Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "conexsi".
Did you mean:
conexi
2001 Jun 25
2
[OT] Re: Format comparison
merijnv@sci.kun.nl pondered the following....
Subject: [OT] Re: [vorbis] Format comparison
>Eh, just a (seemingly offtopic) question, but how do you create a 4
channel
>lp ? With just one needle ?
>-- Merijn
In a nutshell.
Normal LP has two halves in the groove - the L and R channel.
A Quad channel LP still has to 'halves' in the groove. Each channel is
actually BOTH the
2001 Apr 05
3
OT: long - Replacing CD's? was RE: New type of copy-prot ected audio CDs are coming...
It won't be long until big labels attempt to eliminate the digital
ins and outs of equipment. The problem they face is most people
that currently use a rack system featuring digital interconnects will
NEVER revert to an analog only system. I know that I won't!
Think back to VHS, BetaMax, SVHS and LaserDisc.
VHS has incredible market share because its licensing is open.
Betamax was
2003 Jan 24
3
OT: don't send html email - RE: Musicmatch
uggggh,
Friends don't let friends send HTML email.
A friendly request that you be considerate to those that do not want email
in virii susceptible formats.
Myles.
<p>Lorenzo banged on his keyboard and his computer puked the following....
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="MSHTML
2002 Mar 14
0
OT (pipes) - Was RE EAC: Ogg-on-the-fly?
>>Assuming someprog writes raw 16-bit signed stereo PCM to its
>>standard output, the following encodes the output of someprog to
>>foo.ogg, without using any temporary file :
>>
>> someprog | oggenc -r -o foo.ogg -
>>
>>For example, to encode track 1 of the audio CD in the drive :
>>
>> cdparanoia -r 1 - | oggenc -r -o track1.ogg -
>>
2002 Jun 21
0
OT - RE: When will quality increase be unnoticable?
In all the abx'ing and ear testing I've done in the past for my classical
and jazz music I have never seen or heard bladeenc output worse than xing.
(worse than lame, yes)
Now, to sorta keep this ON topic. I have never heard a an xing, blade OR
lame encoded mp3 sound better than a Garf tuned RC2 encode of my Jazz and
Classical stuff, (not a large sample set).
Also, I haven't used
2002 Jul 19
2
OT slashdoted BEFORE release?!?!
Dammit, Why can't slashdot at least confirm that A) its released and B) its
MIRRORED
BEFORE setting loose the /.'ers
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/07/19/1320219&mode=thread&tid=141
Myles
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
2002 Aug 27
0
OT - the "Dear Thompson Media" open letter.
I must admit, reading this: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/openletter.html
brought out the loudest laugh in quite some time.
My kids, hearing the hub-bub, gathered around the PC to see what I was
laughing at. I *attempted* to explain the new mp3 licensing terms to
my youngest daughter.
I finally hit pay-dirt when I explained to my kids the bait-and-switch,
what Thompson Media is doing now,
2003 May 05
0
with binaural-(or dummy head-or Kunstkopf-) recordin g, does vorbis keep the 3D sound?
Not exactly sure if this is what you are looking for, but here goes:
RC3 and prior maintain channel seperation with Q>=5.0 (cut-off is exact)
Vorbis 1.0 maintains channel seperation with Q>=6.0 (not sure of the exact
cut-off)
with release code, selecting a Q of 5.99 or lower will make assumptions for
channel seperation to save bits.
earch the archives for "ambisonics" - you may
2002 Jul 16
1
OT - RE: Coffee Break...
Your mention of the good ole' days of fidomail w/o spam got me digging for
my Wildcat install disks. I found them both. Now I realize I got rid of my
5.25 inch drive in 1991.
Hrmph.
- btw I love the lyrics. :)
<p><p>-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Cole [mailto:robert@support4linux.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 14:16
To: vorbis@xiph.org
Subject: [vorbis] Coffee
2002 Mar 26
2
OT: Perfect Pitch
I won't bother quoting all of Moz's statements of how sound
is interpreted by those blessed/cursed with tape recorders
in their heads :)
I will add that his whole explanation of perfect pitch
perception easily offers an explanation as to why
some individuals will only archive flac/pac/ape (Moz - do you?)
and those of us that do not perceive that level of
detail and are fine using ogg
2003 Jun 10
1
Calling for 5.1 Mastering experience! (vorbis am bisonics and 5.1)
On 20030610: Gregory Maxwell wrote:
(in reply to Ralph Giles)
>> I assume you're aware of the technical documentation on dolby's site?
>> (http://www.dolby.com/pro/) In particular the surround mixing guide has
>> a lot of detailed guidelines. I don't have any practical experience
>> with it though, so I can't vouch for it.
>Yes I am. I've done a