search for: conduct

...> 1) It would have been nice for this not to appeared out of thin air. In an ideal world, a previous update would have mentioned ongoing thought and research in this area. > Some back story here. I have gotten many requests through email and at the developer meetings about having a Code of Conduct and specifically having one for LLVM Developer Meetings. It has been discussed at many of the LLVM socials as well. I can see in hindsight this might appear to be coming out of nowhere for some, but it really is coming from a need we (the board) heard from the community. Thanks, Tanya > 2)...

LLVM Community, The LLVM Code of Conduct has been in draft mode for several years now. In order to finalize the Code of Conduct, there are 3 steps left to complete: Draft an Incident Response Guide. This guide is intended for someone who is considering reporting a potential code of conduct violation. You can view and comment on the prop...

Greetings everyone, On behalf of the board of the LLVM Foundation, I’d like to start the process of introducing a formal code of conduct for the community. For a long time, various members of the community have been enforcing basic reasonable and respectful behavior, but to an outsider this may not be obvious. A public code of conduct advertises the behavior we expect of community members and clarifies our stance. Having this is so...

...y > my intent is clear enough.) > I'm really not sure what you mean here. > > > | I guess one could write "In addition, violations of this code outside > these spaces may, in rare > > cases, affect a person's ability to participate within them, when the > conduct amounts to an egregious violation of the communitie's social > standard." > > > > If that's what it means, is there a problem with writing it that way? > What do you believe that explains that the older version did not? No matter how you write it, it will not precise...

Chandler, It's been 5 months since the last update I've seen on the proposed Code of Conduct. What is the current status of this? I'd really like to see the Code of Conduct committed. Last I recall, we still had some serious concerns and ongoing discussion about the Reporting Policy - I think you had a new draft to send out? - but the CoC had gotten pretty wide agreement. Can we...

Proposed alternative DRAFT -------------------------- LLVM Code of Conduct (LCoC) Prologue: LLVM community as a whole strives for equality and respect in all areas. With this in mind, we want to establish a few words that help(s)? everyone understand what to do if there is ever questions or conflicts. Motto: Be respectful, have fun and do great engineering. LLVM Commun...

...the proposed CoC is shorter than the > typical bulletin board CoC, so it's not bad; however, it think it could > be made more compact. Compactness is a definite virtue. I remember attending a very successful series of science-fiction conventions years ago, where the only formally stated conduct policy was "You kill it, you eat it." More extensive elaboration was deemed to be too prone to over-interpretation by people trying to get away with stuff, without actually providing useful guidance. As a year-round 95% online community, rather than a weekend convention with dozens of p...

Dear Colleagues/Developers/R enthusiasts, Would it be possible to develop a code of conduct (CoC) document for R lists, CRAN submissions that all developers/maintainers to follow? This may help all of us to better communicate and move forward together. There is a similar effort from Python community, here are the links: * https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/2017-August/022044.htm...

...ree that some descriptions are too verbose, and trying to be > exhaustive, whereas any list will be incomplete, we might just as well > be short and meaningful. And very relatedly: > > - *Be careful in the words that you choose.* We are a community of > > professionals, and we conduct ourselves professionally. Be kind to > others. > > Do not insult or put down other participants. Harassment and other > > exclusionary behavior aren't acceptable. > > This sums up well. The rest is just outlining behaviours that occur > with extremely low frequencies on...

...deteriorated. We are not there and it doesn't look like we are going in that direction. The FreeBSD CoC also looks reasonable, and if any CoC is needed, I find this one more appealing. -Krzysztof On 10/13/2015 11:16 AM, Kuperstein, Michael M via llvm-dev wrote: > The "No Code of Conduct" ( https://github.com/domgetter/NCoC ) version of this is "This project adheres to No Code of Conduct. We are all adults. We accept everyone's contributions. Nothing else matters." > > I'm not advocating something like this, but I tend to agree with the sentiment that D...

