search for: conjur

...d by -asm-verbose. Is a new flag appropriate for this or should I just put it under -asm-verbose with everything else? If we want a new flag, does anyone have a spelling they'd recommend? I'm not particularly fond of -asm-pattern but it was the best concise name my uncreative brain could conjur up. -Dave

...mcd or llvmgen, witha > > preference for the latter. The more important thing is to makellvm > > code be the default output. > > I'm not thrilled with llvm-gen because it has overtones of "code > generation" (which actually isn't far from the truth). But, it conjures > up the wrong kind of tool .. something more like yacc or bison. However, > I don't have any good alternatives in mind. I'll ponder some more. How about llvm-comp? -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://nondot.org/sabre/

...Is a new flag appropriate for this or should I just put it under > -asm-verbose with everything else? If we want a new flag, does anyone > have a spelling they'd recommend? I'm not particularly fond of > -asm-pattern but it was the best concise name my uncreative brain could > conjur up. How do you plan to implement this? This is a compiler-hacker-only feature, can it be protected fully in !NDEBUG code? -Chris

...mmy picks up the call and hookflashes, then dials Jim's extension. Jim's phone rings for 20 seconds. But if he's not at his desk, the call then goes to *Tammy's* voicemail. I've gone through the WIKI and mail archives looking for the solution, but it's sort of hard to conjure the correct search string, I have found. Hopefully I've paid my newbie dues thereby, and someone more clueful might be willing to help. . . Thanks. I have CLI traces if that would be necessary for someone to see. B.

On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 01:17:24AM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > I'm not thrilled with llvm-gen because it has overtones of "code > > generation" (which actually isn't far from the truth). But, it > > conjures up the wrong kind of tool .. something more like yacc or > > bison. However, I don't have any good alternatives in mind. I'll > > ponder some more. > > How about llvm-comp? Sorry, that makes no sense to me, and I am a compiler developer. :) `comp' is too common as...

I've added an introduction article about the ARA on my web site http://www.voip-forum.com/ The same text is now also added to CVS head as README.realtime. On the same site, you will also find the news item about how we used Asterisk for a call from an airline jet above Greenland to Stockholm, Sweden. The world is getting smaller and more connected every day! /Olle

...s much churn as a. b is more > useful if we think other users of metadata may want/need similar > functionality in the future. I can't say I've followed all the details but would this be useful in moving toward support of .debug_types at all? There's a superficial resemblance in conjuring up hashes of types referenced from elsewhere, and I can't help wondering if the resemblance is any deeper than that. (I'm not insisting that it has to be, at worst it shouldn't get in the way if we can anticipate what would be required for .debug_types to work.) Thanks --paulr

Environment: Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu) DAV/2 SVN/1.4.6 PHP/5.2.4-2ubuntu5.1 with Suhosin-Patch mod_ruby/1.2.6 Ruby/1.8.6(2007-09-24) mod_ssl/2.2.8 OpenSSL/0.9.8g Phusion_Passenger/2.0.1 Server I''ve created several scaffolds that all work, and am trying to set the root page for this app to default to one of the methods. Here''s my routes.rb: ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do

...propriate for this or should I just put it under >> -asm-verbose with everything else? If we want a new flag, does anyone >> have a spelling they'd recommend? I'm not particularly fond of >> -asm-pattern but it was the best concise name my uncreative brain could >> conjur up. > > How do you plan to implement this? This is a compiler-hacker-only > feature, can it be protected fully in !NDEBUG code? The codegen portion certainly can be protected with !NDEBUG. The change has two parts: a TableGen enhancement to output a table of pattern strings and some cod...

My girlfriend and I have been dating for two years, and she just told me she has an STI... Actually, I currently have three different models, like: Dog, Whale, Monkey They all have some similar attributes, but, they are unique enough to break into their own models. I could use STI, but I think the table would just have too many columns. Now, I wanted to let the Dog''s, Whale''s

...be happy with either llvmcd or llvmgen, witha > preference for the latter. The more important thing is to makellvm > code be the default output. I'm not thrilled with llvm-gen because it has overtones of "code generation" (which actually isn't far from the truth). But, it conjures up the wrong kind of tool .. something more like yacc or bison. However, I don't have any good alternatives in mind. I'll ponder some more. Reid. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 by...

