search for: concur

...no problem. Packet dump shows access error (DOSERR 5). I didn't observed any similar behaviour for Access 97. I have read on this list some good advice - get to the postgreSQL. Yes, I am working on it, but in meantime I would like to get this working. Did anyone observed similar problems with concurent access from 95 and NT? I do not use any special oplock options or whatever. this is part of my smb.conf: [database] comment = RSS Database path = /home/samba/database public = no writable = yes browseable = yes printable = no force user = gandalf write list = gandalf,...

...he) as the asterisk server - dell 400sc(Intel P4) as a SER server - digium isdn card, TE120P at Asterisk server - Bandwidth: 2Mbps/512kbps All SIP Phones are registered to SER server, and SER will route all outgoing calls to Asterisk server. My problem is the sound quality goes down if more than 3 concurent calls to PSTN. Logically i think our system and bandwidth are more than enough to handle 3 concurent calls, but as the 4th person use it, the sound become jerky and a bit delay. So how can we improve the sound quality? Thanks Regards, jorain -------------- next part -------------- An HTML...

I have let's say a reception that is comprised of 2 zap extensions and a mobile phone to dial using ISDN through Capi. I want to have a delay before starting dialing the mobile phone so that it rings only when the call has been unanswered for say 25 seconds. I tried to use Capi/2106994444:ww6935555555 but without any success. There is any way to do it or the code has to be modified ? Thanks

Hi, I notice `lli -print-machineinstrs -x86-asm-syntax=(att|intel)' both prefix registers with `%'. Is this right? I thought AT&T did this and Intel didn't. The GNU gas manual concurs. http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/manual/gas-2.9.1/html_chapter/as_16.html Cheers, Ralph.

When for example some call is wrong error message always looks like this: Assertion failed: ((i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Params[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"), function init, file /tmp/llvm-svn/llvm/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp, line 247. I believe assert() statements should better be replaced with more

Hello, I made upgrade from 3.0.2-2 to 3.0.4-1. I can''t start more than one domUs concurently. for example: I had 3 domUs called www1, www2, www3. I can start www1 and it works fine. Next I start www2 and server go immediately for reboot. I can start www2 and it works fine. Next I start www3 and server go for reboot. ... What''s happened in 3.0.4-1 ? Thank''s Dusa...

I concur. I've run into this exact assert at least 10 different times in the last two weeks since I started with LLVM as I'm learning the particulars of the typing system for function calls in particular. It would be nice if it would tell you what expected signature was, what the value of i was so...

...s is a compatibility package to accommodate ceph-devel split into > librados2-devel, librbd1-devel and libcephfs1-devel. Packages still > depending > on ceph-devel should be fixed to depend on librados2-devel, librbd1-devel, > libcephfs1-devel or libradosstriper1-devel instead. > I concur that the spec file uses that the way it is written. What I wonder is *IF* one wants to use ceph specifically, then are libvirt packages built against librados2-devel and librbd1-devel going to work then as well? I do concur that it seems in the beta for rhel-7.2 this all gets resolved for 7.2. S...

Hi: How to install and set up my asterisk server with G723 codec to send and receive calls using it. Thanks in advance; Wassim _________________________________________________________________ Explore the seven wonders of the world http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:59:25AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> wrote: > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h > > @@ -1,9 +1,17 @@ > > #ifndef _X86_KERNEL_PROCESS_IO_H > > #define _X86_KERNEL_PROCESS_IO_H > > > > +static inline void

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:59:25AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> wrote: > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h > > @@ -1,9 +1,17 @@ > > #ifndef _X86_KERNEL_PROCESS_IO_H > > #define _X86_KERNEL_PROCESS_IO_H > > > > +static inline void

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:01:40AM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > While trying to hunt down a codegen bug (not yet found) ... Have you considered using bugpoint for your codegen debugging needs? http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/Bugpoint.html#codegendebug > I've collected some small patches you might find useful. Sweet! > Please review and apply as you see fit. I've

This is a patch to X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT() which was hashed over on the Developers list with Intel concurring. It checks whether the -Oz (optimize for size) flag is set or whether the containing function's PGO cold attribute is set. If either are true it emits BT for tests of bits 8-31 instead of TEST. Previously, TEST was always used for bits 0-31 and BT was always used for bits 32-63. Since the...

Hi Reid Spencer, > CC=/path/to/llvmgcc CXX=/path/to/llvmg++ configure > make > > and was able to reproduce the problem. Not sure what's up with that but > as Misha pointed out, llvmgcc isn't any "particular" version of 3.4, its > just 3.4ish. I also concur with him that you should file a bug and > attach the pre-processed source to it. You can get that with the -E flag > to GCC. Many thanks for everyone's wonderful replies. I added the -E flag to the build options. Are the preprocessed sources the .o files that now look something like thi...

...ossings) that are rather poor (I think Quentin raised bugs on a couple of these) - but the old system could be a lot worse. I think Simon talks about PR21943, but this should not hold for moving forward. > I think the few cases that remain can easily be dealt with by individual bug reports. I concur. Just a quick question, did anyone check the differences on i386? I want to be sure we identified all the problems before we remove the ability to easily track down regressions. Thanks, Q. > > The amount of domain crossing is much lower now - but there are a number of float shuffles that...

On Thursday, 16 December 2010, > This cries out for different levels of verbosity. How about printing the encoding information for -verbose-asm=2 (or higher)? I concur, the current verbose level is enough for all my needs, now. If/when I start fiddling with MC, I might find that useful, but a special flag would do just fine. Cheers, Renato -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/ Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectiv...

...etd, undo it. heck, uniinstall xinetd, nothing in RHEL7/CentOS7 uses xinetd anymore. root# systemctl enable telnet.socket root# systemctl start telnet.socket the first command enables it so its available when the system is rebooted. the 2nd command starts it now. now, I will have to concur, the telnet protocol should be banned, and anything using it should be updated to use ssh instead. I haven't enabled telnetd on any unix/linux host for the last 10+ years. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=officejet+8620+manual I concur - I don't believe there is a password on the EWS. You should be able to print out the network settings from the LCD control panel, which will be 2 or 3 pages and includes info you need like MAC address[es], default and user-set passwords, IP address[es], et cetera.

On 7/30/2015 8:13 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > No snipping with bottom posting is worse than any top posting, IMHO. > It wastes space and time and is equally bad in digests. But you're > not likely to get the worst offenders to change. totally concur but as long as people are going to use cell phones as mobile computer substitutes, and considering how painful text editing on a touchscreen is, I doubt we'll get people to change. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

There is software out there which will rebuild. It is advanced level, so I would concur with the others to take it to a professional data recovery service. Most importantly at this moment is to remove the hard drive, or at least shut down the server to minimize the read/write to the disk. The more writes done the less likely recovery will be possible. Also, know whether you just wa...