search for: concluss

...we can come to some consensus. > > I think I have presented my case. > I'm fine if with the /de/ setup as well :) But some work might have to be done with some pages at the /German, as accessing the same page with /de/ does not work currently (i.e. RN for C6.0). But - once we have a conclussion - I gladly do the necessary work to those pages. cheers Christoph -- Christoph Galuschka CentOS-QA-Team member | IRC: tigalch

...eously in global terms (not intercept and slope separately) if there are differences among category 1 vs category 4 but adjusting for a continuous variable? Or it is not possible to do so, and I have to contrast both (difference of intercepts and difference of slopes separately) and obtain a global conclussion? Thanks a lot in advance, Berta [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Christoph Galuschka <tigalch at tigalch.org> wrote: > I've taken it up to do the RN-translations into German. Yes, those are done > :) Currently I don't have more pages in mind, but that could change. At the > time I started translating the RN, they where located at .../German. So I > continued with that setup. > > Maybe someone with

Hi, > I have samba 1.9.17p4 running on Solaris 2.5 > I do not have a NT machine on the net > What I need to do is beable to login to the NT Domain from W95 > machines. > What I get is "No Domain Server was able to validate your > password...". > If I just login and reconnect drives/printers I get a login to login > to the server and I mount drives/printers

What about idea not to *add* pae versions of xen kernels, but to *replace* non-pae versions with pae versions? Rationale: - not increase in archive size or linux-2.6 package build time, - this will improve compatimility with other distros (consider scenario when running FC or RHEL in domU; these distros do ship only pae xen kernels, according to

I am running 3.0.10-1.4E on RHEL4. The machine is a ADS member server. I would like to statically map the ADS group "Domain Admins" to the built in "wheel" group so all members of "Domain Admins" are in the "wheel" group. I have looked at the username map option, but I don't want a group of users mapped to a UID (this would defeat what I am trying to