...tors), where >> any potential performance loss is acceptable for the sake of >> simplifying things. > > I don't understand this at all. > > We have a *target independent* backend. There is only one, so > there should be no recurring cost. So we have lots of backends, conjuring up new ones is common enough that we desire better documentation for doing it, the goal of simplifying these backends is moderately worthy, and.. "there is only one" backend. Uh... what? Yours in ignorance and confusion, --paulr

Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> writes: > On 25 May 2014 21:29, Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss at gmail.com> wrote: >> Sure. I think the only reason our use of aliases worked previously was >> that the optimizer elided them long before they could make it into an >> object file. > > If that is the case, you should be able to just directly replace

...discussion from roughly two years ago - http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-February/038302.html - confirms this, also showing that this optimization can be beneficial. So the questions are: 1. Should it not be always enabled? Why would we want to disable it? 2. Could a better name be conjured for it? As it stands now, the flag sounds like a binary predicate - either relax all, or don't relax all. Maybe something like "mc-early-relaxation" would be more descriptive? Thanks in advance for any insights, Eli (*) For instance in the case of X86, the MCInst emitter shrinks J...

...to take this opportunity to thank you all, this mailing list is by far the best I have ever seen, I would like to specially thank Ian Blackwell for offering more support and help; I will keep you updated on this project, I am sure there will be a lot of question and problem that will raise and conjure from this project Once again thank you all for the help and effort -- Harry Sukumar ________________________________ From: Harry Sukumar Sent: Tuesday, 10 June 2008 3:04 PM To: 'centos at centos.org' Subject: School Server Setup Hello All!!! I was...

...m. I want to develop a > relevance measure between a query and a sentence. I believe there already > exist many relevance measuring codes but those relate a query to a > document( as far as I know). The term "document" is what the literature uses, but the mental image that might conjure up of a multi-page printout with a staple through the corner is misleading. The "documents" being matched could be single sentences. > To develop a relevance measure I need to take > into consideration a large number of sentences and questions so that a > generic feature set c...

...the targets that LLVM supports, and these frontends already have the exact register positioning (if not naming) encoded in them. In addition, frontends must currently reason about exactly how each target in LLVM will choose to lower various arguments and return values of various types, and try to conjure up an LLVM type and parameter distribution which each target will lower into the exact registers which are mandated by the ABI for that target. So the situation today is that frontends have all of this target-specific information *and* there is an implicit, unspecified contract between the fronte...

On 19 October 2012 17:00, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > That said, I also don't like the idea of filling the IR with tons of target > specific stuff. In this case, I think it's even worse than "aapcs" or "fastcall", that are target dependent, but at a higher level. Proposing at which register each variable will be, forces the front-ends to

Mehdi, Hal’s transformation only kicks in in the *presence* of UB, and it does not matter how that UB got there, whether by function inlining or without function inlining. The problem with Hal’s argument is that the compiler does not have a built in ouija board with which it can conjure up the spirit of the author of the source code and find out if the UB was intentional with the expectation of it being deleted, or is simply a bug. Function inlining does not magically turn a bug into not-a-bug, nor does post-inlining simplification magically turn a bug into not-a-bug. Let me say...

...lcome bonus - when several computers are > protected by one UPS and one upsd, but I'd expect (maybe biased) that > any sort of small office or larger deployment with more than a couple > of NUT clients and/or servers would go for a centralized cert setup. > It is not too hard to conjure up, with many free and commercial tools > available to orchestrate depending on the scale they would need. > > As for listening on several interfaces and/or ports from a single upsd > instance, can't quickly check, so would fathom a guess that NUT > codebase did not have a re...