List (3):

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Three platforms (32/PAE/32E) test all are based on SMP, It means that we boot up SMP guest OS in VMX. Here is the test summary: New issue ================================================ No new issue Issues List: ================================================ 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t

New issues (2) ================================================= 1) Data corrupted after copied into a 32bit win2k3 guest on 64bit hypervisor with rtl8139 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1025 2) pcnet network of 32bit win2k/64bit hypervisor is not stable. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1026 Fixed issues (1)

Hi all, I successfully virt-p2v'ed a Windows 10 laptop to my Centos 7.3 instance running KVM. However, on boot, the guest hangs. Is there a registry fix that is needed after the P2V is done? Here is what is in the guest's logfile: 017-01-08 03:20:37.508+0000: starting up libvirt version: 2.0.0, package: 10.el7_3.2 (CentOS BuildSystem <http://bugs.centos.org>, 2016-12-06-19:53:38,

On May 10, 2010, at 9:07 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: > Hello. This is my 1st post. ようこそ！ > I have tried SSE execution domain fixup pass. > But I am not able to see any improvements. Did you actually measure runtime, or did you look at assembly? > I expect for the example below to use MOVDQA, PAND &c. > (On nehalem, ANDPS is extremely slower than PAND) Are you sure? The

On 03/03/2014 13:42, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:15:51AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >> On 03/03/2014 10:55, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: >>>> On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:

New issues (2) ================================================= 1) HVM guest can not boot up with qcow image. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 2) Disk I/O performance of IA32-pae HVM guest is very slow http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 3) xen0 hang or crash when destroy VMX guest if not enable "debug=y"

Hello all! I'm working on a library with bignum support, and I wanted to try LLVM as an apparently simpler and more portable system to my current design (a Haskell script which spits out mixed C and assembly). Porting the script to use the LLVM bindings instead of the current hack was pretty easy. But I have a few remaining questions: (1) Are bignums exposed to any higher-level

Hello. This is my 1st post. I have tried SSE execution domain fixup pass. But I am not able to see any improvements. I expect for the example below to use MOVDQA, PAND &c. (On nehalem, ANDPS is extremely slower than PAND) Please tell me if something would be wrong for me. Thank you. Takumi Host: i386-mingw32 Build: trunk at 103373 foo.ll: define <4 x i32> @foo(<4 x i32> %x,

Hi, VMWare has been a great tool for me to experiment with CentOS 3 and CentOS 4. However, I'm running into issues with CentOS 5. First, it is *extremely* slow to boot (as in it takes over an hour to boot CentOS 5 on a machine that boots CentOS 3 & 4 in less than one minute). Then, after an hour of slowly watching the messages go by on the console and the CPU of the host machine pegged

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 965/5000P chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: ========================= 1). VBD could not work well Partial support is added in c/s 13198, but the loader still complains that symbol "irq_to_evtchn_port" is missing. 2). IA32E: IA32E vista can''t boot up normally, it gives a blue screen. Then the qemu window