search for: concluding

Hi all, I have read many forums and discussion groups talking about fax support in asterisk. Some of them conclude that asterisk doesn't support fax. However, some of them conclude that there is no relationship between fax and asterisk as asterisk will only pass the fax signal to the fax machine. I have tried the fax in asterisk before but failed. Anyone can give me some guideline how to

hey all, i need to create a good & attractive Rails-2.1.1 Demo presentation(with the full working flow) what are the main features should be concluded in presentation ? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this

Rsync's "does this file need to be updated" check can conclude "this file does not need updating" even though the "last changed" timestamp differs. This happens when the size and modify timestamp are equal. Why doesn't rsync consider the "last changed" timestamp in the same respect as the modify timestamp? Doesn't changed mean, er, changed?

Good Day. Recently buy an lenovo laptop (110 Ideapad 14IBR). Install (with problems) Centos 7, but when start the first time, get the fail screen. Then, I try to start the x server (startx) get the error: FBIOBLANK invalid argument. This laptop have an Intel HD graphics 400 and a Intel Celeron N3060; googling , I concluded that is a fail in the driver, but don?t know how resolve. Please help

Good Morning, I would like to know if is possible to do a conference with 9 client with asterisk. The client is connecting to sever through lan, we think don't use PSTN or ISDN. Thanks, Alberto -- Alberto Carlana <alberto.carlana@virgilio.it> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes

On 6/4/2013 7:31 PM, David Mirabito wrote: > Hi Carl, > > I don't know much about the specifics of any given optimisation, but if you do something like the following, you can at least see which optimisation pass is responsible. > At the very least perhaps that can point to the next place to investigate. (also interesting to note Apple's shipped clang doesn't exhibit this

Hi all R users, I'm trying to replicate the same results that are given in a published article after been granted the same data that the authors use. I'm having problems to determine the cointegration rank of my data set using the Johnasen's trace test. This trace test is already programmed in the package ur.ca and can be found in the function ca.jo(). After I run the ca.jo()

Hi all, Is there a way to study the lead and lag relation of two time series? Let's say I have two time series, At and Bt. Is there a systematic way of concluding whether it's A leading B or B leading A and by how much? Thanks!

I''m setting up a new server in anticipation of switching from lighttpd+fcgi. My application isn''t completely imported yet, so I don''t expect it to work. For instance right now when pulling up my app from localhost I get my Ruby/Rails MySQL error message. But when I pull it up from a remote computer I get a proxy error from Apache: ====================== Proxy Error

I installed asterisk 1.4.4 final ,but the cdr is not written any patch or tweaking can be done Regards ********************************************* No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this

I''ve installed facter-1.6.0 and puppet-2.7.3 on a number of SLES 10 hardware nodes (HP DL580) running the Virtuozzo hosting software. Well, facter correctly identifies such a machine as a hardware node ("virtual => openvzhn") but somehow concludes that the hardware node is in fact virtual. ("is_virtual => true") This breaks some rather important logic. If

Hi Michael On Tue Nov 10, 2020 at 1:29 AM GMT, Michael Kruse wrote: > Am Mo., 2. Nov. 2020 um 14:01 Uhr schrieb David Blaikie > <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > Hmm, not sure why the whole file was added only when MSVC support was added - if it is a "static library object file selection" issue. Wouldn't that have turned up on other platforms before that moment? >

I received this response from a member of the OpenLDAP core team when asking about meaning of the deferred operations I was seeing. Is it possible that this is what I'm seeing, Timo? -Ben --------------------------------------------- I'd note that if your client is performing search + bind on the same connection in an asynchronous manner, then the server behavior as per RFC4511 is

when I enter asterisk-addons-1.4.1 and make menuselect ************************************* Asterisk-addons Module Selection ************************************* Press 'h' for help. XXX 1. app_addon_sql_mysql

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM Bob Haarman <llvm at inglorion.net> wrote: > I would like to better understand how you came to conclude that the > tablegen re-runs based on changes in Support are what's causing your build > to be slow and what part specifically is taking all that time. I can do a > clean release + assertions build of LLVM, Clang, compiler-rt and lld in >

Ok folks, I wrote up the general high-level thoughts I have about stateful AA in a separate thread. But we need to sort out the completely and horribly broken aspects of GlobalsModRef today, and the practical steps forward. This email is totally about the practical stuff. Now, as to why I emailed this group of people and with this subject, the only pass pipeline that includes GlobalsModRef, is

Hello, I just had a meeting about a pilot project going on in our University, The project manager has done some research in the past year and concluded that Asterisk can not scale well to large user base like 10,000 users, thus Asterisk is not fit for large University environment. The project manager instead choosed sipX and said it scales well for large user base. I had an Asterisk running

On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:12:19 -0800 Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote: > As a maintainer myself (and based on somewhat disturbed feedback from > other maintainers) I can only make the conclusion that nobody knows what > the responsibility part here means. > > I would interpret, if I read it like at lawyer at least, that even for > existing code you

> I try to build a cross powerpc compiler, but llvm-gcc fails on > crtstuff.c / crtbegin.o In the archives I found a thread where more or less the same problem is discussed: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-January/037327.html Can I conclude from this that indeed llvm-gcc for powerpc-linux is broken? Is anyone maintaining llvm-gcc for powerpc-linux or is it abandoned?

> The optimizer can therefore conclude that if this program has > well-defined behavior, then x can never point to the null pointer > constant (since the null pointer constant is not part of any array > object). As a result, the "if (!x)" branch would never trigger, and is > dead code. This is correct: in C you can't create a null pointer by decrementing a valid