Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10523 matches for "commercialized".
2013 Feb 21
1
Commercial or not?
Hi All,
Let's say someone uses an R package (prefer to not disclose which) that comes with two different distributions,the commercial and non-commercial license. Now the non commercial license has conditions,bit it never runs out. So if this person knows they should be using the commercial license, because they are not a student and are paid for their work , (ie they are outside the
2001 Jun 06
2
ssh-keygen key conversion questions
Using ssh-keygen from OpenSSH-2.9p1, I can perform the following key
conversions:
- convert a commercial public key into an OpenSSH public key:
% ssh-keygen -i -f commercial-key.pub > openssh-key.pub
- convert a commercial private key into an OpenSSH private key,
provided that the commercial key has no password
% ssh-keygen -i -f commercial-key > openssh-key
-
2005 Jan 11
28
SS7 and Asterisk solution
Hello,
We are looking for commercial solution SS7 with Asterisk.
It does not need to be "build-in" with Asterisk.
Could anybody suggest something?
Thank you in advance.
Bart
2006 Feb 15
3
[LLVMdev] commerical usage
Hello!
I have been looking at the LLVM project for quite a bit but I was
wondering if there are any implication of using the project in a
commercial enviroment in terms of licensing restrictions and other
related issues, are there other people that use LLVM in a commecial
enviroment?
Regards
Jonas Gustavsson
2007 May 30
2
newb trying to figure out ActiveRecord relationships
3 tables. item, brand, commercial
item
--------
id
name
brand_id
name
brand
---------
id
name
commercial
----------
id
item_id
The idea is that a commercial will have one item.
each item will have brand.
and a brand may have zero to many items.
I can''t figure out how to make the relationships for my models.
Eventually, i''d like to be able to show a brand name from a
2006 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] commerical usage
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:53:05AM +0100, Jonas Gustavsson wrote:
> I have been looking at the LLVM project for quite a bit but I was
> wondering if there are any implication of using the project in a
> commercial enviroment in terms of licensing restrictions and other
> related issues, are there other people that use LLVM in a commecial
> enviroment?
LLVM's license is a
2006 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] commerical usage
In addition, there are groups at STMicroelectronics and at Siemens
that have used or are considering using LLVM. Note that these are
internal development projects for now -- they (and Apple) have not
publicly announced products based on LLVM.
--Vikram
http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
On Feb 14, 2006, at 11:24 PM, Misha Brukman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at
2005 Oct 21
2
Commercial license?
Hi there
Is there a commercial license for using Rsync or the Rsync algorithm
within a commercial product? I appreciate that Rsync as it stands is GNU
and therefore it cannot be used in this way, but I thought that I would
ask the list. I understand that it is open source, but we have an
application that would benefit from something like Rsync and therefore
thought we would ask the question. If
2011 Jan 24
1
commercial software license with XEN "xm" command?
Hi Sir, Mam,
I plan to develop a commercial (proprietary) software that would have a system call to XEN "xm" command. Since XEN and Samba license are GPL, I'' like to make sure if I can release my commercial software with a commercial license instead of GPL? and what particular things I should do when I release the commercial software.
Thanks,
Wei Cao | ZZH2 2W081 | 8 821 5739
2008 Jun 17
3
Commercial Support for CentOS 5 or above
Hi,
I saw there's one "Commercial Support" in "Support" menu on CentOS main
page, but it's blank. Actually I'm looking for the commercial support
for CentOS, is there anyone or organization which is doing this?
Thank you very much.
--
Best regards,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2008 May 28
1
MKL Patch
On 5/28/08, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> wrote:
> > Yes, MKL is commercial software and you do need to pay for it, but
> > unlike FFTW it's not GPL. FFTW is useless for any closed-source program
> > that wishes to use Speex, so this is the non-GPL alternative.
>
> Considering that FFTW also sells licenses for non-GPL use, I tend to
>
2008 May 27
5
MKL Patch
Alexander Chemeris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/27/08, Thorvald Natvig <thorvald at natvig.com> wrote:
>
>> And here's a patch for Intel Math Kernel Library. This allows commercial
>> users of Speex to use a high-speed FFT library that isn't GPL'd. (You do
>> need to pay for it though). This is 3 times faster than the default FFT in
>> speex, and
2005 Sep 27
10
Software only Asterisk PBX (commercial)
Are there any switchvox/fonality type Asterisk based PBXs where I can
buy just the software? I don't want to buy their 'bundles' that come
with junky PC hardware. I just want their software/GUI to run on my
hardware.
Does Asterisk BE come with a GUI management console for managing
phones, queues, VM and the like?
-Matt
--
Matthew S. Crocker
Vice President
Crocker
2006 Nov 27
5
What do you think about commercial applications for Rails?
Hello all,
I''m a RoR fan. I''ve read some RoR books, and I''m starting to use RoR for
commercial proyects.
As I use RoR more and more, I think about inexistent tools that would be
great to have when developing applications in RoR. For example: an IDE
with more features than RadRails. So then I think "hey! you could
produce one of these tools".
Some of these
2006 Jan 22
3
Installing the none commercial intel g729codecs into Asterisk@Home 2.2?
Hang on.... there's a non commercial G729 codec that will work with Asterisk? Can someone point me to where I can find it?
Thanks,
Doug.
-----Original Message-----
From: Francesco Peeters (Asterisk) [mailto:francesco@fampeeters.com]
Sent: Sun 1/22/2006 8:27 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
2006 Jan 27
1
Installing the none commercial intel g729 codecsinto Asterisk@Home 2.2?
Thanks but this is for a test, I didn't buy the first one as it's a non commercial installation. I'm trying to test bandwidth etc so I need to try out how 4 of them handle the link simultaneously, I just don't know how to add a second test license.
Dean
________________________________
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
2008 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL
Roman Levenstein wrote:
> - possibility of using 3rd party libs like Boost (or their parts) in LLVM
>
There is a thread elsewhere on this mailing list illustrating how
important it is for the maintainers of LLVM to keep LLVM usable in a
commercial environment. As such, I would strongly recommend avoiding
Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters, regardless of its license,
for
2008 May 18
3
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote:
> There is a thread elsewhere on this mailing list illustrating how
> important it is for the maintainers of LLVM to keep LLVM usable in a
> commercial environment. As such, I would strongly recommend avoiding
> Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters, regardless of its license,
> for including
2004 Sep 26
6
Looking for a commercial version of an IAX2 Softphone
Hello All,
I have been looking for a commercial version of an IAX2 Softphone for
Windows but the ones I have came across (i.e. Iaxcomm, Iaxphone, Diax) do
not seem to have an updated version since April 2004 in some cases.
We looked at Firefly but we sent emails to Virbiage/Freshtel with questions
and could never get a response from them.
Has anyone got any recommendations for commercial
2005 Jul 01
19
Epia C3 Linux
Anyone know a good distro for an Epia Mobo with the C3 chip?
I have been trying to get Debian and Gentoo installed (new to me) and so
far having little luck.
Does anyone know a good install for this processor/mobo combo?
Thanks
Wiley
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: