search for: conclude

Hi all, I have read many forums and discussion groups talking about fax support in asterisk. Some of them conclude that asterisk doesn't support fax. However, some of them conclude that there is no relationship between fax and asterisk as asterisk will only pass the fax signal to the fax machine. I have tried the fax in asterisk before but failed. Anyone can give me some guideline how to make fax support...

hey all, i need to create a good & attractive Rails-2.1.1 Demo presentation(with the full working flow) what are the main features should be concluded in presentation ? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3...

Rsync's "does this file need to be updated" check can conclude "this file does not need updating" even though the "last changed" timestamp differs. This happens when the size and modify timestamp are equal. Why doesn't rsync consider the "last changed" timestamp in the same respect as the modify timestamp? Doesn't chan...

...buy an lenovo laptop (110 Ideapad 14IBR). Install (with problems) Centos 7, but when start the first time, get the fail screen. Then, I try to start the x server (startx) get the error: FBIOBLANK invalid argument. This laptop have an Intel HD graphics 400 and a Intel Celeron N3060; googling , I concluded that is a fail in the driver, but don?t know how resolve. Please help me. Sorry For my English. Best regards.

Good Morning, I would like to know if is possible to do a conference with 9 client with asterisk. The client is connecting to sever through lan, we think don't use PSTN or ISDN. Thanks, Alberto -- Alberto Carlana <alberto.carlana@virgilio.it> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes

...al spec explanation: Start with x--. Per C11: If both the pointer operand and the result point to elements of the same array object, or one past the last element of the array object, the evaluation shall not produce an overflow; otherwise, the behavior is undefined. The optimizer can therefore conclude that if this program has well-defined behavior, then x can never point to the null pointer constant (since the null pointer constant is not part of any array object). As a result, the "if (!x)" branch would never trigger, and is dead code. So this doesn't look like an invalid opt...

...t;=7 74.12 49.65 53.12 60.16 r<=6 113.96 71.86 76.07 84.45 r<=5 158.58 97.18 102.14 111.01 r<=4 207.95 126.58 131.7 143.09 r<=3 278.29 159.48 165.58 177.2 r<=2 361.34 196.37 202.92 215.74 r<=1 481.09 236.54 244.15 257.68 r=0 626.23 282.45 291.4 307.64 >From this output I would conclude that the cointegration rank is either 9 or 10. If I run the same test in Stata I get completly different numbers, especially for my test values. These values actually correspond to the values the authors get in the article. From that output I would conclude that the conintegration rank is either 6...

Hi all, Is there a way to study the lead and lag relation of two time series? Let's say I have two time series, At and Bt. Is there a systematic way of concluding whether it's A leading B or B leading A and by how much? Thanks!

...ny review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of it from your system. The sender accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of the sender by means of email communications unless expressly stated to the contrary. ==================DISCLAIMER================================

I installed asterisk 1.4.4 final ,but the cdr is not written any patch or tweaking can be done Regards ********************************************* No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its subsidiaries and associates. This electronic...

I''ve installed facter-1.6.0 and puppet-2.7.3 on a number of SLES 10 hardware nodes (HP DL580) running the Virtuozzo hosting software. Well, facter correctly identifies such a machine as a hardware node ("virtual => openvzhn") but somehow concludes that the hardware node is in fact virtual. ("is_virtual => true") This breaks some rather important logic. If anyone knows of a patch floating around out there for 1.6.0 I''d be obliged. Even better would be to get this officially fixed for facter-1.6.1. Joe -- You receive...

...> > It did turn up on non-Windows platforms in > https://reviews.llvm.org/D61446. The name of the file where this trick > is used "LinkAllPasses.h" should give a hint what it is used for. > Looking into the entire history of the file, I have no idea how one > would have concluded this whas a Windows thing. It first occurred in > 1c5b428ff8234cef705bf57bc1418deb4db25c83 (SVN r23921) when Windows > support was not yet a thing. I concluded this was a windows thing because the origin of the code seems to be in 00d5508496c1ec0540da5714b0ed66e64b623df5 which uses the wind...

...----------------------------- I'd note that if your client is performing search + bind on the same connection in an asynchronous manner, then the server behavior as per RFC4511 is undefined, since a server is not supposed to be willing to handle operations intermixed with binds until a bind is concluded. That is, any operation can be multiplexed on a single LDAP connection __except__ binds, which must be serialized. A more appropriate client for that type of operations would need to use at least 2 connections, one for searches and one for binds, and the one for binds should take care of either...

...[*] 5. format_mp3 XXX 6. res_config_mysql Cannot install app_addon_sql_mysql .. Any dependencies required ? Regards ********************************************* No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its subsidiaries and associates. This electronic...

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM Bob Haarman <llvm at inglorion.net> wrote: > I would like to better understand how you came to conclude that the > tablegen re-runs based on changes in Support are what's causing your build > to be slow and what part specifically is taking all that time. I can do a > clean release + assertions build of LLVM, Clang, compiler-rt and lld in > about 5 minutes, plus 40 seconds to run cmake...

...er used by an instruction other than some very small set (gep, bitcast) as "non-address-taken". It then runs GetUnderlyingObject on the two pointers in alias queries, and if that finds one of these "non-address-taken" globals for one of the memory locations but not the other, it concludes no-alias! This is broken for a number of reasons. a) If the two locations merely have a different *depth* of instruction stack, because GetUnderlyingObject has a recursion cap, one side can fail while the other succeeds, and we erroneously produce no-alias. b) If instcombine or any other pass fo...

Hello, I just had a meeting about a pilot project going on in our University, The project manager has done some research in the past year and concluded that Asterisk can not scale well to large user base like 10,000 users, thus Asterisk is not fit for large University environment. The project manager instead choosed sipX and said it scales well for large user base. I had an Asterisk running in my office for small user base, I don't have e...

...iners) I can only make the conclusion that nobody knows what > the responsibility part here means. > > I would interpret, if I read it like at lawyer at least, that even for > existing code you would need to do the changes postmorterm. > > Is this wrong interpretation? Should I conclude that I made a mistake > by reading the CoC and trying to understand what it *actually* says? > After this discussion, I can say that I understand it less than before. Have you read Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst? As has been pointed out, it contains a clear answer t...

> I try to build a cross powerpc compiler, but llvm-gcc fails on > crtstuff.c / crtbegin.o In the archives I found a thread where more or less the same problem is discussed: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-January/037327.html Can I conclude from this that indeed llvm-gcc for powerpc-linux is broken? Is anyone maintaining llvm-gcc for powerpc-linux or is it abandoned? Maarten Faddegon

> The optimizer can therefore conclude that if this program has > well-defined behavior, then x can never point to the null pointer > constant (since the null pointer constant is not part of any array > object). As a result, the "if (!x)" branch would never trigger, and is > dead code. This is correct: in C yo...