search for: compile_r

...;true" : "false", + osinfo->product_name ? osinfo->product_name : "(none)", + (int) osinfo->type, (int) osinfo->distro, + osinfo->major_version, osinfo->minor_version); +#endif + } + } + + return 0; +} + +static int compile_re (guestfs_h *g, xmlNodePtr child, pcre **re); + +/* Read the regular expressions under the <iso> node. libosinfo + * itself uses the glib function 'g_regex_match_simple'. That appears + * to implement PCRE, however I have not checked in detail. + */ +static int +read_iso_node (guest...

...;true" : "false", + osinfo->product_name ? osinfo->product_name : "(none)", + (int) osinfo->type, (int) osinfo->distro, + osinfo->major_version, osinfo->minor_version); +#endif + } + } + + return 0; +} + +static int compile_re (guestfs_h *g, xmlNodePtr child, pcre **re); + +/* Read the regular expressions under the <iso> node. libosinfo + * itself uses the glib function 'g_regex_match_simple'. That appears + * to implement PCRE, however I have not checked in detail. + */ +static int +read_iso_node (guest...

...;true" : "false", + osinfo->product_name ? osinfo->product_name : "(none)", + (int) osinfo->type, (int) osinfo->distro, + osinfo->major_version, osinfo->minor_version); +#endif + } + } + + return 0; +} + +static int compile_re (guestfs_h *g, xmlNodePtr child, pcre **re); + +/* Read the regular expressions under the <iso> node. libosinfo + * itself uses the glib function 'g_regex_match_simple'. That appears + * to implement PCRE, however I have not checked in detail. + */ +static int +read_iso_node (guest...

...;true" : "false", + osinfo->product_name ? osinfo->product_name : "(none)", + (int) osinfo->type, (int) osinfo->distro, + osinfo->major_version, osinfo->minor_version); +#endif + } + } + + return 0; +} + +static int compile_re (guestfs_h *g, xmlNodePtr child, pcre **re); + +/* Read the regular expressions under the <iso> node. libosinfo + * itself uses the glib function 'g_regex_match_simple'. That appears + * to implement PCRE, however I have not checked in detail. + */ +static int +read_iso_node (guest...

...;true" : "false", + osinfo->product_name ? osinfo->product_name : "(none)", + (int) osinfo->type, (int) osinfo->distro, + osinfo->major_version, osinfo->minor_version); +#endif + } + } + + return 0; +} + +static int compile_re (guestfs_h *g, xmlNodePtr child, pcre **re); + +/* Read the regular expressions under the <iso> node. libosinfo + * itself uses the glib function 'g_regex_match_simple'. That appears + * to implement PCRE, however I have not checked in detail. + */ +static int +read_iso_node (guest...

...emote.example.com - * sshpass 123456 ssh -l root remote.example.com + * sshpass [-d] 123456 ssh remote.example.com + * sshpass [-d] 123456 ssh -l root remote.example.com + * + * Use the -d flag to enable debugging to stderr. */ #include <config.h> @@ -42,9 +44,18 @@ static pcre *compile_re (const char *rex); +static void +usage (void) +{ + fprintf (stderr, "usage: sshpass PASSWORD ssh [SSH-ARGS...] HOST\n"); + exit (EXIT_FAILURE); +} + int main (int argc, char *argv[]) { + int opt; + int debug = 0; mexp_h *h; const char *password; int status; @@ -52,20 +6...

Hi all, Here is an update of the series fixing Pino's latest comment. It just doesn't implement the change based on never-accepted run commands patch. Cédric Bosdonnat (9): lib/osinfo.c: Extract xml processing into a callback lib: extract osinfo DB traversing API mllib: ocaml wrapper for lib/osinfo builder: rename docs test script builder: add a template parameter to get_index

Hi all, Here is a new version of the virt-builder-repository series taking care of Pino's comments. It has also been rebased on recent master. Cédric Bosdonnat (7): mllib: factorize code to add Checksum.get_checksum function Move xml and xpath_helpers OCAML code to mllib mllib: expose libosinfo DB reading functions in mllib builder: rename docs test script builder: add

Hi all, Here is an updated version of that patch series. Diff to v5: * Apply Pino's comments * Fix indentation issues * Add a default value for arch in builder/index_parser.ml if template is set * Improved new images filtering: don't process image that didn't change. This has been uncovered by introduction of --no-compression Cédric Bosdonnat (10): lib/osinfo.c:

Hi all, Here is the v5 of my patches series applying the latest comments from Pino. Cédric Bosdonnat (10): lib/osinfo.c: Extract xml processing into a callback lib: extract osinfo DB traversing API mllib: ocaml wrapper for lib/osinfo builder: rename docs test script builder: add a template parameter to get_index builder: add Index.write_entry function dib: move do_cp to

Hi guys, Here is a v3 of the series, including changes to answer Richard's comments. Cédric Bosdonnat (10): mllib: factorize code to add Checksum.get_checksum function Move xml and xpath_helpers OCAML code to mllib mllib: add Xml.parse_file helper lib/osinfo.c: Extract xml processing into a callback lib: extract osinfo DB traversing API mllib: ocaml wrapper for lib/osinfo

Hi all, Here is a v4 of my series. It includes the changes according to Pino and Richard's comments. However, the perrorf/debug problem is addressed differently: instead of adding an implementation for the internal function names when building for mllib, I redefine these macros. Obviously this is not perfect, but at least easier to understand. Pino's comment about the Notes regex

Currently you can only turn on miniexpect debugging by recompiling. These two patches make it configurable at runtime, and also improve the usefulness of the output. Rich.

...;true" : "false", - osinfo->product_name ? osinfo->product_name : "(none)", - (int) osinfo->type, (int) osinfo->distro, - osinfo->major_version, osinfo->minor_version); -#endif - } - } - - return 0; -} - -static int compile_re (guestfs_h *g, xmlNodePtr child, pcre **re); - -/* Read the regular expressions under the <iso> node. libosinfo - * itself uses the glib function 'g_regex_match_simple'. That appears - * to implement PCRE, however I have not checked in detail. - */ -static int -read_iso_node (guest...

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid