search for: comfirmation

Hellow, members I want to use SAMBA with disk quota support on AIX machine, but have not succeeded yet. Are there any members who could succeeded setting up SAMBA on that environment? OS:AIX4.3.3 SAMBA:2.2.5 configure option:--with-quotas First, I configured AIX's quota environment, and confirmed quota worked fine. And I accessed to SAMBA, but disk size displayed on Windows explorer did

So bath samba 4.7.6 and 4.8.0 hava this problem. Can it be comfirmed to be a bug? If so, it seems to be an important issue that should be resolved as an important function of a DC. Up to now I only have samba 4.5.x that work normal. But 4.5.x won't have new version any more. While I want to keep my samba to be the newest security version. Hope this problem get resolved soon. Thanks for your

Hi, Just to comfirm that I have just clean built the current LLVM and VMKIT revisions and it failed too. The problem seems to be the same one (about escape analysis in LLVM). My configuration is Ubuntu 10.04 and GCC 4.4.3 on x86. Cheers, Chanwit Konrad Hinsen-2 wrote: > > On 6 Jul 2010, at 22:25, Zoe Wolk wrote: > >> If anyone is able to build vmkit and get it to run without

Can someone comfirm my logic here? If I want a phone to use G729.... I can set it to use G729... do I also need to set it in Asterisk? I'm thinking no... as long as asterisk WILL do G729... if that's all the device accepts it should go to that codec, yes?

On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:28:38 +1200 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 22:37 +0300, Taner Tas wrote: > > > Nobody has looked into it yet. Likely just an extra build rule > > > required, I would need to see the 9.11 and 9.12 DLZ header files to > > > check. > > > > > > Aaron Haslett (CC'ed) may be able

Hello Nicolas, Thank you for quick reply. Is LLVM revision 107641 a good one to build with latest VMKIT? Thanks, Chanwit On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 00:06, nicolas geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > Yes, there was a change in the LLVM CallInst API, and I haven't updated > vmkit yet. It should be fixed real soon. > Cheers, > Nicolas > > On Wed,

I am thinking about building a new host and trying to decide if virt-manager is working on CentOS 8. I thought I saw previously on the mail list that there were some issues but cannot find the thread right now. If anyone has migrated some workloads from 7 and seen any issues let me know. Thanks :)

Hi, all. My name is Kenichiro Ochi, in Oracle Japan Support. Customer examines upgrading OCFS from 1.0.9-12 to 1.0.14-1. And customer asked us a question about the way of downgrading to 1.0.9-12. (customer presumes a case in case after the upgrade.) We tested the following... 0.After the upgrade 1.umount OCFS volume on all nodes 2.uninstall rpm (V1.0.14-1) # rpm -e ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 # rpm

Hi, I am a beginner of bridge. I have a problem of using Fedora Core 2 to make a simple bridge. Here is my setup: The bridge computer is installed with Fedore Core 2 (with the SE Linux patch). As I know that kernel 2.6.5 is already support bridging by default, so I didn't recompile the kernel. Then I installed bridge-utils-0.9.6-1.i386. And no additional configuration is made. After

Hi, this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there something I miss ? thanks very much for any help luigi

Latest version of vmkit should now build fine with latest llvm. Nicolas On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:02 AM, nicolas geoffray < nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: > The one that I have currently that works with vmkit is 107120. > > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <chanwit at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hello Nicolas, >> >> Thank you for

Hi all, Yes, there was a change in the LLVM CallInst API, and I haven't updated vmkit yet. It should be fixed real soon. Cheers, Nicolas On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:50 AM, chanwit <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Just to comfirm that I have just clean built the current LLVM and VMKIT > revisions and it failed too. > The problem seems to be the same one (about

Hi all: I have a quesion about ANOVA: Is SS(Sum of Square) of a specific factor constant with the number of factors changing? dat1 includes one factor g1,and g1's SS is called SS_g1_dat1. dat2 includes two factors g1,g2,and g1's SS is called SS_g1_dat2. My quesion is: Is SS_g1_dat1 equals to SS_g1_dat2? I have both "yes" and "no" reasons for the quesion,but

The one that I have currently that works with vmkit is 107120. On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Nicolas, > > Thank you for quick reply. > Is LLVM revision 107641 a good one to build with latest VMKIT? > > Thanks, > > Chanwit > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 00:06, nicolas geoffray > <nicolas.geoffray at

hi... i want to use maildir format so like i see un some manuals i create this directory for my virtual users: # ls -la /export/home/vmail/prueba.uy/t* /export/home/vmail/prueba.uy/toto1: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 vmail vmail 512 Apr 10 15:09 . drwxr-xr-x 6 vmail vmail 512 Apr 9 12:11 .. /export/home/vmail/prueba.uy/toto3: total 10 drwxr-xr-x 5 vmail vmail 512 Mar

Thank you, Nicolas. But I still have no luck compiling the latest revision. However, vmkit-0.27 is compiled and running fine on my machine. Thanks, Chanwit On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 05:18, nicolas geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: > Latest version of vmkit should now build fine with latest llvm. > Nicolas > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:02 AM, nicolas geoffray >

I''m using rails3. It does not seem to check the authenticity_token when doing a POST using Ajax. I traced this to: module ActionDispatch class Request < Rack::Request ..... def forgery_whitelisted? get? || xhr? || content_mime_type.nil? || ! content_mime_type.verify_request? end end so you don''t check if its a get? or a xhr? (ie ajax request). Is this correct? --

> Nobody has looked into it yet. Likely just an extra build rule > required, I would need to see the 9.11 and 9.12 DLZ header files to > check. > > Aaron Haslett (CC'ed) may be able to help once he fights past the other > BIND9 issues he is looking at. > > Andrew Bartlett Thanks for response. I actually looked it myself. Since there is no DLZ ABI changes since

Hi Chanwit, What problems did you have for compiling the latest revision? Could you give me a log? Thanks, Nicolas On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you, Nicolas. > But I still have no luck compiling the latest revision. However, > vmkit-0.27 is compiled and running fine on my machine. > > Thanks, > > Chanwit >

Guys, I've heard about some absurd RAM requirements for 9.1, has anybody tested it? e.g. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36314 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.