Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "compulsorary".
Did you mean:
compulsary
2004 Aug 06
2
legalities of streaming
...hey fall under the auspices of "Interactive" ? Well
they have not to my knowledge to this point? And precedent has been set at
least since 1999 that the Recording/licensing entities have indeed excepted
it and licensed broadcasters with "request" functions/features under a
"Compulsorary" license ...
Sadly for now however these rules will be changing due to the current deals
made by both the larger Commercial and Terra Broadcasters as well as
.EDU/Non-Comm.'s and for the remaining broadcasters, other than the current
set CARP rate/terms or the SWA(Small Webcasters Act) -...
2004 Aug 06
0
legalities of streaming
...uspices of "Interactive" ? Well
> they have not to my knowledge to this point? And precedent has been set at
> least since 1999 that the Recording/licensing entities have indeed excepted
> it and licensed broadcasters with "request" functions/features under a
> "Compulsorary" license ...
>
> Sadly for now however these rules will be changing due to the current deals
> made by both the larger Commercial and Terra Broadcasters as well as
> .EDU/Non-Comm.'s and for the remaining broadcasters, other than the current
> set CARP rate/terms or the SWA(...
2004 Aug 06
3
legalities of streaming
Oh, I almost forgot...
If you're going under compulsory licensing:
1) Listener requests cannot be honored, otherwise you will end up labeled an
"interactive service" along with Audiogalaxy Rhapsody & the like. Which means
more & more expensive royalties.
2) You cannot play more than 3 songs of the same album in any 3 hour period
(no more than 2 in a row). Nor can you