...any who aren’t responding > because they agree we need one and just want this thing done and > don’t want to talk about it anymore. Well, I can imagine that those who want to push in that direction don't want the opposition. > I don’t think we will agree about the need for a code of conduct. I > just don’t see it happening. Its not a US versus everywhere else > thing. All of the issues the code of conduct touches on are universal > across everywhere. Harassment is indeed universal. The ideas about how to best deal that with are not. > I feel strongly that we need a code...

...few concerns. =] I'm including an updated draft based on the feedback, and I'll also try to break down the major points I've seen of discussion. Sorry for the long email, but I suspect it is much shorter than trying to read through the entire thread. High level points about a code of conduct in general: - Is this trying to change how the community behaves? I think the resounding answer is no, this is very much meant to formalize the existing extremely polite and respectful behavior that the LLVM community has had for many years. - Was this proposed in response to some particular even...

...t dberlin.org] > *Sent:* Friday, July 01, 2016 7:46 AM > *To:* Robinson, Paul > *Cc:* Rafael Espíndola; LLDB; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; llvm-dev; > openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org) > *Subject:* Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an > LLVM Code of Conduct > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> > wrote: > > | It's not sanely possible to enumerate all the possibilities > > Not looking for that. Looking to avoid being trolled. ("Trolled" isn...

On 5/5/2016 4:19 PM, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > Having a code of conduct like this is just as bad as having no code of conduct at all. It trivializes the importance of a code of conduct and its pretty much impossible to enforce. Code of conduct should reflect the community standards, not define them. These standards come from the minds of the members of the community....

...te to the CoC stuff in the next few weeks. It hasn't been forgotten though. =] On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:20 PM Philip Reames via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Chandler, > > It's been 5 months since the last update I've seen on the proposed Code > of Conduct. What is the current status of this? > > I'd really like to see the Code of Conduct committed. Last I recall, we > still had some serious concerns and ongoing discussion about the > Reporting Policy - I think you had a new draft to send out? - but the > CoC had gotten pretty wi...

...ead.table(....) > attach(tc) > names(tc) tc = [1] "Well" "Depth" "Latitude" "Longitude" [5] "Formation" "Lithology" "LithClass" "CondUncert" [9] "sample.ID" "Conductivity" "Density" "Porosity" > plot(Depth[LithClass=='sand'], Conductivity[LithClass=='sand']) (ad nauseum... how can I loop through them all?) and ... > boxplot(Conductivity[LithClass=='clay']) > boxplot(Conductivity~LithClass)...

On 5 May 2016 at 23:06, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > The point is that you wouldn’t know that from looking at the alternative code of conduct. I would need to spend months pouring through mailing lists posts and watching the community to feel its a good and safe place. Right, this is a very good point for having something written down. > One of the many reasons a code of conduct is useful is to show outsiders what our community is...

...] > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:20 PM Philip Reames via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Chandler, > > It's been 5 months since the last update I've seen on the proposed > Code > of Conduct. What is the current status of this? > > I'd really like to see the Code of Conduct committed. Last I > recall, we > still had some serious concerns and ongoing discussion about the > Reporting Policy - I think you had a new draft to send out? - but the >...

On 5 May 2016 at 22:19, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Having a code of conduct like this is just as bad as having no code of conduct at all. It trivializes the importance of a code of conduct and its pretty much impossible to enforce. The same way you feel about this code, we feel about the alternative. It's only a matter of perspective. > After observing what is ha...

...munity have also expressed support for > this on this and previous threads. But our support is given as individual > members of the community and it should be valued as such. Just to add a little bit to this, it's very much a mischaracterization of the situation to imply that the code of conduct idea is some sort of demand coming from the foundation. People have been discussing the value that a code of conduct will bring to the LLVM community for as long as I've been a part of it. I'm personally very happy to see that this is finally making some progress, by the way. Thank you Cha...